Temat: i pamięć - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Zabytkowy most na Wiśle w Tczewie, czyli pamięć i niepamięć
The historical bridge over the Vistula River in Tczew, or memory and oblivion
Autorzy:: Affelt, Waldemar J.
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20874576.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2022
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: zabytkowy Most Tczewski
ochrona dziedzictwa techniki
pamięć społeczna i kulturowa
historical Tczew Bridge
protection of technical heritage
social and cultural memory
Opis:: W artykule omówiono dzieje mostu drogowego w Tczewie, którego najstarsza żelazna część powstała w latach 1852-1858 jako budowla sześcioprzęsłowa – stanowiąca układ trzech belek zespolonych – wówczas nowatorska na kontynencie europejskim. Szczególną uwagę poświęcono wysadzeniu mostu przez polskich saperów 1 września 1939 roku oraz czasom jego odbudowy po 1945 roku. W skład mostu weszło pięć różnych typów przęseł, w tym dwa nawodne, złożone według polskiego projektu konstrukcyjnego z brytyjskich elementów wojskowego mostu składanego zwanego ESTB, produkcji Dorman Long Middlesbrough. Rozwikłanie tego skrótu prowadzi do pełnej nazwy Everall Sectional Truss Railway Bridge, czyli Segmentowy Kratowy Most Kolejowy, który zaprojektował angielski konstruktor, wówczas podpułkownik, William Teague Everall (1880-1968), Elementy te trafiły do Polski w ramach działalności United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA). Stan techniczny mostu w XXI wieku zaczął budzić obawy i po doraźnych remontach postanowiono zamknąć go całkowicie dla ruchu pieszego i kołowego. Starostwo Powiatowe w Tczewie, zarządca mostu, rozpoczęło starania o przywrócenie użyteczności tego obiektu, wynikiem czego, w 2019 roku, stało się przystąpienie do rozbiórki przęseł ESTB metodą cięcia palnikiem gazowym, bez względu na fakt wpisania całej budowli do rejestru zabytków. Autor interpretuje to przedsięwzięcie w kontekście ochrony zabytków oraz nauk o pamięci, gdyż podjęcie odbudowy mostu dla przywrócenia mu wizerunku z czasów Królestwa Prus stanowi zatarcie śladów tragedii z początków II wojny światowej.
The article discusses the history of the road bridge in Tczew, whose the last iron part was made in 1852-1858 as a six-span construction – forming a layout of three welded beams – innovative on the European continent at that time. Special attention has been devoted to the blowing up of the bridge by Polish sappers on 1 September 1939 and the time of its rebuilding after 1945. The bridge comprised five different types of spans, including two surface spans, assembled according to a Polish constructional design from British elements of a military folding bridge called ESTB, made by Dorman Long Middlesbrough. Unravelling of this abbreviation leads to the full name of the Everall Sectional Truss Railway Bridge, which was designed by the English constructor, then lieutenant colonel, William Teague Everall (1880-1968), These elements were brought to Poland within the activity of the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA). The technical state of the bridge in the 21st century raised concern, and the bridge was closed completely for the pedestrian and vehicular traffic after interim renovations. The Starostwo Office (district authority) in Tczew, the administrator of the bridge, undertook efforts to restore usability of this object. As a result, in 2019, the ESTB spans were demolished by a method of gas ring cutting, regardless of adding of the whole structure to the register of historical monuments. The author interprets this operation in the context of the protection of historical monuments and sciences concerning memory, as rebuilding of the bridge for restoring its image from the times of the Kingdom of Prussia blurs the traces of the tragedy from the beginnings of World War II.
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2022, 1; 45-74
0029-8247
2956-6606
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Szanowni Państwo, wierni Czytelnicy, Autorzy i Recenzenci „Ochrony Zabytków”!
Ladies and Gentlemen, faithful Readers, Authors and Reviewers of “Ochrona Zabytków”!
Autorzy:: Serafinowicz, Jacek
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535722.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: Ochrona Zabytków
setna rocznica wybuchu I Wojny Światowej
pamięć Wielkiej Wojny
Opis:: This year’s second, and at the same time last issue of “Ochrona Zabytków” is to some extent extraordinary, due to an important anniversary. When, in early spring this year, I published an appeal directed to environments close to the heritage protection in all of its aspects, and containing a request to particularly mark in “Ochrona Zabytków” the hundredth anniversary of an outbreak of the World War I, I did not expect – truth be told – such a wide response. It turned out, meanwhile, that the memory of the Great War is still an inspiration for numerous specific studies, explorations of topics so far forgotten or insufficiently examined in due course, and also, obviously, reminders of anniversary nature. Fruit of the above-mentioned appeal turned out to be so abundant that it was impossible to print all of the sent and reviewed articles in this volume without prejudice to a sacred principle of diversity of topics. Thus, the charm of Wyniosła wieża [Majestic tower] and dramatic tension of Sierpniowe salwy [August bursts of fire] will accompany us in “Ochrona Zabytków” also in 2015. Although answered Bard’s prayers for Wojna Ludów became a macabre and barbaric bloodbath and for humankind it was not a memento for long, to Poles – inter alia – it finally brought freedom, and a legionnaire act became a legend. Could that be different? Mentioning well-known Vilnius artists, in June 1939, in the second issue of the “Wilno” quarterly, Helena Römer, daughter of the brilliant painter, caricaturist and collector, recalled the person of Franciszek Jurjewicz – an emigrant from the tsarist times known as Parisian. Jurjewicz entered the Legions in 1914 being... 73 years old! Let us then repeat: could that be different? Coming back to the table of contents, I must admit that from among important and interesting articles printed in this issue I am delighted with an article entitled Heritance Tea Factory – a hotel in an authentic tea factory – revitalisation in harmony with the monument. Of course, I do not recommend reading the volume from the end, because after all it is an oddity, but living “in an authentic tea factory” is a very well invented treatment – it gives joy, introduces the atmosphere of a fairy-tale, moves to the reality and climates of Sri Lanka, showing culture and skills of the architect worthy of utmost respect. This article in its entirety smells like the world’s best Ceylon tea and happily takes us to realities completely different from the war ones. It leads us straight to Christmas. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Jacek Serafinowicz Editor-in-Chief
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 2; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe w świetle ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego
Intangible cultural heritage in the light of protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions
Autorzy:: Ratajski, Sławomir
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538459.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:: UNESCO
niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego z 2003 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego z 2005 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego z 1972 roku
Program UNESCO Pamięć Świata
społeczność lokalna
tożsamość
dziedzictwo materialne
zrównoważony rozwój
kultura
dialog pokoju
dialog kultur
różnorodność wyrazu kulturowego
lista reprezentatywna niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego ludzkości
lista światowego dziedzictwa
polityka kulturalna
polityka rozwojowa
kultura narodowa
kultura lokalna
dobra kultury
przemysły kultury
Milenijne Cele Rozwoju ONZ
prawa człowieka
Opis:: The article refers to two UNESCO conventions adopted by Poland in recent years: The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of 2003 and the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions of 2005. On one hand, comparing the content of these documents allows better understanding of the keynote of the concept of safeguarding intangible national heritage applied by UNESCO, and, on the other hand, this guiding principle shows the long distance covered while shaping the vision of cultural heritage over forty years from the establishment of the Convention on Safeguarding the Cultural and Natural Heritage in 1972. To complete the picture, UNESCO’s “Memory of the World” Programme of 1992, concerning safeguarding the documentary heritage, including the digital heritage, must be mentioned. These documents capture the diverse landscape of human cultural heritage, being complementary to each other. They are permeated by the principles of the protection and promotion of the heritage to varying degrees: equality, diversity, equivalency, share in the sustainable development, importance of an individual creator, and also an important role of the local community in this process. They indicate the evolution of the development conditions based on the cultural awareness, sense of identity, formed in the process of gradual identification of one’s own tangible and intangible heritage. They emphasize the possibility of a significant participation of culture in development. The Preamble to the Convention from 2005 contains provisions which formulate principles in a clear way, and also shed light on understanding other UNESCO conventions and programmes, especially on the particularly important Convention from 2003. The principle of non-evaluation, which applies to making new entries on the Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, so difficult to understand in the light of the experience related to the application of the criteria for making new entries on the World Heritage List, in accordance with the Convention on Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage from 1972, gains importance in the perspective of “cultural diversity forming a common heritage of humanity” and being “a mainspring for sustainable development for communities, peoples and nations”. The Convention emphasizes the importance of culture for social cohesion; developmental role of exchanges and interactions between cultures based on freedom of thought, expression and information, as well as diversity of media; the importance of linguistic diversity; the importance of vitality of cultures, including for persons who belong to minorities and indigenous people, as “manifested in their freedom to create, disseminate and distribute their traditional, cultural expressions and to have access thereto, so as to benefit them for their own development”. These statements give special meaning to the main thoughts of the Convention of 2003, which indicates the fundamental importance of the local community and individual carriers in ensuring vitality of the intangible heritage as a basic condition for its protection. Hence the differences in determination of goods added to the lists established on the basis of the Convention of 1972 and of 2003. In the first case, the dominating principle is the principle of selection of the most outstanding works in a given field, based on the methodology determined by specialists using the criteria of European historical and aesthetic tradition. In the case of the Convention of 2003, there was a clear evolution towards the recognition of the values of cultural phenomena rooted in the local context, proving, first of all, the diversity and authenticity of these phenomena, with their significance in creating the culture for the local community and as a manifestation of their identity, and, with the use of tools for the protection of these phenomena/ elements, may participate in the dialogue of cultures on the national and global scale. The process of the implementation of the Convention gives a huge chance to prepare a methodology consistent with the assumptions of the Convention of 2003, by means of activities that aim at creating the national register of the intangible heritage, and thus recognize, disseminate and maintain the richness of intangible culture in Poland which, as a result of a well conducted cultural policy consistent with the principles of the Convention of 2005, should be present in the developmental processes of our country in a creative manner.
Źródło:: Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 5-18
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:: Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "i pamięć" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język