Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Konwencja" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 20
Tytuł:
POZAMATERIALNE I NIEOBECNE DZIEDZICTWO KULTURY
THE NON-MATERIAL AND ABSENT CULTURAL HERITAGE
Autorzy:
Barański, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538413.pdf
Data publikacji:
2005
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
niematerialne
folklor
dziedzictwo kultury
dziedzictwo pozamaterialne
konwencja UNESCO
Opis:
Heretofore conservation of cultural legacy monuments was concentrated predominantly on the protection of their material stratum. Non-material, extramaterial, and absent legacy was not guaranteed proper attention despite the fact that its co-existence was noticed. Consequently, many monuments and sites became deformed and even deprived of this type of heritage. Upon the threshold of the twenty first century, the ability to define and protect the cultural qualities of the non-material legacy, conceived as tradition, custom, cultural space, as well as extra-material legacy, in which sensitivity to colour, scent, sound, and texture of material is a factor that characterises both the object itself and historical space; it is decisive for the new quality of the protection of cultural legacy. In a wider range, analyses and protection are due to absent heritage, i.e. the sort which had been liquidated as a result of wars or for other reasons. The process of rendering this type of legacy indelible in social consciousness compels us to seek suitable forms of its expression and presentation. A complex approach in the protection of the material and extra-material aspects of cultural legacy will generate a new quality which, presumably, will speak to the contemporary recipient more comprehensively.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2005, 3; 49-56
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
4. Europejskie Forum Dziedzictwa Wrocław, 10-12 października 2011 rok
4th European Heritage Forum Wrocław, 10-12 October 2011
Autorzy:
Therond, Daniel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537555.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Europejskie Forum Dziedzictwa
Europejskie Dni Dziedzictwa
Wrocław
Konwencja Faro
Opis:
European Heritage Days are mainly local initiatives that give inhabitants an opportunity to learn about the history of their nations and regions inhabited by them and arouse their sensitivity to treasures of nature and culture. In 2011 the thematic scope of programmes offered in almost 50 countries played a significant role in the improvement of the level of awareness among citizens. The year 2011 was marked by the introduction of the Framework Convention of the Council of Europe on the value of cultural heritage for society, called alternatively the Faro Convention, on 1 July 2011; it is the first treaty containing a detailed definition of the conception of “common European heritage”. The subject of the Wrocław forum in 2011 is: “Value the Heritage. European Heritage and Economic Development”. In modern society, guaranteeing the future of the heritage requires not only work on the part of professions and specialised administration, but also collective projects and joint responsibility that would engage the public sector, legal entities, voluntary workers and the entire civil society. The economic nature of the Wrocław forum should not be surprising if we take into account the current crisis that causes anxiety in many countries. The discussion regarding the subject of the 4th European Heritage Forum will be continued in works of the Steering Committee for Culture, Heritage and Landscape (CDCPP) of the Council of Europe. EHDs reveal the importance of joint activities of the Council of Europe and the European Union for the purpose of experiencing the common European heritage in a more direct way and making life better for all of us.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 165-167
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
PRAWNA OCHRONA ZABYTKÓW NA WYPADEK WOJNY
THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN CASE OF WAR
Autorzy:
Zajadło, Jerzy
Zeidler, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535518.pdf
Data publikacji:
2003
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
prawna ochrona zabytków
działania wojenne
konwencja o ochronie dóbr kulturalnych
dziedzictwo kultury
kultura
dobra kultury
Konwencja Haska
Międzynarodowy Rejestr Dóbr Kulturalnych Objętych Ochroną Specjalną
ochrona specjalna
Opis:
The protection of cultural property at the time of an armed conflict comprises an extremely essential problem. International law foresees detailed guidelines concerning this issue in its Convention on the protection of cultural property in the case of an armed conflict, the Executive rules to this convention and the Protocol on the protection of cultural property in case of an armed conflict, signed at The Hague on 14 May 1954. These documents list the instruments and legal institutions protecting historical monuments during this particularly dangerous time. From the practical viewpoint, particular importance is attached primarily to a detailed definition of the object of protection. The instruments of protection include the specially noteworthy special protection, the International Register of Cultural Property under Special Protection, as well as the storage and transport of cultural property. Apart from the above mentioned detailed rules, which have not as yet been accepted by all countries, cultural property is protected according to assorted general principles. International law indubitably exerts direct impact on the contents of domestic law. Nonetheless, importance should be attached not only to law, but also to suitable social policies which ought to focus universal awareness on the necessity of preserving material cultural heritage for successive generations.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2003, 1-2; 116-121
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konwencja o ochronie podwodnego dziedzictwa kulturowego
Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage
Autorzy:
Kobyliński, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538437.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Konwencja o ochronie podwodnego dziedzictwa kulturowego
zagrożenia dla podwodnego dziedzictwa kulturowego
podwodne dziedzictwo kulturowe
Europejska Konwencja o Ochronie Dziedzictwa Archeologicznego
niszczenie podwodnego dziedzictwa kulturowego
Konwencja Narodów Zjednoczonych o prawie morza
UNCLOS
prawo ratownictwa morskiego
prawo własności podwodnego dziedzictwa kulturowego
Karta Ochrony i Zarządzania Podwodnym Dziedzictwem Kulturowym ICOMOS
Opis:
The 33rd session of the UNESCO General Conference, held on 2 November 2001, passed a Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, an act of international law prepared for more than twenty years. The article discusses the history of the legislation undertakings which ultimately produced the text of the convention and explains the reasons for the lengthy absence of a consensus. The author delves into foremost controversial issues such as criteria for the definition of underwater cultural heritage, the relation between the titular convention and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the attitude of the convention to the law of salvage, the possibility of granting jurisdiction dealing with the protection of underwater cultural heritage to littoral states within the range of their exclusive economic zones and the Continental shelf and, finally, the relations between the convention in question and the ICOMOS Charter on the Protection and Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage. The article also offers a concise presentation of the contents of the most significant fragments of the ultimately accepted convention.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 2; 142-151
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
KONFERENCJA „PERIODIC REPORTING FOLLOW-UP MEETING FOR EASTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPE” Wrocław, 14-15 września 2007 r.
THE ”PERIODIC REPORTING FOLLOW-UP MEETING FOR EASTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPE” CONFERENCE Wrocław, 14-15 September 2007
Autorzy:
Marconi-Betka, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539012.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
światowe dziedzictwo UNESCO
konwencja UNESCO
Raport Okresowy dla Europy
Lista Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO
Opis:
Ameeting of experts dealing with the UNESCO World Heritage, attended by 37 participants from 13 countries, was held in Wroclaw on 14-15 September 2007. The session was organised by the National Heritage Board of Poland in the name of the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and the Minister of Culture and National Heritage. The states-signatories of the UNESCO convention on the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage are obligated to present reports on the realisation of the convention’s resolutions. The first series of the European Regular Report was conducted in 2003-2006. The Wroclaw conference was the first meeting of the representatives of Central and East European countries, dedicated to continuing undertakings stemming from the Regular Report. Subsequently, it became a forum for an exchange of experiences and joint conclusions. In view of the fact that the Report encompasses the earliest entries on the UNESCO World Heritage List, the participants of the meeting asserted the necessity of supplements which, in the first stage, are to explain the limits of the included site and its protective sphere and then discuss the criteria according to which it had been originally placed on the List. Subsequent tasks entail defining the exceptional merits of a given site. The meeting also considered plans for a system of administering the world heritage sites. The participants stressed unanimously that a suitable pronouncement of the significance of a site and its exceptional value forms a basis for effective administration. The conference included a tour of the Centennial Hall in Wrocław, together with the adjoining exposition area – the most recent Polsh site to be included onto the UNESCO World Heritage List.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2007, 1; 13-15
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Państwo, drodzy Czytelnicy, Autorzy i Recenzenci „Ochrony Zabytków”!
Dear Sirs and Madams, dear Readers, Authors and Reviewers of the “Ochrona Zabytków”!
Autorzy:
Serafinowicz, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535221.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ochrona Zabytków
konwencja UNESCO
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
dziedzictwo niematerialne
Lista światowego dziedzictwa UNESCO
Opis:
We present to you another fascicle of jointly created periodical (in the current six-monthly form) – a collective work, which can be, without exaggeration, described as: joint effort. If I were to title it separately, the title would be: Between tangible and intangible heritage – the idea of comprehensive protection of the world’s cultural and natural heritage. It sounds elevated, maybe even pompous, however – as we know well – in the global perspective, there are diverse situations, a current example might be the devastated Aleppo, which is, after all, not the only site of crime against cultural heritage. The threads of intangible heritage, in this volume, both from the perspective of up-to-date UNESCO documents and conventions, and from the perspective of “archaeology of notions” and research on intangible heritage of the Polish rural areas, as well as the narratives of collective memory, constitute the first part of the volume. The second part, on the other hand, for a kind of a counterweight, is devoted only to tangible heritage, focusing on the issues of wooden architecture, and strictly speaking, on wooden sacral construction, on both sides of the Polish-Ukrainian border in which we see a tremendous potential for further common research and academic cooperation. The second part of the volume is concluded by an interesting article devoted to framework architecture of Uhlans’ barracks in Toruń. In the third, final part, we present articles of diverse subject matter, a considerable substantive significance, discussing, among others, Polish successes related to entries on the UNESCO’s World Heritage List to which the National Heritage Board of Poland contributed greatly, but also presenting hazards concerning possible further entries, which should not be forgotten, just like we should not forget about people of exceptional merits, whose profiles we recall. Let us return, however, to our reality and our questions about intangible heritage. What is it for an ordinary inhabitant of the country between the Odra River and the Bug River, how does our ordinary compatriot understand them and does he or she have keys to it, or has someone hidden it, to use a euphemism..? It seems there is a long march ahead of us. If today someone asked me about what I believe to be the most important throughout our entire spectrum of the intangible heritage, I would certainly reply: my homeland and my faith. And if I was asked what I would most gladly enter to the intangible heritage list, I would say: all Polish “żurawiejka” poems, even though they might be obscene, including my favourite, which I would not dare to quote. Not so long ago, on the occasion of a full, six-hundredth anniversary of concluding the Horodło Union, Kazimierz Wóycicki from the Eastern Europe Study Centre of the Warsaw University wrote: „We live in the 21st century, and we still think in categories of the 19th century. This happens because great narrations determining the sense of modern nations were created exactly in the 19th century, when the most important thing was defending identity against external impacts. Historiography of remembrance, dealing with social representations of the past, enables gaining a distance to those tales shaped in the 19th century, through a dialogue of narratives” and, at the same time, enables expansion of the methodological scope of research on phenomena related to intangible heritage. Dear Sirs and Madams, to conclude, I would like to give my regards to the entire editorial team, who for a few recent years, working with devotion, perfection and energy, have done truly a lot in the Kraków office – it can be said without a shade of exaggeration that they re-formatted and modernized the way of thinking about our periodical. I would like to thank wholeheartedly, not only on my own behalf, the editor Ms. Olga Dyba, the editorial secretary – Mr. Andrzej Siwek and the editor Mr. Tomasz Woźniak. Dear friends – you are real professionals, and a hard act to follow... Yours respectfully Jacek Serafinowicz Editor-in-Chief
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 3-5
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Międzynarodowa konwencja o ochronie dóbr kulturalnych weszła w życie
Autorzy:
Nahlik, St.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535298.pdf
Data publikacji:
1956
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
UNESCO
Konwencja o ochronie dóbr kulturalnych w razie konfliktu zbrojnego
ratyfikacja konwencji UNESCO 1956
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1956, 4; 261-263
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Działalność UNESCO w dziedzinie ochrony dóbr kultury
ACTIVITÉ DE L’UNESCO DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA PROTECTION DES BIENS CULTURELS
Autorzy:
Ptaśnik, Mieczysław
Sieroszewski, Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536507.pdf
Data publikacji:
1969
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Międzynarodowa konwencja o ochronie dóbr kultury w wypadku konfliktu zbrojnego
ochrona zabytków w czasie wojny
Konwencja Haga 1954
UNESCO
Protokół haski
Międzynarodowy Rejestr Dóbr Kultury objętych Ochroną Specjalną
roboty inwestycyjne zagrożeniem dla zabytków
„dobra kultury”
ratowanie zabytków w Nubii
Opis:
L ’UNESCO ex e rc e son a c tiv ité dans le domaine de la p ro te c tio n des b ien s c u ltu re ls sous fo rm e d ’une n o rm a lis a tio n des p ro b lème s ju rid iq u e s su r l ’a rè n e in te r n a tio n a le , de l ’o rg an isa tio n de la s au v e g a rd e im m é d ia te des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s menac és, d ’un e coo rd in a tio n des ré a lis a tio n s s c ie n tifiq u e s e t te ch n iq u e s de la co n s e rv a tio n e t de la re s ta u ra tio n . La „Conventio n in te rn a tio n a le su r la p ro te c tio n d e s b ie n s c u ltu re ls en cas d ’u n co n flit a rm é ” a d ap té e en 1954, c o n s titu e le d o cum en t fo n d am e n ta l ju r id iq u e d ans ce d omaine. Elle a p o u r b u t, en cas d ’u n co n flit armé, d e m e ttr e à l ’a b ri les m o n um e n ts de la c u ltu re de fa ço n q u ’ils ne p u is sen t s e rv ir d ’o b je c tifs d ’o p é ra tio n s de g u e rre . D’a u tr e s o rd o n n an c e s ju rid iq u e s p u b lié e s p a r l ’UlNESOO, non encore comp rises d ans la Conv e n tio n , so n t p u b lié e s sous fo rm e d e re com m an d a tio n s, e lle s c o n c e rn e n t l ’in te rd ic tio n de l ’e x p o rta tio n illic ite des o eu v re s d ’a r t de leu rs pays re sp e c tifs e t la po ssib ilité de le u r échange légal, a in si q u e la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s men a c é s p a r la cons tru c tio n de n o u v e a u x o b je c tifs in d u s trie ls ou p a r la ré u rb a n is a tio n . O u tre l ’a c tiv ité ju rid iq u e , l ’in té rê t q u e l ’UNESCO ■porte au x p ro b lèm e s de la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s se m a n ife s te dans l ’o rg an is a tio n d’une a id e p o u r les p ay s, d o n t les en sembles de m o n um en ts, p a r su ite de cata clysme, ont é té d é tru its . In s titu é sous le p a tro n ag e de l ’UNESCO à Rome, le C e n tre In te rn a tio n a l d ’E tu d e s p o u r la C o n se rv a tio n e t la R e s ta u ra tio n des Biens C u ltu re ls e s t ch a rg é de la d o c um en ta tio n des re ch e rch e s s u r les p ro b lèm e s sc ie n tifiq u e s e t te ch n iq u e s liés à la c o n se rv a tio n et la re c o n s tru c tio n . L e C e n tre v e ille à la co o rd in a tio n e t donne l ’essor a u x tr a v a u x de ce g en re , e t l ’ICOMQS, c réé en 1965, te n d au re n fo rc em e n t de la coopéra tio n e n tre les sp é c ia liste s de d iv e rs p ays. Bien que de n omb reu se s ré a lis a tio n s a ie n t é té accomp lie s dans le d omaine de la p ro te c tio n des m o n um en ts h is to riq u e s, il c o n v ie n d ra it, d ans u n e p lu s la rg e m e su re , de d év e lo p p e r la fo rm a tio n de sp é c ia liste s -c o n - s e rv a te u rs e t r e s ta u r a te u r s a in si qu e le u r co lla b o ra tio n in te rn a tio n a le en ce q u i concerne la p ra tiq u e d ire c te de la co n se rv a tio n .
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1969, 4; 249-256
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
32. SESJA KOMITETU ŚWIATOWEGO DZIEDZICTWA UNESCO Quebec, 2 - 10 lipca 2008 r.
32nd SESSION OF THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Quebec, 2- 10 July 2008
Autorzy:
Piotrowska-Nosek, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537613.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Komitet Światowego Dziedzictwa
Konwencja UNESCO
miejsca wpisane na Listę UNESCO
Lista Światowego Dziedzictwa w Zagrożeniu
realizacja Konwencji UNESCO
Opis:
The UNESCO World Heritage Committee, representing 185 signatories of the UNESCO Convention Concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage, took place on 2-10 July 2008 in Quebec City (Canada). The Committee session made several decisions concerning sites from the UNESCO World Heritage List located in Poland. One of the sites that the Committee has been discussing for several years is the Auschwitz-Birkenau Nazi concentration and death camp (1940-1945) and the state of its vicinity. This time was no such debate was held, but the government of the Republic of Poland was requested to provide information about the preparation and realisation of an administration plan relating to the site and its immediate surrounding. Other issues included the delineation of the boundaries of historical city centres in Warsaw and Cracow, the medieval town of Toruń, the Old Town in Zamość and the Castle of the Teutonic Order in Malbork. In the case of the Białowieska Forest the Committee obligated the Polish and Belarusian sides to organise a mission of experts for the purpose of explaining the boundaries and principles of the protection of this particular site. Information about World Heritage as well as the sessions and decisions of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee is available on: http://whc.unesco.org and the website of the National Heritage Board of Poland: http://www.kobidz.pl
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 1; 5-6
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pojęcie dziedzictwa kulturowego i jego znaczenie dla działań polskiej administracji publicznej wobec integracji europekskiej
The Concept of Cultural Heritage and Its Significance for Polish Public Administration in View of European Integration
Autorzy:
Dobosz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535342.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Pojęcie dziedzictwa kulturowego
dziedzictwo kulturowe
dziedzictwo kulturalne
dziedzictwo narodowe
ochrona dóbr kultury
aspekt prawny ochrony dóbr kultury / dziedzictwa kulturalnego
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego w Unii Europejskiej
„Wspólne dziedzictwo kulturowe"
system prawny Rady Europy
Europejska konwencja kulturalna
Europejska konwencja o ochronie dziedzictwa archeologicznego
Konwencja o ochronie dziedzictwa architektonicznego
traktat między Rzecząpospolitą Polską a Republiką Federalną Niemiec
traktat o dobrym sąsiedztwie i przyjaznej współpracy
prawodawstwo UNESCO
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego
Konferencja Generalna Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych dla Wychowania, Nauki i Kultury
Komitet Dziedzictwa Światowego
Opis:
In his reflections on international and European legal norms referring to the protection of cultural heritage in Poland the author presented select international bilateral conventions (involving the Republic of Poland and West Germany) as well as international European Council conventions which unfortunately do not encompass Poland; they include the Convention about the protection of architectural heritage (1985) which Poland did not ratify. European Community legislation is discussed against the background of the Treaty on the establishment of the European Community and the “Association Convention” embracing Poland and the European Community together with its member states. The proposed analysis pertains to UNESCO legislation whose norms are binding for Poland upon the basis of signed and ratified international conventions. The author outlined the backdrop of constitutional expressions pertaining to the protection of cultural heritage, and examined the relations between the concepts of “national” and “European (joint) cultural heritage” .
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 2; 121-141
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konwencja Haska z 1954 r. a konflikt na Bliskim Wschodzie
THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 1954 AND THE HOSTILITIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST
Autorzy:
Sieroszewski, Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538785.pdf
Data publikacji:
1973
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Konwencja Haska
ratyfikowanie Konwencji Haskiej
„wojna sześciodniowa”
ochrona zespołu Starego Miasta Jerozolimy
zwoje papirusowe znad Morza Martwego
ołtarz z Banyas
Opis:
The first practical application of the Hague Convention of 1954 during hostilities in the Middle East is analysed by the author who at the same time reminds that there were no possibilities for intervention by UNESCO for the sake of cultural property protection during the earlier armed conflicts as the Vietnam War or the Suez conflict of 1958. At the end of 1967 and in the beginnings of 1968 on initiative of Director General of UNESCO and in agreement with the parties interested the Commissioner Generals have been appointed to the Government of Israel and to Governments of the four Arab countries, i.e. Egypt, the Kingdom of Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. At the same time during six years of hostilities the Executive Council and the Conference General of UNESCO were several times dealing with claims submitted by Jordan and the other countries with respect to behaviour of authorities of Israel with regard to cultural property in territories under occupation. The above claims concerned the illegal demolitions, archaeological excavations, transfers of historic monuments and the like Both Executive Council and Conference General during these years took several resolution’s disapproving the measures taken by Israel and demanding the cease of such practice which unfortunately have proved unsuccessful. More successful proved to be activities of Commissioner Generals in their respective places of action. Due to their e ffective work and authority they gained as a result of their activities it was possible to settle or at least to clear a number of disputable cases and to incline the occupational authorities to resign of some measures intended for changing the character and townscape of Jerusalem. From among such cases should, above all, be mentioned here that of the so-called Dead Sea Scrolls which originally were transferred from the Rockefeller Museum to the Museum of Israel and later, after conservation, have been almost completely returned. In quite similar way was settled the case of an altar taken from Banyas, Syria that after some time has been sent back to its proper place. Much effort was devoted to clear the matter of a fire of a widely known Al-Aksa mosque which, as has been later stated, was burnt out not as a result of intended setting on fire but as a result of failure of electrical installation. The above mosque is now rebuilt by WAKF, a Moslem Religious Foundation acting in agreement with the Corporation of Jerusalem. Less successful proved the endeavours aimed at inclining the Israel archaeologists to resign of excavations in the area of Jerusalem’s Old Town and of demolition of some objects in the same area which might lead to disturbances in the traditional landscape of the Old Town Quarter. Summing up his considerations the author comes to a conclusion that the Hague Convention, though not entirely free of certain lacks and obscurities and unable to ensure the full protection to cultural property during the hostilities, can palliate some their results that as a final result may be of importance both for cultural heritage of countries involved in a war conflict and the whole mankind as well.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1973, 3; 170-175
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego
CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE
Autorzy:
Jaworski, Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538560.pdf
Data publikacji:
1977
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
UNESCO
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa 1972
dziedzictwo kulturalne
dziedzictwo naturalne
Komitet Dziedzictwa Światowego
Fundusz Dziedzictwa Światowego
dziedzictwo o światowym znaczeniu
Opis:
The Polish People’s Republic ratified, in 1976, the Convention Concerning the Protection o f the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO in Paris, November 16, 1972. The first step which initiated UNESCO activities in the that sphere — says the author — was the international campaign started a dozen or so years ago and aimed at saving the rock-cut temples in Abu Simbel in Nubia. That campaign, and and the following ones of similar nature, made the foundation for the setting up o f a system o f international cooperation and assistance striving for protection of the cultural heritage of outstanding and universal value. Proceeding with his deliberations the author quotes the assumptions of the Convention formulated in its preamble and points out to their significance from the viewpoint of interpretation o f the provisions o f that act. Now one of the most important tasks in the sphere of national protection o f the cultural and natural heritage is the state’s task o f including the programme for that protection into general planning. The author is aware o f the complexity of that task and the difficulties involved in its implementation because of the ditferent assumptions and values employed by the staff of monument protection service and by planners and making premises for the preparation of plans. Moreover, in some cases the planners’ failure to take into account all the elements o f environment results in the undesirable fact of certain goods o f the heritage discussed being an obstacle to implementation of plans. ' Another group o f the tasks examined by the author are those ensuing from ratification o f the Convention by Poland. The most essential there is, in his opinion, that o f drawing up an index of the goods of the nation’s cultural and natural heritage which should be proposed for being entered into the ’’list o f the world heritage”. As regards the heritage o f culture, such an index should be drawn up, together with relevant scientific documentation, by the Centre for Documentation o f Historical Monuments, Warsaw, in association with scientific institutions, major museums, and the branch offices of the Centre. In consonance with the stress laid by the Convention on the growing role of science, the author takes up the problem of the need for enchancement of the number o f high-skilled personnel to work in the respective lines of the service for the protection of the cultural and natural heritage, for improvement and development o f the scientific and research potential actively engaged in the protection o f the heritage discussed. Reference is also made of the contribution paid by Polish conservators and scientists, especially those versed in Mediterranean archeology, to the work on saving a number of monuments abroad. The following part of the paper comprises an attempt at an evaluation of the Convention. Its significance is seen by the author to lie in the grounding of a realistic system of cooperation o f the international community in protecting the goods of the said heritage which are recognized as those o f universal importance. What is meant by him as the reality o f that system is, on the one hand, the fact o f a subsidiary character having been imparted to international assistance and, on the other, that of prividong for the Convention being put into effect due to the indispensable material means of the World Heritage Fund. The author is highly appreciative o f the fact of the problems o f the cultural heritage, and those of the natural one, having been combined in the Convention. This solution is recognized as a correct one on account o f common elements appearing in the protection o f both o f them, to mention but similar tasks involved, and methods employed, in that protection and the legal institutions which serve it. In view o f the ever growing and negative role of the threats of various kinds, the author postulates preparation of a comprehensive inter-ministerial (horizontal) programme for cooperation which would take into consideration not only the problems of the protection o f the cultural and natural heritage, but also those of environmental protection in the full sense of the word. The author concludes his paper in determining the Convention as an act, internationalist in its essence which, like the whole of UNESCO activities, is far from a cosmopolitan approach to the cultural and natural heritage of the respective nations.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1977, 3-4; 108-112
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe w świetle ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego
Intangible cultural heritage in the light of protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions
Autorzy:
Ratajski, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538459.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
UNESCO
niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego z 2003 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony i promowania różnorodności form wyrazu kulturowego z 2005 roku
Konwencja w sprawie ochrony dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego z 1972 roku
Program UNESCO Pamięć Świata
społeczność lokalna
tożsamość
dziedzictwo materialne
zrównoważony rozwój
kultura
dialog pokoju
dialog kultur
różnorodność wyrazu kulturowego
lista reprezentatywna niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego ludzkości
lista światowego dziedzictwa
polityka kulturalna
polityka rozwojowa
kultura narodowa
kultura lokalna
dobra kultury
przemysły kultury
Milenijne Cele Rozwoju ONZ
prawa człowieka
Opis:
The article refers to two UNESCO conventions adopted by Poland in recent years: The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of 2003 and the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions of 2005. On one hand, comparing the content of these documents allows better understanding of the keynote of the concept of safeguarding intangible national heritage applied by UNESCO, and, on the other hand, this guiding principle shows the long distance covered while shaping the vision of cultural heritage over forty years from the establishment of the Convention on Safeguarding the Cultural and Natural Heritage in 1972. To complete the picture, UNESCO’s “Memory of the World” Programme of 1992, concerning safeguarding the documentary heritage, including the digital heritage, must be mentioned. These documents capture the diverse landscape of human cultural heritage, being complementary to each other. They are permeated by the principles of the protection and promotion of the heritage to varying degrees: equality, diversity, equivalency, share in the sustainable development, importance of an individual creator, and also an important role of the local community in this process. They indicate the evolution of the development conditions based on the cultural awareness, sense of identity, formed in the process of gradual identification of one’s own tangible and intangible heritage. They emphasize the possibility of a significant participation of culture in development. The Preamble to the Convention from 2005 contains provisions which formulate principles in a clear way, and also shed light on understanding other UNESCO conventions and programmes, especially on the particularly important Convention from 2003. The principle of non-evaluation, which applies to making new entries on the Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, so difficult to understand in the light of the experience related to the application of the criteria for making new entries on the World Heritage List, in accordance with the Convention on Protection of the Cultural and Natural Heritage from 1972, gains importance in the perspective of “cultural diversity forming a common heritage of humanity” and being “a mainspring for sustainable development for communities, peoples and nations”. The Convention emphasizes the importance of culture for social cohesion; developmental role of exchanges and interactions between cultures based on freedom of thought, expression and information, as well as diversity of media; the importance of linguistic diversity; the importance of vitality of cultures, including for persons who belong to minorities and indigenous people, as “manifested in their freedom to create, disseminate and distribute their traditional, cultural expressions and to have access thereto, so as to benefit them for their own development”. These statements give special meaning to the main thoughts of the Convention of 2003, which indicates the fundamental importance of the local community and individual carriers in ensuring vitality of the intangible heritage as a basic condition for its protection. Hence the differences in determination of goods added to the lists established on the basis of the Convention of 1972 and of 2003. In the first case, the dominating principle is the principle of selection of the most outstanding works in a given field, based on the methodology determined by specialists using the criteria of European historical and aesthetic tradition. In the case of the Convention of 2003, there was a clear evolution towards the recognition of the values of cultural phenomena rooted in the local context, proving, first of all, the diversity and authenticity of these phenomena, with their significance in creating the culture for the local community and as a manifestation of their identity, and, with the use of tools for the protection of these phenomena/ elements, may participate in the dialogue of cultures on the national and global scale. The process of the implementation of the Convention gives a huge chance to prepare a methodology consistent with the assumptions of the Convention of 2003, by means of activities that aim at creating the national register of the intangible heritage, and thus recognize, disseminate and maintain the richness of intangible culture in Poland which, as a result of a well conducted cultural policy consistent with the principles of the Convention of 2005, should be present in the developmental processes of our country in a creative manner.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 5-18
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
"Monumentum", T. I, 1967; T. II, 1968; T. III, 1969 : [recenzja]
Autorzy:
Lenard, Barbara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539190.pdf
Data publikacji:
1970
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
„Monumentum” 1967-1969
historyczny ośrodek Budy
zabezpieczenie zabytków na wypadek Wojny
Konwencja Haska
niszczenie kamieni
prawodawstwo Stanów Zjednoczonych w zakresie ochrony zabytków
rekonstrukcja ruin w Seibalu
architekt-restaurator
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1970, 2; 148-153
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
WOJENNE STRATY DZIEŁ SZTUKI KOŚCIOŁA KATOLICKIEGO W WIELKOPOLSCE
WARTIME LOSSES OF ART WORKS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN GREATER POLAND
Autorzy:
Łuczak, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539496.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
wojenne straty
straty dzieł sztuki
konwencja haska
straty wojenne w Wielkopolsce
niszczenie zabytków sakralnych
grabież zabytków sakralnych
konfiskata mienia
profanacja budynków kościelnych
dewastacja wyposażenia kościołów
rewindykacja strat wojennych
Opis:
The devastation and plunder suffered by the Catholic Church in Greater Poland during World War II affected buildings as well as all types of outfitting and equipment. Architectural objects were damaged in the course of wartime operations or pulled down upon the basis of decisions made by the Nazi occupation authorities. Certain monuments of art were gathered in storerooms or transported to the Reich, while the remaining objects were used for economic purposes or systematically destroyed. The effects of the ensuing damage, looting and scattering of works of sacral art are discernible up to this very day. Just as topical is the restoration of art works plundered during the second world war, which continue to remain outside the frontiers of Poland.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2004, 1-2; 115-123
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 20

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies