Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Zalasińska, Katarzyna." wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
KAMIL ZEIDLER, MACIEJ TRZCIŃSKI, „WYKŁAD PRAWA DLA ARCHEOLOGÓW” Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2009
KAMIL ZEIDLER, MACIEJ TRZCIŃSKI, “LAW FOR ARCHAEOLOGISTS” Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2009
Autorzy:
Zalasińska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535997.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Kamil Zeidler
Maciej Trzciński
„Wykład prawa dla archeologów”
ochrona zabytków archeologicznych
Opis:
The book market has recently witnessed the appearance of an exceptional publication written by two outstanding lawyers and comprising a complex presentation of legal regulations associated with archaeology. This is the first such work issued in the past few years wholly concerned with the legal aspects of the activity of archaeologists in Poland. In accordance with the accepted construction of the book its authors first discussed archaeology against the backdrop of the legal protection of historical monuments, laws concerning museums as well as numerous other regulations. The second part of the publication focuses on the most prominent international documents pertaining to archaeology, with particular attention paid to the European convention on the protection of the archaeological heritage, signed by Poland. The book ends with an examination of selected problems associated with the profession of an archaeologist, including training, ethics and the popularisation of archaeology. The greatest asset of ”Wykład prawa dla archeologów” is its depiction of an extensive legal context. The authors did not limit themselves to selected regulations of the statute of 23 July 2003 on the protection of historical monuments but also identified all other regulations which archaeologists could encounter in their daily work, scattered throughout the entire domain of law and relating to, i.a. maritime economy, arms and ammunition, cartography, as well as roads and highways. The book also delves into the controversial question of the turnover involving archaeological monuments. Let us note that the authors did not merely list the regulations but also proposed their own assessments, often formulating critical comments and their own stand on such contemporary controversial issues as the definition of the archaeological monument. The complex outline of legal problems concerning archaeology portrays the range of the system of the protection of monuments, disclosing its gaps and eventual lack of cohesion and, at times, also a disturbing lack of effectiveness. The reviewed publication may contribute to improving the legal awareness of the widely comprehended milieu of archaeologists and indubitably enhance the outcome of their activity. Hopefully, the titular book will be followed by similar studies addressed to, e.g. conservators of monuments.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 4; 99-100
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Decentralizacja zadań z zakresu ochrony zabytków – stan obecny i perspektywy zmian ustroju administracji konserwatorskiej
Decentralisation of tasks in the field of conservation of monuments – current state and perspectives for changing the conservation administration system
Autorzy:
Zalasińska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537029.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ustrój administracji konserwatorskiej
organy ochrony zabytków
decentralizacja
conservation administration system
monument conservation authorities
decentralisation
Opis:
Decentralisation of tasks in the scope of conservation of monuments underwent three phases: in 1990, 1998 and 2003. They were accompanied by alterations in the conservation administration system. Changes in the systemic position of monument conservation authorities – at the central and local level – are a subject of justified criticism of the conservation milieu. The question about direction of changes of indicated administrative structures remains valid. Systemic changes should include a decentralisation of certain tasks of Voivodeship Conservators of Monuments. The proposal of the new model of monument conservation, discussed in this article, has been presented during the II Conservators Congress.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 2; 163-170
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ochrona miejsc światowego dziedzictwa w prawie polskim – plan naprawczy
Protection of world heritage sites under Polish law – restructuring plan
Autorzy:
Zalasińska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539637.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Pomniki Historii
miejsca światowego dziedzictwa
prawo
Opis:
According to the Convention on protecting world heritage sites, adopted in Paris on 16 November 1972, only domestic regulations may ensure the adequate management and protection of world heritage sites stated in the UNESCO World Heritage List. This article describes the effectiveness of Polish legal tools, in particular those that apply to the protection of the Monuments of History. It also addresses the current legal issues of the management of world heritage sites.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 127-134
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„PRAWNA OCHRONA DZIEDZICTWA KULTUROWEGO POLSKI – DOŚWIADCZENIA I WYZWANIA XXI W.” Ogólnopolska konferencja naukowa, Warszawa, 27 lutego 2009 r.
”THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE IN POLAND – THE EXPERIENCES AND CHALLENGES OF THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY” National Scientific Conference, Warsaw, 27 February 2009
Autorzy:
Zalasińska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539659.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Prawna ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego Polski…
konferencja dotycząca prawnej ochrony dziedzictwa
karnoprawna ochrona zabytków
Opis:
The national scientific conference on ”The Legal Protection of the Cultural Heritage in Poland – the Experiences and Challenges of the Twenty First Century”, held in Warsaw on 27 February 2009, was organised by the Chair of the Administration and Protection of the Natural Environment in the Faculty of Law and Administration at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw and the Warsaw Seminar on Administration Axiology. The partners of the organisers were the National Heritage Board of Poland, the Centre for the Protection of Public Collections, and the Horyńska & Partners Law Firm. The conference was attended by more than 200 persons, including representatives of the conservation environment, lawyers and museum experts. The papers were followed by the acceptance of the text of the end declaration. The rank which the organisers of the meeting granted to it and the presence of the most outstanding Polish lawyers specialising in the legal protection of the cultural heritage testify to the significance of the state of Polish legislation for conservation administration.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 2; 5-6
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
INTERES INDYWIDUALNY A INTERES PUBLICZNY – KONFLIKT WARTOŚCI W PRAWNEJ OCHRONIE ZABYTKÓW
INDIVIDUAL AND PUBLIC INTEREST – A CONFLICT OF VALUES IN THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
Autorzy:
Zalasińska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536755.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
LEGAL PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS (POLAND)
konflikt wartości w prawnej ochronie zabytków
interes publiczny a interes indywidualny
prawo własności
zasady konserwatorskie
zasada minimalnej niezbędnej ingerencji
polityka konserwatorska
zasada proporcjonalności
Opis:
In the Polish law system, cultural heritage (historical monuments) and the property law are not absolute values. The conservation administration is thus compelled to continually search for a compromise. An useful directive for delineating the limits of permissible intervention into historical substance is the principle of proportionality derived from the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, which assumes the usefulness, necessity and proportional nature of the accepted limitations. This is a tool for seeking an optimal solution that would remain in accord with the requirements and purposes of the protection of historical monuments. At the same time, it must be noted that the conservation administration is obligated to maintain such a balance of public and individual interest which would not undermine the essence of the protected value (the very core of historical value), defined upon the basis of suitably conducted historical studies of the given monument.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 2; 83-87
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies