Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "multi-criteria" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    Evaluating a computer application that aids multi-criteria decision making
    Autorzy:
    Rajiansyah
    Filcek, Grzegorz
    Ramsey, David M.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/33922499.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    multi-criteria analysis
    SMART
    AHP
    ANP
    system usability
    Opis:
    In this article, we describe and assess the implementation of several methods of multi-criteria decision-making using a web-based computer application. Such an application makes it easier to determine the effectiveness of decisions. The methods adopted in this application are SMART (Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique), AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), and ANP (Analytic Network Process). Each of these methods has distinctive characteristics in determining the best alternative for the user. This study assesses the feasibility of each method in the application. The application is assessed based on functionality, reliability, efficiency, and usability. (1) Functionality is tested according to the appropriateness of the decisions made, (2) Reliability is assessed using stress testing, (3) Efficiency is assessed according to the computational effort, and (4) System usability is tested according to the user's answers to the Computer System Usability Questionnaire authored by J.R. Lewis. This research results in a decision support system based on SMART that has been appropriately tested and is ready for use.
    Źródło:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2023, 18; 47-76
    2084-1531
    Pojawia się w:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Revisiting Green Supplier selection publications from the last decade (2010-2022): a structured review and bibliometric study.
    Autorzy:
    Chen, Yen-Tsang
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206831.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    green supplier selection
    multi-criteria decision-making
    structured review
    bibliometric analysis
    Opis:
    Almost ten years have passed since some seminal structured literature reviews about multi-criteria decision-making for green supplier selection were published. We aimed to investigate the evolution of intellectual structures in this field through a structured literature review and bibliometric analysis using publications between 2010 and 2022. We noted that mathematical and analytical approaches are still dominating, and the complexity of the methods has increased. Bibliometrically, their theoretical foundation and techniques are the same despite the change of leading papers over time. Our contribution consist in extending earlier studies and discussing the evolution of the field.
    Źródło:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2022, 17; 9-33
    2084-1531
    Pojawia się w:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Complementarity of the graphical analysis for interactive aid and dominance-based rough set approach applied to the classification of non-urban municipalities
    Autorzy:
    Boudreau-Trudel, Bryan
    Zaras, Kazimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2027760.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    Dominance-based rough set approach
    Graphical analysis for interactive aid
    Management decision support
    Multi-criteria analysis
    Opis:
    Graphical analysis for interactive aid (GAIA) and the dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA) are compared as methods of explaining the solution to a multi-criteria ranking problem obtained using the preference ranking organization method for the enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE). The classification of 52 municipalities in Northern Quebec in terms of the socioeconomic situation is based on three attributes: home conditions, employment and demographic potential. The classification provided to the decision maker is aggregated information. To facilitate decision-making, the problem is first considered as a sorting task, in which municipalities are distributed into three categories: best (B), worst (W) or intermediate (I), based on the PROMETHEE ranking. In order to improve the position of a municipality thus categorized, the decision maker needs information that will answer the questions: What criteria are relevant to the municipality? What criteria are in conflict? What are the critical values of the criteria? We show that GAIA and DRSA provide convergent and complementary information that allow enrichment of the answers to these questions.
    Źródło:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2020, 15; 79-92
    2084-1531
    Pojawia się w:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dematel as a Weighting Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Autorzy:
    Kobryń, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578580.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory method
    Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Metoda DEMATEL
    Wielokryterialna analiza decyzyjna
    Opis:
    Modelling of a decision-maker’s preferences in multi-criteria decision analysis is performed using weights that reflect the relative importance of the given decision criteria. The determination of accurate values of the weights is therefore of considerable importance. Numerous means and methods are used for this purpose, such as: the entropy method (i.e., the method of objective weights), the Simos method, the SWARA method, the ANP or AHP methods, and many others. This paper analyses the DEMATEL method, frequently used to identify cause-and-effect relationships. Nowadays, it is often used in multi-criteria decision analyses. In the opinion of some authors, DEMATEL may be useful also to determine the weights of criteria. However, the approach presented by these authors has certain drawbacks. The present paper proposes a different approach to the weighting procedure using DEMATEL. Using numerical examples, it also presents weights determined by this method and compared to those obtained using the AHP method.
    Źródło:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2017, 12; 153-167
    2084-1531
    Pojawia się w:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Development and Evaluation of an AHP Model for Software Systems Selection
    Autorzy:
    Uzoka, Faith-Michael E.
    Akinnuwesi, Boluwaji A.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578532.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    Analityczny proces hierarchiczny (AHP)
    Funkcjonalność
    Koszt
    Wielokryterialna analiza decyzyjna
    Analytical hierarchy process
    Cost
    Functionality
    Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Opis:
    Decision-making in the field of information systems has become more complex due to larger number of alternatives, multiple and sometimes conflicting goals, and an increasingly uncertain environment. Software systems play unique roles in the translation of corporate strategic and tactical plans into actions. We present the results of a study designed to develop and evaluate an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model to support decision making in the selection of appropriate software system to meet organizational needs. Our results show the viability of the AHP methodology in software system/project selection, and points to the importance of functionality (35.26%), quality (22.00%) and usability (19.34%) criteria in the overall decision process. Cost and vendor service did not seem to exert significant weight in the decision matrix.
    Źródło:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2019, 14; 108-127
    2084-1531
    Pojawia się w:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Manufacturing Programs Using Analytic Network Process (Anp)
    Autorzy:
    Ocampo, Lanndon A.
    Clark, Eppie E.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/578485.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
    Tematy:
    Wielokryterialne podejmowanie decyzji
    Produkcja zrównowazona
    Rozwój zrównoważony
    Analityczny proces sieci
    Multi-criteria decision-making
    Sustainable manufacturing
    Sustainability
    Analytic network process
    Opis:
    Evaluation o f programs initiated by manufacturing firms that are geared toward sustainability is worthy o f attention in research due to the current global demands o f addressing not just economic growth bu t environmental and social burdens. This paper a ttempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework using the hierarchical structure o f sustainable manufacturing (SM) indicators set developed by the US National Institute o f Standards and Technology (US NIST) and a multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) approach, the analytic network process (ANP). ANP is deemed appropriate, aside from the multi-criteria nature o f the problem, because o f the presence o f subjective components that are interrelating in complex relationships. A real case study is carried out in a semiconductor manufacturing firm in the Philippines in the evaluation o f its programs toward sustainability. The results show that the creation and implementation o f cleaner production technologies are considered the most relevant programs. Developing energy-efficient products and adopting lean six sigma programs are considered second o n the list. This paper proposes that sustainability is achieved by formulating strategies that enhance customer and community well-being v ia addressing environmental concerns especially o n toxic substance, greenhouse gas (GHG) and air emissions. The contribution o f this paper consists in providing an evaluation framework which is comprehensive enough to capture real-life complex decision-making processes. Limitations and possibilities fo r future research are also presented in this paper.
    Źródło:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making; 2014, 9; 101-122
    2084-1531
    Pojawia się w:
    Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies