Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "english law" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Azyl w angielskim prawie karnym (XIII–XVI w.)
Autorzy:
Złamańczuk, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621831.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
sanctuary, English criminal law
Opis:
The paper analyzes the privilege of sanctuary in English criminal law between the 13th and 16th centuries. The general privilege of sanctuary belonged to all churches, chapels and churchyards. Any felon who had taken sanctuary could remain there for forty days. During that time he had to declare to the coroner whether he would stand trial or abjure the realm. If he chose the latter, he then had to confess his guilt before the coroner, swear to leave the country and never return without the king’s license. He was assigned the nearest port from which he should leave the country. If, during this forty days privilege of sanctuary, or while he was en route to the seaside, he was arrested and arraigned, he might plead the privilege of sanctuary. The private sanctuaries, created by a grant either from the Pope or from the king, usually imposed no time limit and gave protection for life. The sanctuary, therefore, could be used as a convenient base for planning criminal activities. No doubt, the privilege of sanctuary was frequently abused. As a result, judges became more hostile to the plea of sanctuary and in 1534 the privilege was taken away from all traitors. Sanctuary and abjuration disappeared in the Tudor period. In 1624, it was enacted that no sanctuary or privilege of sanctuary be hereafter admitted or allowed in any case.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2011, 10; 47-69
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Fibrosa S.A. v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd (1942). Spółka z Kresów przed Izbą Lordów
Fibrosa S.A. v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd (1942). The Company from Kresy (Polish Eastern Borderlands) Before the House of Lords
Autorzy:
Halberda, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621676.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
historia prawa, Anglia, bezpodstawne wzbogacenie, common law
legal history, England, English law, common law, restitution, unjust enrich- ment
Opis:
The paper discusses Fibrosa S.A. v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd (1942), a case considered as one of several landmark cases in the English law of restitution. What was at stake in litigation before the House of Lords was whether a Polish plaintiff should recover a prepayment transferred pursuant to a contract that had become frustrated because of the outbreak of war in 1939. The lords had to decide on the application of two potentially dissonant doctrines – frustration and total failure of consideration. But what made the Fibrosa case famous was an obiter dictum delivered by lord Wright. This eminent judge declared that English law should provide remedies for unjust enrichment. That is the very reason why the case is still being cited by the lawyers today.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2015, 14, 1; 197-217
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kodyfikacja i unifikacja polskiego prawa czekowego
Autorzy:
Jastrzębski, Robert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621819.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
cheque (or check in American English); Polish Cheques Law; 1931 Geneva Conventions; cheque’s functions; bill of exchange
Opis:
The article presented deals with legal, economic and historical aspects of Polish cheques law. The study is divided into five parts. Three of them concern a general issue of codification and unification of law in reborn Poland after the 1st World War, the international unification of cheques law, as well as they give an outline of form and nature of a cheque (or check in American English) as a type of bill of exchange, and depict various cheque’s functions, such as payment, currency, guarnantee and credit ones. The fourth part comprise three sections: the state of cheques law at the first period of the Second Republic of Poland (1918–1924); the Polish cheques law – a decree passed by the President of the Republic of Poland (14th November 1924), and finally the Act of Cheques Law – a bill enacted by the Polish Parliament (28th April 1936). The activity of the Polish Commission of Codification is regarded as the most important for legislative results in this branch of law. The attempt of international simplification and unification of law relating to cheques took place in Geneva (1931). On 19 March 1931 three conventions concerning this matter were signed: 1) the Convention providing a Uniform Law for Cheques (with two annexes and a protocol); 2) the Convention for the Settlement of Certain Conflicts of Laws in connection with Cheques (with a protocol); 3) the Convention on the Stamp Laws in connection with Cheques (and a protocol). Poland is of part these conventions and the Polish Cheques Law of April 28, since 1936 still is in force without essential changes, is consistent with these regulations.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2011, 10; 99-117
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies