Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Crimen" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Wincentego Skrzetuskiego mowa Przeciwko Kroloboystwu
    Wincenty Skrzetuski’s Speech Against Regicide
    Autorzy:
    Organiściak, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621400.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
    Tematy:
    Wincenty Skrzetuski, Oświecenie, królobójstwo, crimen laesae maie- statis, przestępstwa polityczne
    Wincenty Skrzetuski, Enlightment, regicide, crimen laesae maiestatis, poli- tical crimes
    Opis:
    Wincenty Skrzetuski, a member of the SchP convent, was an outstanding educationist, historian, lawyer and political writer. In Mowy o główniejszych materiach politycznych, issued in 1773 and in a handbook published from 1782–1784 Prawo polityczne narodu Polskiego, he discussed the problem of prevention of the King’s authority. He discussed the issue in the context of the attempted abduction of King Stanisław August Ponia- towski in 1771. His reflections indicate that he was mostly following older views on the crime of regicide and contrary to humanitarian ideas he argued on using the death penalty against all, with no exception, who took part in regicide. Skrzetuski mentioned the fact of not very wide competences of the elective Polish king, but he didn’t follow the Enlightment’s concept of the King’s power. Thus he followed the Catholic concept of the monarch’s power. He justified the full ban of regicide by rational reasons, as well as the reasons coming from the law of nature and from political rules.
    Źródło:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2015, 14, 2; 229-244
    1732-9132
    2719-9991
    Pojawia się w:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Von der Konstitutionalisierung von Nulla poena, nullum crimen sine lege in Art. 116 WRV (1919) zu dessen Umkehrung in ein Nullum crimen sine poena durch das NS-Regime
    From the Constitutionalization of the Principle of Legality nulla poene, nullum crimen sine lege Principle within the Weimar Constitution to the Reversal to a Principle of nullum crimen sine poena by the Nazi Regime
    Autorzy:
    Heger, Martin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108883.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-06-15
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
    Tematy:
    nulla poena sine lege
    nullum crimen sine lege
    RStGB
    WRV
    Reichstagsbrandverordnung
    Reichsgericht
    Reichstagsbrandprozess
    Opis:
    The principle of Legality (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) is the most fundamental principle of German criminal code since it was codified in the Bavarian Criminal Code 1813 for the first time. With the Foundation of the German Empire in 1871 it became an integral part of the new German Penal Code (Reichsstrafgesetzbuch). It was constitutionalized in 1919 as a fundamental right with Art. 116 of the Weimar Constitution. It was unchallenged till the Nazi regime came to power. Not within the Empowerment Act but with other legal measures resulting from the burning of the Parliament (”Reichstagsbrand”) on 28 February 1933 till 1935 on, the Nazi regime changed the principle step by step from nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege to nullum crimen sine poena. They made Analogy in disfavor of the accused person possible and they stated criminal offences with retroactivity. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court of Justice (Reichsgericht) accepted the new provisions and used it as a basis for its sentences. After WW II the allies nullified the Nazi provisions. With Art. 103 § 2 of the new (West-)German constitution from 1949 nulla poena sine lege has been constitutionalized again. The Paper deals with that development with a special focus on the role of the Reichsgericht as the highest body of judges, who were trained in the times before the Nazis came to power.
    Źródło:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2021, 20, 2; 9-20
    1732-9132
    2719-9991
    Pojawia się w:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Die Weimarer Reichsverfassung und das Verbot rückwirkender Strafverschärfung
    The Weimar Constitution and the Prohibition of a Retroactive Harsher Punishment
    Autorzy:
    Kuhli, Milan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108876.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-06-15
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
    Tematy:
    Weimar Constitution
    criminal law
    nullum crimen sine lege
    nulla poena sine lege
    principle of legality
    Opis:
    The principle “nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege” is one of the core principles of German criminal law and constitutional law. However, the history of this principle is quite varied. This article will focus on an essential part of this history, namely on the version of this principle in the Weimar Constitution of 1919. It will be shown that the principle of legality of criminal law was indeed expressed in that constitution, but that the exact scope of application of this constitutional principle was quite unclear. In this regard, it was uncertain whether the Weimar Constitution also prohibited the retroactive application of criminal laws to those cases for which a more lenient penalty was provided at the time of the offense. This ambiguity of the Weimar Constitution finally became apparent in 1933 in the so-called Reichstagsbrandprozess (Reichstag fire trial). The issue in these criminal proceedings was whether the burning of the parliament building in Berlin (February 27, 1933) was punishable by death, although this sanction was not provided at the time the crime was committed. In this essay, it will be shown that the National Socialists had to go to considerable effort to be able to ignore prohibitions on retroactivity. This undermining of the principle “nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege” forms an important example of the willingness of the legislature to negate essential protective principles of law in the Third Reich.
    Źródło:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2021, 20, 2; 45-56
    1732-9132
    2719-9991
    Pojawia się w:
    Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies