Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Constitution" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 30
Tytuł:
Konstytucyjny system organów państwowych Republiki Litewskiej w pierwszych latach niepodległości (1918–1926)
Autorzy:
Prokop, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621248.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Lithuania, constitution, history
Opis:
The purpose of the article is to present the constitutional development of the Republic of Lithuania after the First World War (1918–1926). This period may be divided into two parts: period of provisional constitutions (1918–1922) and period of the Constitution of Republic of Lithuania, which was enacted on August 1, 1922 and abolished in fact by a coup d’état in 1926. The parliamentary system of government was adopted by the first provisional constitution, which was enacted by the Taryba (Council of State) on November 2, 1918. The second provisional constitution was enacted on April 4, 1919. The institution of the President of the State was introduced by virtue of this constitution. The third provisional constitution was enacted by the Steigiamasis Seimas (Constituent Assembly) on June 10, 1920. The Constitution of Republic of Lithuania adopted parliamentary system of government, which was known in provisional constitutions. The unicameral parliament (the Seimas) was the most important body of state authority. The President of the Republic was elected by the Seimas. He could be dismissed by the Seimas, too. The Cabinet of Ministers was appointed by the President. The Cabinet of Ministers had to get the vote of confidence from the Seimas. The Seimas could give the vote of no confidence, too. In this case the Cabinet of Ministers had to hand in its resignation. In practice the political scene was dominated by the Christian Democratic Party. It lost general election only in 1926. A coup d’état, which took place some months later, indicated the end of democratic system of government.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2009, 8; 89-108
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Fundamental Rights and Latvian Constitution (1918–1934)
Autorzy:
Pleps, Janis
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621186.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Latvia, constitution, fundamental rights
Opis:
The Latvian road towards inclusion of the fundamental rights catalogue in the constitution started with proclamation of the state on November 18, 1918. The initial transitional constitutions already included according to their laconic style rather extensive guarantees of the fundamental rights. Mostly that means guarantees for national minorities. In the inter-war period, the catalogue of the fundamental rights was not considered as a significant component of the constitution content. The norms of the catalogue were generally perceived as “declarative slogans”, which had little practical significance. Much greater importance was assigned by the politicians and jurists to the laws adopted by the parliament with regards to the procedure of implementing certain fundamental rights. Latvian Constitutional Assembly has included “The Basic regulations regarding rights and regulations of the citizens” as a second part of the Constitution. The German Weimar Constitution of August 11, 1919 was used as a pattern for the draft of this part of the Constitution. The draft of the second part of Constitution prescribed a range of civic and political individual rights and freedoms. Parallel to that, the draft of the second part of the Constitution contained articles, which prescribed the state responsibility to protect the nationally-cultural autonomy of minorities, monuments of art, history, and nature, as well as marriage as the foundation of the family. The second part of the Constitution also dealt with the some social matters. Unfortunately, the second part of the Constitution was not adopted, leaving the regulation of this matter for the upcoming generations, which was completed only ten years ago.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2009, 8; 11-26
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Legal Protection of Life in the Constitutions of the Republic of Poland of March 17, 1921 and April 2, 1997
Autorzy:
Ożóg, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27308706.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
legal protection of life
Polish Constitution of 1921
Polish Constitution of 1997
Opis:
The issue of legal protection of life from Article 38 of the 1997 Constitution is one of the most important dilemmas of modern Polish law. This issue was already regulated in the March Constitution. The purpose of the article is to present the normative content of the legal protection of life on the basis of both constitutions. The research objective is to determine the importance of the two constitutions in providing legal protection of life in the context of the tasks of the ordinary legislature and the importance of judicial decisions. The text confronts the assumptions of the system legislator with lower–level regulations. Particular attention has been paid to the issue of assessing the compatibility of these solutions with the constitution’s design. Consideration was given to the influence of international organizations on the content and implementation of the protection of life in the Polish legal order. The study includes an analysis of the literature on the subject. The dogmatic and historical-legal method was used. The deliberations take into account the weaknesses and strengths of entrusting the judiciary with the constitutional task of defining the normative content of the protection of life. Contemporary public disputes in this matter should prompt greater efforts in clarifying constitutional solutions. It is worth bearing in mind the experience of the 1921 Constitution.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2022, 21, 2; 153-176
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pozycja ustrojowa Rady Państwa w Konstytucji PRL z 22 lipca 1952 r.
Autorzy:
Bożyk, Stanisław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621234.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Council of State, constitution 1952
Opis:
The position of the Council of State in the constitution from 1952 has been modeled on organs which existed in the states of so-called “real socialism”. It was based on the theory of the unity of state authority and on the theory of supremacy of the representative organs over other state bodies. The Council of State was, together with Sejm, the main state organ, but Sejm was regarded as a supreme organ. The Council of State was directly subordinated to Sejm, which could control its activity. It was described as a “smaller body” of Sejm, because only MPs could be elected to the Council of State. Its role and position was determined by the constitutional competences. The most important of them were connected with the replacing Sejm’s functions, such as passing the decrees, which had the same force as the acts of parliament. The Council of State was also a collective head of state, but its activity on this field de facto had no importance for its real position.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2009, 8; 161-174
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Конституционный аспект эволюции пограничных войск в 1945–1965 гг.
The Constitutional Aspect of the Evolution of the Border Protection Forces 1945–1965
Autorzy:
Zawadzki, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27310186.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Border Force
Polish Constitution
law
security
Opis:
Before I proceed to further detailed and developed arguments, I would like to present the main research problem involving the following question: how did the Border Protection Forces evolve in the years 1945–1965 from the perspective of the legal system and the constitutional law in particular. The constitution referred to above is not the basic law “as such”, in common parlance, but it is the constitution present in the course of the evolution of the legal status of the Frontier Protection Forces. This article is mainly focused on this constitution, although, apart from that, it contains the spectrum of legal and constitutional schemes adopted in different periods of the functioning of the Border Guard Forces in their constitutions. It is therefore immanent to present the process of the functioning of the Border Guard Forces – the origin and evolution of legal norms in the light of the constitution and the whole system of law, as well as the changes taking place in the system of law in the time-space between 1945 and 1965. Taking into account the defined objectives, it turned out to be necessary to present the work from a historical perspective. The chronology of facts is important for the discussed subject matter, as it helps to systematize the deliberations. The structure of the work has been adapted to the above principles of this publication. It begins with a legal-historical part introducing the subject of the tradition of constitutionalism in Poland. It presents the reasons for the creation and the process of subordination of border formations to various institutional solutions, and systematizes the legal and organizational transformation of the Border Protection Forces created in 1945 as a separate type of troops by the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Internal Affairs as part of the People's Army of Poland. The Border Protection Forces repeatedly revised its structural-bureaucratic subordination from the Ministry of National Defence through the Ministry of Public Security to the Ministry of the Interior and vice versa. The general research method became a legal-historical method to reconstruct the past state of affairs, the evolution of the legal status of the Border Protection Forces.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2023, 22, 2; 247-264
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Constitutionality in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes/the Kingdom of Yugoslavia – Between Covert and Overt Dictatorship
Autorzy:
Savić, Sanja
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108880.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-06-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (SCS)
Kingdom of Yugoslavia
the 1921 Constitution
the 1931 Constitution
dictatorship
Opis:
The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes was created on December 1, 1918 by proclamation of Regent Alexander I Karadjordjevic. The most important step regarding the organization of the newly formed state was the adoption of the constitution. The first constitution of the newly formed state was adopted on June 28, 1921, and in science it is usually called the Vidovdan Constitution. Due to a series of internal problems, on January 6, 1929, the king suspended the Vidovdan Constitution, dissolved the assembly and banned the work of political parties, and justified the coup by the highest national and state interests. The transition to an open dictatorship did not solve any of the political, economic, or national problems that led to the crisis. Despite the fact that the king announced his return to the constitutional order as soon as possible, this would happen only after two years. With the enactment of the constitution on September 3, 1931, there was no democratization of Yugoslav society, but the king’s open dictatorship was replaced by a constitutional one. The existence of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes/Yugoslavia in the period 1918–1941 in a political sense, was marked by the changes of a covert and open dictatorship, whereby the proclaimed democratic rights and freedoms represented only a show for the public. Through the paper, the author will analyze those constitutional provisions and the king’s actions that indicate this.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2021, 20, 2; 21-28
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Duty of Loyalty to the State or the ‘Polish Section’ in the 1937 Estonian Constitution
Autorzy:
Siimets-Gross, Hesi
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108811.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-06-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
‘loyalty to the state’ section
1935 Polish Constitution
1937 Estonian Constitution
authoritarian regime of Konstantin Päts
Opis:
There is a common comparison between the constitutions of the authoritarian regimes of Poland (1935) and Estonia (1937). The ideological model of the 1937 Estonian Constitution, especially in the section on loyalty to the state, was the 1935 Polish Constitution; for this reason, this section was also called the ‘Polish Section’. Compared to the first, 1920 Estonian Constitution, the 1937 Constitution was much more restrictive of basic rights, in particular through its general orientation and attitude. It was precisely in this that the so-called “loyalty to the state” section (§ 8) played a special role, affecting the whole chapter by its very nature, because it could, in its wording – and according to the example of Poland – constitute a general border clause on fundamental rights and freedoms. This article analyses specifically the ‘loyalty to the state’ section but first a short overview about historical background will be given. Secondly, the drafting of the section 8 of the Estonian Constitutions in the committees’ will be described and analysed, and thirdly, the discussions in the National Assembly will be summarized.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2021, 20, 2; 113-128
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Constitution of the Kingdom of Serbia from 1888
Autorzy:
Savić, Sanja
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27308722.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
constitution
king
National Assembly
civil rights
parliamentarism
Opis:
In the paper, the author analyzes the adoption procedure, characteristics and significance of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Serbia from 1888. After the Kingdom of Serbia acquired the status of an independent and sovereign state by the decision of the Congress of Berlin, all restrictions regarding its constitutional arrangement disappeared. Emphasizing that the constitution of 1869 was passed illegally during his childhood, and that it gave the people too much freedom, King Milan Obrenović initiated the adoption of a new constitution. Created as a result of a political agreement between King Milan and the Radical Party, the constitution was supposed to secure the interests of both parties, i.e. the survival of the ruling dynasty on the throne and the introduction of a parliamentary system. The constitution was intended to establish a balance between the rights of the people, the ruler and the assembly. By arranging the political system of the state on the principles of parliamentarism and democracy, which sought to satisfy the interests of different layers of the Serbian citizenry, and by providing favorable conditions for further democratization of political life, the constitution of 1888 represented one of the most advanced constitutions in Europe at that time. However, practice has shown that parliamentary democracy requires a more developed social environment than the one that existed in the Kingdom of Serbia at the end of the 19th century.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2023, 22, 1; 535-548
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Instytucja związków partnerskich w świetle przepisów Konstytucji z 1997 roku
Institution of civil partnership in the light of the rules of the Polish Constitution of 1997
Autorzy:
Litwin, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621154.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
związek partnerski, konstytucja, rodzina, małżeństwo
civil partnership, constitution, family, marriage
Opis:
The article presents the problem of conformity of civil partnership, i.e. the legally reco- gnized relation of two adults other than marriage, with the selected rules of the Polish Constitution of 1997. The initial analysis concerns the conformity with Article 1 (the Republic of Poland as the common good of all its citizens), Article 2 (the principle of a democratic state ruled by law), Article 25 Section 2 (the principle of impartiality of the public authorities) and Article 32 (the principle of equality before the law and prohibition of discrimination). A particularly important problem is the conformity of civil partnership legalization with Article 18, enforcing the state to protect marriage, family and parenthood. The conformity of civil partnership with Article 31 Section 3, dealing with the possible limitations of constitutional freedoms and rights of the citi- zens is also discussed. In the final part of the article, the author presents assumptions concerning the possible legal regulations of civil partnership. In his opinion, there are no constitutional or legal obstacles to creating legally recognized civil partnerships in Poland, although the partners should have such rights which are presently available to couples living in informal unions, according to the rules of civil law.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2014, 13, 2; 167-191
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontrola konstytucyjności w polskim prawie – między systemem common law a systemem kontynentalnym
Constitutionality Control in Polish Law – Between Common Law and Continental Systems
Autorzy:
Koniecko, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27308699.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
constitution
constitutionality
constitutionality control
konstytucja
zgodność z Konstytucją
kontrola konstytucyjności
Opis:
W doktrynie polskiego prawa konstytucyjnego i w orzecznictwie przez wiele lat panował spór co do tego, czy sądy powszechne i administracyjne, uprawnione są do badania w toku orzekania zgodności przepisów z Konstytucją. Negatywna odpowiedź na to pytanie prowadziłaby do wniosku, iż jedynym uprawnionym do tego organem, pozostaje Trybunał Konstytucyjny. Zagadnienie to wiąże się z ustrojem organów państwowych, ich pozycją ustrojową oraz przypisanymi im kompetencjami. Co więcej, przyjęcie poglądu, iż sądownictwo jest uprawnione do kontroli zgodności normatywnej aktów niższego rzędu, skutkowałoby częstszym stosowaniem tego aktu w praktyce, co odpowiadałoby niewątpliwie zasadzie nadrzędności i bezpośredniej stosowalności Konstytucji. Konstytucja byłaby w ten sposób stosowana nie tylko w relacjach między organami władzy publicznej oraz organami a obywatelami, ale także w stosunkach horyzontalnych, między podmiotami prawa prywatnego. Celem pracy pozostawało dokonanie analizy i systematyki prezentowanych poglądów w zakresie dopuszczalności w polskim prawie stosowania kontroli rozproszonej oraz udzielenie odpowiedzi na pytanie, któremu ze stanowisk należy przyznać słuszność. W tym celu konieczne stało się wyjaśnienie takich pojęć jak Konstytucja, zgodność z Konstytucją, a także przedstawienie charakterystyki różnych rodzajów i modeli kontroli konstytucyjności. Szczególnie istotne okazało się tu dokonanie przeglądu nie tylko poglądów przedstawicieli doktryny, ale także, a nawet przede wszystkim, stanowisk przedstawicieli wymiaru sprawiedliwości, w tym zarówno sądów, jak i trybunałów, jako najbardziej zainteresowanych w wyjaśnieniu tej kwestii.
In the doctrine of Polish constitutional law and in the jurisprudence, there has been a dispute for many years as to whether common and administrative courts are entitled to examine, in the course of adjudication, the compliance of regulations with the Constitution. A negative answer to this question would lead to the conclusion that the only body authorised to do so is the Constitutional Tribunal. This issue is connected to the system of state bodies, their systemic position and the competencies ascribed to them. Furthermore, the adoption of the view that the judiciary is authorised to control the normative compliance of acts of a lower order, would result in a more frequent application of that act in practice, which would undoubtedly correspond to the principle of supremacy and direct applicability of the Constitution. The Constitution would thus be applied not only in the relations between the organs of public authority and the organs and citizens, but also in the horizontal relations, between the subjects of private law. The aim of this paper was to analyse and systematise the presented views concerning the admissibility of the application of diffused control in Polish law, and to answer the question, which of the positions should be upheld. For this purpose it has become necessary to explain such notions as the constitution, compliance with the constitution, as well as to present the characteristics of different types and models of constitutionality control. It turned out to be particularly important here to review not only the views of representatives of the doctrine, but also, and even primarily, the positions of representatives of the judiciary, including both courts and tribunals, as those most interested in clarifying this issue.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2022, 21, 2; 397-429
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Raisons de la creation et de l’evolution des formations frontalieres polonaises dans l’entre-deux-guerres
Reasons for the Creation and Evolution of Polish Border Formations in the 20th-century Interwar Period
Autorzy:
Zawadzki, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108995.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-06-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Polish Border Guard
Polish constitution
constitutional law
institutional law
country border
Opis:
In establishing the thematic scope of this work, I assumed that its subject would be the process of the formation of border services in interwar Poland. This means a deliberate and complete disregard for the essentially distinct administrative role played by the border guard. The presentation of the Border Guard from an administrative perspective changes the situation so profoundly that a thorough discussion of its implications would certainly double the volume of the publication. A superficial treatment of the administrative issue would lead to misunderstandings. Furthermore, a superficial omission of the administrative issue was deemed necessary because the formations were mainly military in nature. Before going into details and elaborations, I would like to present my main research objective, which is the following question: what was the evolution of the legal status of Polish border formations in the inter-war period? In view of this objective, it is necessary to present the work from a historical perspective. The chronology of the facts is important for the subject matter, as it serves to systematise the considerations. The structure of the work and the research method were adjusted to the above-mentioned assumptions of the publication, which shows the reasons for the creation and the process of transformation of the border formations in relation to various types of institutional solutions, up to the moment of the creation of the Border Protection Corps and the Border Guard Corps, operating under these names until 1939. The potential conclusions resulting from this chapter concern: the presentation of the institutional construction of the border formations in the years 1918–1939 and the demonstration that in the interwar period they were the main organs of the Second Polish Republic, which guaranteed the inviolability of state territory and the security of the citizens on the subordinate territory.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2021, 20, 2; 201-229
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Instytucje demokracji bezpośredniej w państwach autorytarnych w międzywojennej Europie
Direct Democracy Institutions in Authoritarian States in Pre-War Europe
Autorzy:
Kulesza, Władysław T.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621917.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
państwo autorytarne, konstytucja, referendum, demokracja bezpośrednia.
authoritarian state, constitution, referendum, direct democracy.
Opis:
The aim of the paper is to present direct democracy institutions provided for in the con- stitutions of authoritarian states in pre-war Europe, or applied in practice by authoritar- ian states. Such institutions were included in the constitutions created by authoritarian governments in Lithuania (1928), Austria (1934) and Estonia (1937) or used in practice: in Portugal (1933), Greece (1935), Estonia (1936) and Romania (1938). Two authoritar- ian states included in their constitutions provisions on opinion–giving and law–giving referenda. These were Austria (1934) and Estonia (1937). However, these provisions had never been applied in practice. Seeking the genesis of the phenomenon described in the paper, it is necessary to go back to the start of the 19th century and point to the reign of Napoleon Bonaparte, initially as First Consul and then Emperor of France. The nature of these republican and subse- quently imperial plebiscytes was clearly anti-parlamentary and anti-democratic.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2016, 15, 2; 127-141
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Parlamentarny system rządów w Polsce i Niemczech po I wojnie światowej
The parliamentary system of government in Poland and Germany after the First World War
Autorzy:
Dunaj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621568.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
parlamentarny system rządów, II Rzeczpospolita, Republika Weimarska, konstytucja marcowa, konstytucja weimarska
parliamentary system of government, the II Republic of Poland, the Weimar Republic, the March Constitution, the Weimar Constitution
Opis:
The end of the First World War coincided in Poland and Germany with the birth of a parliamentary system of government. However, while Poland adopted classical political devices derived from the then model a la française, which at that time dominated, Germany decided to create an original parliamentary system of government, with the strong position of a president elected by universal and direct election. It soon turned out that in both countries this resulted in a “democracy that came too soon”. Quite quickly, crisis and the collapse of parliamentary rule occurred. The subject of the analysis undertaken by the author is the reflection on the solutions of the German Constitution of 1919 and the Polish March Constitution of 1921, which shaped the parliamentary system of government, with particular reference to the premises that led to crisis and the collapse of parliamentary democracy.
Koniec I wojny światowej zbiegł się w Polsce i Niemczech z narodzinami parlamen- tarnego systemu rządów. O ile jednak Polska przyjęła klasyczne urządzenia ustro- jowe zaczerpnięte z dominującym wówczas wzorcem a la française, o tyle Niemcy zdecydowali się na stworzenie oryginalnego systemu rządów parlamentarnych, z silną pozycją prezydenta wybieranego w wyborach powszechnych i bezpośrednich. Okazało się niebawem, iż w obu państwach zaszedł przypadek „demokracji, która przyszła za wcześnie”. Dość szybko nastąpił kryzys i upadek rządów parlamentar- nych. Przedmiotem analizy podjętej przez autorkę jest refleksja nad rozwiązaniami niemieckiej konstytucji z 1919 r. i polskiej konstytucji marcowej (1921) kształtujący- mi parlamentarny system rządów ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem przesłanek, które doprowadziły do kryzysu i upadku demokracji parlamentarnej.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2018, 17, 1; 43-59
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Polscy uczeni prawnicy międzywojenni o ustroju i prawie Trzeciej Rzeszy
Polish Inter-War Scholars-Lawyers on the Political System and the Law of the Third Reich
Autorzy:
Maciejewski, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621914.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
nazizm, prawo, państwo, ustrój, Trzecia Rzesza.
Nazism, law, state, constitution, Third Reich.
Opis:
The article describes the views of a number of selected Polish scholars-lawyers on the Nazi government and law during the period 1933-1939. It presents, in turn, opinions on this subject matter formulated by Maciej Starzewski, Waclaw Makowski, Konstanty Gr- zybowski, Andrzej Mycielski, Ludwik Krajewski, Tadeusz Bigo, Leon Halban, Stanislaw Golab, Leopold Caro, Ignacy Czuma, Marian Z. Jedlecki and Zygmunt Cybichowski. Almost all of them expressed strong criticism concerning the governmental system and law of the Third Reich, usually correctly commenting on and characterizing changes occurring in those fields in Germany since 1933. In particular, Polish inter-war scholars- lawyers emphasized the unitary and authoritarian, or even totalitarian, model of the Nazi government and the special systemic position of the supreme leader held by Adolf Hitler. With respect to Nazi legal doctrine and the legal system founded upon it, they pointed out its reliance on racism and nationalism, its refutation of the fundamental assumptions of Roman law, legal positivism and the ideology of natural law, the oblit- eration of the demarcation line between public and private law and the adoption of the principle of the primacy of common good (German national community) over individual interests. The analyzed discourse on those matters accentuated legal nihilism, decision- ism and voluntarism (considering them to be typical of Nazism) and considered those approaches to be inimical to the modern tradition of Western-European legal science.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2016, 15, 2; 85-126
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Constitution of the Confederate States of America, 1861
Autorzy:
Stolicki, Dariusz M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621332.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Confederate States; Confederate Constitution; Montgomery Convention; secession crisis of 1860–1861; American constitutional tradition.
Opis:
The Confederate Constitution of 1861 has been an important development in American constitutional law. The Montgomery Convention that drafted the constitution chose not to create an entirely new document, but instead to copy and revise the United States Constitution of 1787. Nearly verbatim identity of most provisions of the two texts highlights the differences arising from deliberate alterations introduced by the Confederates. This article analyzes those changes in light of their political and legal background and classifies them into three broad categories: first, amendments designed to “restore” the balance of federal and state powers to the states’ rights ideal envisioned by Southern political leaders and to check further growth of federal authority; second, provisions designed to augment or clarify constitutional protections of slavery and thereby address- ing the direct causes of secession; and third, governmental innovations mostly related to separation of powers and fiscal affairs (such as line-item veto, executive budget, or the single subject rule) that were not directly related to the major sectional controver- sies of the antebellum era, but instead addressed what the framers of the Confederate Constitution believed to be practical deficiencies of the 1787 Constitution. While the first two categories are of interest mainly to historians of the antebellum period, as embodying to a large extent the Southern view of the Constitution (though falling short of endorsing Calhounian ideas of nullification and concurrent majority), the last one also influenced many state constitutions adopted during and after the Civil War, thereby permanently contributing to development of American constitutional tradition.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2013, 12; 145-190
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 30

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies