Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Sambor" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Duchowieństwo unickie eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1609
Greek-Catholic clergy of Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy from 1596 to 1609
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1064711.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
duchowieństwo
unici
diecezja przemyska
eparchia przemysko-samborska
unia brzeska
Greek-Catholic clergy
Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy
Union of Brest
Opis:
Orthodox bishop of Przemysl and Sambor Michał Kopysteński (1591-1609) did not join the union of Brest in 1596. Therefore, the Przemyśl-Sambor Emparchy did not have Greek-Catholic bishop until 1609, when Atanazy Krupecki was nominated.The article presents the history of the first phase of the church union in Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy (1596-1609). This issue has been poorly explored in historiography. Many historians thought that before 1609, the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor had no Greek-Catholic priests and Greek-Catholics. This view has been verified. Also the myth that the Greek-Catholic Church initially consisted only of bishops, and was deprived of ecclesiastical structures and followers was challenged. The Church Union of Brest was supposed to combine the two Churches - Catholic and Orthodox. As a result of non-acceptance of the Union by the two bishops and a large part of the Orthodox faithful, there were formed two parallel structures of the Eastern Church: Orthodox and Greek-Catholic. This complex legal and religious situation forced the Orthodox popes of the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy to face the choice between the Ortodox Church or acceptance of ecclesiastical union. The latter was equivalent with the conversion from the Orthodox to the Greek Catholic denomination. Following the adoption of the Union of Brest state authorities outlawed the Orthodox Church, and recognized as the only legitimate one the Greek-Catholic Church. Pope recognizing the authority of the Metropolitan of Kiev, which was of Greek-Catholic denomination, had to object to his hitherto Orthodox bishop. Moreover, the bishops and priests who did not accept the union of church, were excommunicated by metropolitan of Kiev. An important role in determining denomination of a particular parish had landowners of lands where churches were located. The landowner (the king, the nobles and the clergy) was called. "Ktitor", and had the right to choose a pope. After 1596, decisions on filling the church by the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic priests were taken in accordance with the principle of cuius regio, eius religio. Union developed gradually throughout the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy thanks to the support of ktitors. This graduall evolutionary development of the union was followed by natural generational changes that took place in the individual parishes. No information was found on Orthodox priests forcibly removed and replaced by the Greek-Catholics. From 1598 to 1609 Greek-Catholic popes are confirmed in seven decanates of the eparchy, mostly in the towns and villages belonging to the king and Stanisław Stadnicki from Żmigród. Identified were 22 known by name Greek-Catholic priests, plus four popes who were probably of Greek-Catholic denomination. Recognized popes accounted for only about 2% of all priests (both Greek-Catholics and Orthodox) from the eparchy. However, for all Greek-Catholic churches operating at that time this is a significant percentage of the Greek-Catholics parishes. These figures have not been known in historiography yet. During this period, the vast majority of churches and clergy of the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy remained Orthodox. Nevertheless, only 19 known by the name Orthodox priests and eight who were probably Orthodox were identified as a result of a query. The number of identified Greek-Catholic and Orthodox priests are comparable, although on the Orhodox should be much more information in the sources. There was also found information about 12 known by name popes who lived by 1596 but there was no hints about their attitude to the union and 18 popes from the period after 1596, whose denomination can not be determined. Orthodox churches served by popes known by name were of a minor percentage of the total number of operating the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic churches. So far, historians have failed to determine the number of churches that existed in that period in the Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy and all data are based on estimations. Therefore, creation of an inventory of the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic churches is an important research proposal. Another objective should be to determine the number of priests serving in those churches. The article shows religious specificity of Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy over 13 years (1596-1609). Most of the processes had not been completed in that period, so they should be considered in the long term. The final adoption of the church union between 1691 and 1693 ended disputes among Orthodox and Greek-Catholics in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2013, 20; 135-167
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia kościelna w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej za czasów biskupa Prokopa Chmielewskiego (1652–1664)
The Church Union in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor at the time of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1652–1664)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065079.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Prokop Chmielewski
unia kościelna
diecezja przemyska (greckokatolicka)
Opis:
The church union in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor at the time of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1652–1664) is a neglected page of the historiography. There is no evidence to indicate parts of the diocese where Unites lived, as well as, the number of the churches is unknown, there is also no information about the Uniate priests involved in various levels of the hierarchy. The reign of bishop Chmielewski fall on difficult period of dual power in the eparchy of the Przemyśl-Sambor the Eastern Church. Simultaneous existence of the bishops of the Orthodox and Uniate denomination meant that they competed for the same cathedral, churches and worshippers. This was due to the complicated internal situation of Poland, involved in a civil war with the Cossacks, then in the war with Russia. The aggressors fought the church union in the name of the Eastern Orthodox Church, interfering in the internal affairs of Poland. This influenced the policy of King Jan Kazimierz towards the Church Union and the Orthodox Church. As the cathedral in Przemyśl was occupied by the Orthodox, the Uniate bishop Prokop Chmielewski resided in Walawa. He tried to maintain a semblance of hierarchical structure, thus, he called cathedral kryłos. He exercised jurisdiction over decanate of Krosno, Leżajsk, Muszyna and Oleszyce. Unites were the most represented in the royal estates, particularly in the district of Krosno, as well as, in the noble goods belonging to the Families of Fredro, Korniakta, Krasicki, Lubomirski, Sieniawski and Zamoyski. These are initial findings on the Uniate Church in the days of bishop Chmielewski. This matter requires further detailed research.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2015, 22; 169-202
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1664–1670
The Union in the eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor in the years 1664–1670
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065191.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Antoni Terlecki
Jakub Susza
unia kościelna
greckokatolicka diecezja przemyska
church union
Greek Catholic Diocese of Przemyśl
Opis:
The article shows the state of the Uniate Church in the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor during the transitional period between the death of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1664), and taking the diocese by Bishop Jan Małachowski (1670). At that time, Bishop Antoni Terlecki (1664–1669) ruled this diocese, and after his removal from the office – Jakub Susza, bishop of the neighboring Uniate diocese of Chełm, who was the administrator of the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor until the appointment of the next Bishop Ordinary. The rule by the Bishop Terlecki fell in the most difficult period in relations between the Uniate and the Orthodox churches. In the diocese of Przemysl advantage gained Orthodox under the strong leadership of bishop Antoni Winnicki, later Metropolitan of Kiev. The cathedral and most of the parishes in Przemyśl were in their hands. Orthodox took over another Uniate churches, and tried to expel the Uniate bishop from a residence in Walawa in next to Przemyśl, what they finally succeeded in 1669. An account of the bishop Terlecki’s governance is not clear, and in fact it has to be divided into two parts. The positive assessment gains the first one, launched in the final period of the rule of his predecessor – the bishop Prokop Chmielewski. Antoni Terlecki, first as coadjutor (1662), then Bishop Ordinary (1664) ably led the Uniate part of the Diocese of Przemyśl. He became involved in the efforts to strengthen the Uniate Church in Poland, in cooperation with the Uniate bishop of Chełm Jakub Susza. Antoni Terlecki was well prepared to deal with the high ecclesiastical functions. He was a basilian and a doctor of theology. However, over the time his negative traits as rowdiness and drunkenness prevailed. He neglected the duties of the bishop and voluntarily left the diocese of Przemyśl. As a result, the Uniate Metropolitan of Kiev, first imposed on Terlecki church curse, and then took his episcopal functions. Jakub Susza was entrusted with the administration of the Uniate eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor. At the time of the Bishop Terlecki falls regression in the development of the church union in the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor. Compact complexes of the Uniate churches were operated on the outskirts of the vast Eparchy, in its western and northern parts. There were 65 established churches confirmed by sources as Uniate and consecutive three more likely to be Uniate. A total of 45 identified with the name Uniate priest served (they cumulated several functions simultaneously).
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2016, 23; 179-205
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kapłani uniccy w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej za rządów biskupa Atanazego Krupeckiego (1610–1652)
Uniate priests in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor under the reigns of Bishop Atanazy Krupecki (1610–1652)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1064819.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
przemyska diecezja prawosławna
przemyska diecezja greckokatolicka
przemysko-samborska diecezja
unia kościelna
Atanazy Krupecki
Opis:
The article lists the Uniate priests of the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor under the reign of Bishop Atanazy Krupecki (1610–1652). This issue was overlooked in the existing historiography. The query was performed in the sources, that allowed the religious identification of a single priests, and thus, it was possible to distinguish whether the one was Uniate or Orthodox. The identification was carried out on the basis of the records of parishes created by the owners of the goods where the church was located. There was collected information about 95 Uniate priests and 12 more who probably were Uniates. Krupecki was the one who created the Uniate hierarchical structure in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor. This structure covered all the offices and the entire area of the vast diocese. The name register of the Uniate clergy allowed to determine the names of the following: one bishop ordinary, two bishops coadjutor, two vicars-general, nineteen kryłoszan [‘Russian cathedral canons’], three protopop [Russian dean] and two of them most probably Uniate, ten basilians monks incl., two monastery igumens, and additionaly one basilian nun (probably Uniate), and 71 popes (and additionally 11 popes probably Uniate) as well as three deacons. There were more functions and offices than exercising them priests, because many priests cumulated benefices and ecclesiastical dignities. Majority of the Uniate popes were to be found in the royal estates. The information about the 52 Uniate popes (and further 5 popes who probably were Uniates) was found in 11 districts. Most of the popes were in the royal estate called Sambor estate (21 Uniate popes and one probably Uniate). From the gentry villages was retrieved information on 5 Uniate popes (and one probably Uniate). In cities and towns belonging to the Latin Bishops of Kraków and Przemyśl cities and to the Uniate bishop of Przemyśl were indentified 10 popes of the Uniate denomination (and 4 probably Uniate). Some priests served more than one church. Under the care of the Uniate popes were 52 churches, including 6 in the cities and 46 in the villages. Among the collaborators of bishop Krupecki who occupied important offices in the eparchy were priests from outside the diocese of Przemyśl, who changed the rite from the Latin into the Greek one. The group was joined by only a few local Russians, who took the position in cathedral kryłos of Przemyśl. Many popes received parishes under the condition of their accession to the Union. The information about the Uniate priests cannot be treated as a closed list. The list will be developed in a result of further archival queries.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2014, 21; 137-170
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unicka eparchia przemyska. Uwagi w związku z książką Wioletty Zieleckiej-Mikołajczyk, Gdzie Wschód spotkał się z Zachodem. Dzieje i organizacja unickiej diecezji przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1772, Toruń 2021
On history of Przemyśl Uniate eparchy. Comments with regard to book by Wioletta Zielecka-Mikołajczyk “Where East met West”. History and organization of Przemyśl-Sambor Uniate diocese in 1596-1772, Toruń 2021.
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22784042.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-13
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
artykuł recenzyjny
diecezja przemyska greckokatolicka
eparchia przemyska
unicka diecezja przemyska
Kościół unicki
unia brzeska
Opis:
Artykuł recenzyjny książki Wioletty Zieleckiej-Mikołajczyk, Gdzie Wschód spotkał się z Zachodem. Dzieje i organizacja unickiej diecezji przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1772, Toruń 2021
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2022, 29, 29; 263-305
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies