- Tytuł:
- Case study about economic order quantities and comparison of results from conventional EOQ model and response surface-based approach
- Autorzy:
-
Yıldız, R.
Yaman, R. - Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/406756.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2018
- Wydawca:
- Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
- Tematy:
-
economic order quantity
Pareto analysis
response surface
demand forecasting - Opis:
- This study involves the implementation of an economic order quantity (EOQ) model which is an inventory control method in a ceramic factory. Two different methods were applied for the calculation of EOQs. The first method is to determine EOQ values using a response surface method-based approach (RSM). The second method uses conventional EOQ calculations. To produce a ceramic product, 281 different and additive materials may be used. First, Pareto (ABC) analysis was performed to determine which of the materials have higher priority. Because of this analysis, the value of 21 items among 281 different materials and additives were compared to the ratio of the total product. The ratio was found to be 70.4% so calculations were made for 21 items. Usage value for every single item for the years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively, were obtained from the company records. Eight different demand forecasting methods were applied to find the amount of the demand in EOQ. As a result of forecasting, the EOQ of the items were calculated by establishing a model. Also, EOQ and RSM calculations for the items were made and both calculation results were compared to each other. Considering the obtained results, it is understood that RSM can be used in EOQ calculations rather than the conventional EOQ model. Also, there are big differences between the EOQ values which were implemented by the company and the values calculated. Because of this work, the RSM-based EOQ approach can be used to decide on the EOQ calculations as a way of improving the system performance.
- Źródło:
-
Management and Production Engineering Review; 2018, 9, 3; 23-32
2080-8208
2082-1344 - Pojawia się w:
- Management and Production Engineering Review
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł