Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Suprasl" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Kodeks supraski wśród zbiorów biblioteki monasteru supraskiego. Kilka hipotez w sprawie czasu przybycia Minieji Czetnej z XI wieku do Supraśla
Autorzy:
Kierejczuk, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2167276.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Akademia Supraska
Tematy:
monaster supraski
Kodeks supraski
Supraśl monastery
Codex of Supraśl
Opis:
In 1498 some monks from the Kiev Pechersk Lavra came to Grodek to found a monastery, which was later transferred to Suprasl. The co-founders of this initiative were Alexander Khodkevich and the bishop of Smolensk, Joseph Soltan. At the beginning of the XVI century there were 40 monks. In 1505 the patriarch of Constantinople, Joachim confirmed the foundation of the monastery and of its church in a special tomos. Gradually the monastery was granted with lands and villages, acquired an important role among the monasteries of the country, maintained contacts with Mount Athos and other centres of religious life. It became itself a centre of theological thought. The monastery was famous also for its library and scriptorium. The founders of the monastery believed that copying, ornamentation and biding the books should be one of the principle works of the monks. With the time the library of the monastery acquired more and more books, among others also very rare manuscripts and parchment codices. It contained religious books (liturgical books, lives of the saints) as well as historical and chronicle materials. In 1823 Michael Bobrovsky, while making research on the collection of the library, found among the ancient books an XI century Cyrillic manuscript in Old Church Slavonic – the Chetnaya Menea for March.The volume was afterwards called Codex Suprasliensis after the place were it was found. The codex consists of 285 pages and contains 24 lives of the saints, 20 homilies of St. John Chrysostom as well as those of St Basil the Great, Photius and Epiphanius of Cyprus. There is no precise information concerning the place, time and author of the manuscript. Several theories though exist concerning when and how the codex arrived in the Suprasl monastery: it was a gift from the founder of the monastery, Alexander Khodkevich; it was brought from Mount Athos, Kiev Pechersk Lavra or a Bulgarian monastery; it was brought to the monastery at the time of its foundation; came in 1505 together with the tomos of the patriarch of Constantinople, Joachim; was given by the metropolitan Joseph Soltan during the consecration of the Annunciation church in 1511; arrived before 1532; was brought by Kievan ob Bulgarian monks before 1557; was offered in 1582 by the Serbian and Bulgarian patriarch Gabriel; was given by the patriarch of Constantinople Jeremiah II in 1589; was brought to the monastery after 1557, before 1645 and remained there in 1668. The analysis of its copies and the notes written on it allows to follow the journey of the Codex Suprasliensis. Some of the theories are more probable than others, still the scientists cannot come up with one definite version of how and when the Chetnaya Menea came to the Suprasl monastery.
Źródło:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2011, Kościół prawosławny na Bałkanach i w Polsce – wzajemne relacje oraz wspólna tradycja, 2; 141-152
2082-9299
Pojawia się w:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Najważniejsze zmiany w wyposażeniu cerkwi Zwiastowania Bogarodzicy w Supraślu po wprowadzeniu unii brzeskiej
The Main Changes in the Interior of the Church of the Annunciation of the Virgin Mary in Suprasl After the Union of Brest Implementing
Autorzy:
Stawecka, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2171293.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Akademia Supraska
Tematy:
ołtarze boczne
tron
ambona
prezbiterium
Supraśl
ikonostas
Opis:
This text is a summary of stylistic changes as well as changes in spatial arrangements that took place in the main church of the Monastery of Suprasl in 17th and 18th century. In the article the key investments carried out in the sanctuary at that time are described in chronological order. The changes concern: the new sanctuary barrier (iconostasis), side altars, the throne for the bishop, the ambo, the chancel as well as the nartex.
Źródło:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2017, Cerkiew a asymilacja- swój i obcy, 8; 131-150
2082-9299
Pojawia się w:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Византийский богослужебно-певческий устав в Супрасльском Благовещенском монастыре (XVI в.)
Autorzy:
Густова, Лариса
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2167277.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Akademia Supraska
Tematy:
monaster supraski
bizantyjski regulamin
Suprasl monastery
Byzantine rubrics
Opis:
In the Byzantine Church there were many liturgical rubrics of the Great Constantinople church, Everghetidos, Athonite (or of the Holy Mountain), Studite, patriarchal (of the Holy Sepulchre), Costamonitou, skete, Studite-Alekseyev, of St Sabbas etc. Those rubrics were used in monasteries, sketes, cathedrals and parishes. Many of them existed simultaneously. Due to the changing church reality the place of the rubrics of the Great Constantinople church and of the Holy Sepulchre was taken by that of Jerusalem and later by Studite-Alekseyev rubrics. Before the XV century in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania the Great Constantinople and the Studite rubrics were enriched by the local liturgical traditions, even the ideological sense of many elements was changed and was assumed to be a part of autonomous, authentic ancient Russian religious life. At that time begins the reform of the liturgical rubrics, finished in the second half of the XVII century by patriarch Nikon. Starting from the XV century the Jerusalem rubrics in their Constantinopolitan version were introduced in the Russian Church. The reform of the liturgical rubrics in the Suprasl monastery, carried out by archimandrite Sergius Kimbar, was based on the liturgical indications of the Holy Mountain Typicon, Przemyśl Typicon, “tchastoslovs” of various Greek monasteries, as well as texts from “holy books of Church rules” in Slavonic. All the mentioned books were offered to the monastery by Joseph Soltan, the metropolitan of Kiev, Halych and all Russia. The reforms met some opposition from the brethren, in some cases justified, as certain changes were not based on the Church rubrics. Still in parish and in monastery churches of the Grand Lithuanian Duchy in the services there were a lot of elements coming “rather from the local habits than from the books”. One of the remarks made by archimandrite Sergius concerned the lack of readings from the Church Fathers during the Mattins and the Vigil. He questioned also the use of the Royal Doors, he introduced in Suprasl monastery churches the interior narthex etc. One can also notice the same Byzantine style changes in the Russian church culture, especially in choral music.
Źródło:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2011, Kościół prawosławny na Bałkanach i w Polsce – wzajemne relacje oraz wspólna tradycja, 2; 153-162
2082-9299
Pojawia się w:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies