Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Borkowski, Andrzej." wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
    Tytuł:
    Proces sądowy protosyngla i egzarchy patriarszego arcydiakona Nicefora Paraschesa Kantakuzena
    Autorzy:
    Borkowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2167227.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2011
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Supraska
    Tematy:
    Nicefor Parasches Kantakuzena
    Kościół prawosławny
    Polska
    Niceforos Parasches Cantacuzene
    Orthodox Church
    Polska
    Opis:
    Nikephoros was born around 1537 in Trikala in Thesalia. After the monastic tonsure in 1557, he went to study in the famous university of Padua. In 1572 he was nominated patriarch’s Exarch in Venice, though still remaining the administrator of patriarch Jeremiah. He arrived in Constantinople around 1580 at the time of return to the patriarchal throne of Jeremiah II Tranos. Jeremiah had an excellent knowledge of the level of the church life and of problems of the Slavs. Multilateral action against the efforts of Vatican to impose the new church calendar on the orthodox inhabitants of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was an excellent means to tighten the bonds with the distant province of the patriarchal throne. Jeremiah sent for the first time protosyncel Nikephoros, archimandrite Dionisios and their translator Theodore in order to obviate the problem and deliver patriarch’s letters addressed to the hierarchs as well as the orthodox faithful in the Commonwealth. In a decree of the Misonos synod in Constantinople of 1592 the patriarchs of the East expressed the necessity of sending to the Commonwealth the ecumenical patriarch’s exarch. Based on the common decision of the patriarch Jeremiah of Constantinople, Meletios of Alexandria and the representatives of Antiochia and Jerusalem the protosyncel Nikephoros was appointed for this post. He was assigned the first in the Church hierarchy, the eldest among the teachers and the protosyncel of the ecumenical throne with all the rights to intervene in the affaires of the diocese belonging to the 51patriarchate of Constantinople. He was also given the right to supervise, summon church trials and counsel in the matters of faith as well as in other church affaires. In 1595 Nikephoros set off for the Commonwealth, but was arrested and imprisoned while crossing the border. He managed to escape after 6 months. Then he strived to fortify and defend the faith, to propagate education. Moreover he was a lecturer at the Ostrog Academy, he dealt with the apostasy among the hierarchy. His activity made him many enemies, therefore Nikephoros was falsely accused of spying for the Turkish/Osman Empire, entering the Commonwealth against the king’s ban, usurping the role of the representative of the patriarch of Constantinople. During the law suit he was also accused of participating in the anti-union synod in Brest. Several prosecutors withdrew their accusations, even the judges were not sure that Nikephoros was guilty, therefore king Sigismund II Vasa could not give the court’s ruling and delayed it till more satisfying evidence would be gathered. In the meantime Nikephoros was kept in the stronghold in Malbork. Though Nikephoros was never proven guilty and despite numerous interventions of patriarch of Constantinople, of patriarch Meletios of Alexandria and of prince Constantine Ostrogsky as well as of many others, the patriarch’s Exarch for Commonwealth died in prison of hunger. He died like a martyr for having fought for orthodoxy against the powerful of the Commonwealth wanting to introduce the Church union.
    Źródło:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2011, Kościół prawosławny na Bałkanach i w Polsce – wzajemne relacje oraz wspólna tradycja, 2; 35-54
    2082-9299
    Pojawia się w:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Rola laikatu w procesie udzielania autokefalii
    The Role of the Laity in the Process of Autocephaly
    Autorzy:
    Borkowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2168705.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Supraska
    Tematy:
    laikat
    autokefalia
    Kościół prawosławny
    Sobór Ogólnoprawosławny
    patriarchat ekumeniczny
    Opis:
    The fundamental principle of the system of the Orthodox Church is the equality of the laity and the clergy who belong to the mystical body of Christ. The clergy and laity are invariably participating in the deaconia of the Church, in varying degrees and ministry, yet they are always equally among themselves brothers in the universal priesthood. According to this triple dignity, laymen participate in the following spheres of church life: ritual, teaching, administrative and legislative. One of the main conditions for autocephaly is the will of the laity. This fact should precede the process itself, by which we mean a clear declaration of the will of the laity, that is, the faithful of a local church striving to achieve autocephaly. In almost all resolutions of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from the 19th-20th about autocephaly of a particular church periphery there is clearly underlined the fact that the faithful have asked for it. There is no doubt that the term “believers” is understood to mean the same clergy and monks, as well as the laity. One-sided operation of one of the mentioned groups does not fulfill the above condition. In spite of this, the form of fulfillment of this condition can not be precisely defined, because it is strictly dependent on the political or other situation prevailing in a given place.
    Źródło:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2018, Rola laikatu w życiu Cerkwi, 9; 18-29
    2082-9299
    Pojawia się w:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Cele edukacyjne i wychowawcze nauczania religii prawosławnej w szkołach w latach 1918–1932
    Educational and Upbringing Purposes of Teaching the Orthodox Religion in Schools in 1918–1932
    Autorzy:
    Borkowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2171239.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Supraska
    Tematy:
    katecheza
    nauka religii
    Kościół prawosławny
    Opis:
    The general goal of teaching the Orthodox religion in schools after Poland gained independence in 1918 was to consolidate religious truths and deepen moral principles among children, so that in their later life they could work on deepening the truths of faith and take an active part in the life of the Church. A catechist should be not only a lecturer, but above all an example of the principles of Christian morality, be able to teach students at least the elementary basics of contemporary threats, point out differences with other faiths, and at the same time become a lecturer, apologist and missionary. In the process of teaching and upbringing, attention was paid to knowledge and attitudes that influenced the observance of the principles of faith. When teaching the Orthodox religion, the teacher always remembered the three most important goals: mind education, emotional education, and moralpractical education. The above hierarchy of values made it possible to further deepen the children’s religious knowledge, faith and lively and conscious participation in the services. The formulated goals of teaching the Orthodox religion in schools until 1932 reflected the spirit of the times and changes taking place in the Orthodox Church and the State.
    Źródło:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2020, Dzieci w kulturze duchowej Prawosławia, 11; 89-104
    2082-9299
    Pojawia się w:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wysłannicy patriarchy konstantynopolitańskiego na soborach w Rzeczypospolitej w XVI wieku
    Representatives of the Patriarch of Constantinople in the Orthodoxies Synods in Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 16th Century
    Autorzy:
    Borkowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2171220.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Supraska
    Tematy:
    Kościół prawosławny
    egzarcha
    Rzeczpospolita
    patriarcha Konstantynopola
    Opis:
    The offer of the deputies of the patriarch of Constantinople in the orthodoxies synods in Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is very important. The ecumenical patriarchs sent or appoint to the Kingdom of Poland in the 16th century yours messengers: Abrahamios, hieromonk Philipos, archbishop of Galata, bishop of Litea and Rendina Damascen, archimandrite Dionisios Rallis Palaiologos, archdeacon Nikiforos Parashis, patriarch’s translator Theodor, patriarch of Antioch Joachim V, archbishop of Domenik and Elasson Arsenios, metropolitan of Dyrrachium Paisios, bishop of Moglen Theofanes, bishop of Luck Cyril Terlecki, metropolitan of Kiev Michal, archbishop of Cyprus Laurentios, archimandrite Cyrillos Lucaris, prince Constantine Ostrogsky, bishop of Lvov Gedeon, archdeacon Cyprian, hieromonk Sofronios, hierodeacon Isaac, monk Ivan Vishensky. The patriarch of Constantinople Jeremiah II appointed a new metropolitan, took care function of the local Synod. The metropolitan Elassonos Arsenios worked as teacher in Lvov and published Grammar of the Greek language. The Church Union was officially declared at the Synod of Brest (1596) and the Polish authorities resorted to violent means in order to apply it hit against the Orthodoxy was the pass of all the bishops of the Orthodox Church in Poland excluding both of them into the union. Protagonist in the faith against the union was the patriarch of Alexandria Meletios Pigas and of course locally through a bitter correspondence. Nikiforos Parashis and Cyrillos Lucaris achieved to organize the antyunion Synod of Brest (1596) which condemned the bishops in union. After the Synod of Brest (1596) in different ways the patriarch’s exarches together with the Orthodox brotherhoods took over the role in saving the Orthodoxy. Through their participations in the Polish fight the patriarch’s exarches couldn’t erase the image of the union, but without doubt created and supported the strength for fight against the union keeping unquenched the flame of the Orthodoxy especially in the metropolis of Kiev.
    Źródło:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2014, Synody Cerkwi Prawosławnej w I Rzeczypospolitej, 5; 103-120
    2082-9299
    Pojawia się w:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Reforma kalendarza liturgicznego i jej recepcja w Kościele prawosławnym w Polsce
    The reform of the liturgical calendar and its reception in the Orthodox Church in Poland
    Autorzy:
    Borkowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2171311.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Supraska
    Tematy:
    kalendarz
    patriarchat ekumeniczny
    Rzym
    Jeremiasz II Tranos
    autokefalia
    Opis:
    Wisdom and discernment of ecumenical patriarch Jeremiah II Tranos has helped to safeguard the Orthodox Church and the faith against foreign influence of the non-Orthodox who have pursued solely to ensure their benefits. Orthodox believers in Polish Republic have obediently followed his orders consistently rejecting any novelties and aberrations of the Latin Church who has not accepted a method of dialogue preferring to use calendar reform as a measure to apply papal propaganda. Initial failure of the Roma has not restrained its policy on Orthodoxy. Active and uncompromising proselyte activity of Jesuit order has repeatedly led to tensions and fights between faithful of both Churches. Initial trial to impose the new calendar has turned into battlefield of pressure and persecution. In such a particularly critical period in history ecumenical patriarch Jeremiah II Tranos has himself rushed to the aid of Kiev Metropolis located within boundaries of the Polish Republic. Orthodox Church in Poland continued to use the traditional Julian calendar and adopted the Gregorian reform after a time on 12 April 1924, for the sake of convenience in international trade. Orthodox people of the Polish Republic have protested against the new calendar treating it as one of the main reasons of their struggle
    Źródło:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2013, Kalendarz w życiu Cerkwi i wspólnoty, 4; 77-89
    2082-9299
    Pojawia się w:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Sytuacja Patriarchatu ekumenicznego w obliczu przemian politycznych na Bałkanach i Azji Mniejszej na początku XX wieku
    Ecumenical Patriarchate situation in the face of political change in the Balkans and Asia Minor at the beginning of the twentieth century
    Autorzy:
    Borkowski, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2171227.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Supraska
    Tematy:
    Patriarchat ekumeniczny
    ludobójstwo Greków
    przesiedlenia
    wielka idea
    Opis:
    From the point of view of the substantive history of the Christian Church the most significant development in the life of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in the period following the Asia Minor Catastrophe and the expulsion of the largest number of its Orthodox flock from Turkey was the development of a model of a non-national Church in its jurisdiction: the communities dependent on it in Turkey and the diaspora were held together by a common faith and by the shared consciousness of belonging to the Orthodox tradition, not by national loyalties as it has been as a rule the case in the national Orthodox Churches, whose attitudes and behaviour have contributed to the unfortunate and spiritually indefensible identification of Orthodoxy with nationalism.
    Źródło:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2015, Cerkiew w drodze, 6; 109-114
    2082-9299
    Pojawia się w:
    Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies