Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Jeszke, Jaromir" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Towarzystwa naukowe a uniwersytety na łamach Rocznika Kasy im. Mianowskiego „Nauka Polska, Jej potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój” (1918-1947)
    Scientific societies and universities in the Yearbook of Józef Mianowski Fund “Polish Science. Its Needs, Organization and Development” (1918-1947)
    Autorzy:
    Jeszke, Jaromir
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089429.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    Polish scientific societies
    Polish universities
    Polish Science. Its Needs, Organization and Depeloment
    polskie towarzystwa naukowe
    polskie uniwersytety
    Nauka Polska. Jej Potrzeby, Organizacja i Rozwój
    Opis:
    The author analyzes the relations between scientific societies and universities in Poland in the interwar period. The source material is the Yearbook “Polish Science. Its Needs, Organization, and Development” published by the Józef Mianowski Fund in the years 1918-1947. An investigation of the relationships between scientific societies and universities offers excellent opportunities for interpreting the scientific activity in the Second Polish Republic. The connections between scientific societies and universities involved the centers for propelling scientific thought, where university chairs or scientific society committees played the leading role. Sometimes the works of non-university experts were important. The analysis of the material collected in the “Polish Science” also points to many other professional organizations (associations of professors, associate professors, or assistants). Many universities had societies supporting them. Gaining social support for universities was extremely important at the time.
    Źródło:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki; 2021, 66, 4; 65--82
    0023-589X
    2657-4020
    Pojawia się w:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Badacz i jego perspektywy interpretacyjne w studiach nad dziejami nauki
    The researcher and their interpretative perspectives in the studies on the history of science
    Autorzy:
    Jeszke, Jaromir
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2089485.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    historiography of science
    history of science
    cognizing cultures
    cognized cultures
    researchers' social roles with respect to the past
    homo metahistoricus
    historiografia nauki
    historia nauki
    kultury poznające
    kultury poznawane
    społeczne role uczonych wobec przeszłości
    Opis:
    A historian (also of medicine) should accept the values and canons of the studied culture, including medical ones, as their own. As Florian Znaniecki pointed out in his works, they should be the researcher’s highest authority. This means that the researcher should deviate from evaluating the ideas and practices of the studied culture from their own perspective. The category of minimal cultural imputation developed by Wojciech Wrzosek shows that it is not an easy process. However, the application of the subjective-rational perspective to the interpretation has already become an obvious approach. An open and much less obvious problem is the role of the historian of science when they venture to make comparisons between past and present scientifi c cultures. By doing so, do they still remain a historian, or - by undertaking such comparisons and evaluations - do they abandon the role, assuming the position of, for example, methodologist? The author of the article outlines the possibilities of separating these roles, presenting the attitude of a ‘methodologist’ who searches in the past for the roots and theoretical justifi cations for contemporary paradigms of their discipline, using the latter to evaluate the past. However, the possibility of a non-evaluative dialogue between the cognizing culture and the cognized culture is also shown, where the former also includes the specialist knowledge of a contemporary researcher interested in the past of their discipline. The historiography of a given science appears here as a record of the self-knowledge of a given generation of researchers - as their self-refl ection. As Jan Pomorski calls it, a researcher assuming such a role appears as homo metahistoricus in their field of study.
    Źródło:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki; 2021, 66, 2; 11--23
    0023-589X
    2657-4020
    Pojawia się w:
    Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies