Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Kamiński, Antoni." wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Etos dworu i „ludzi dobrze wychowanych”: epitafium dla inteligencji
    The Ethos of Nobility and of Well-Mannered People: An Epitaph for Polish Intelligentsia
    Autorzy:
    Kamiński, Antoni Z.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1372988.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-03-26
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    intelligentsia
    nobles' democracy
    modernization
    oligarchy
    ethos
    national identity
    patriotism
    nationalism
    cosmopolitism
    internationalism
    inteligencja
    demokracja szlachecka
    modernizacja
    oligarchia
    etos
    tożsamość narodowa
    patriotyzm
    nacjonalizm
    kosmopolityzm
    internacjonalizm
    Opis:
    The article is devoted to a critical analysis of current controversies concerning the Polish national identity, and the interpretation of the impact of nobles’ democracy on the demise of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. It considers the role of national identity as a factor influencing civic culture and, therefore, determining its usefulness in assuring the proper functioning of the constitutional order. The analysis assumes that (1) the current global order is the product of the emergence of nation-states; (2) that a nation-state cannot exist without civil society grounded in the concept of national identity and patriotism. Patriotism is opposed here to nationalism; similarly, cosmopolitism is opposed to internationalism. Patriotism and cosmopolitism are compatible and imply an open-minded, inclusive attitude to different national identities. Both nationalism with its focus on superiority of one’s own nation, and internationalism — rejection of the nation-state in the name of an imaginary global, stateless community — are exclusive. These both exclusive postures present a threat to civil society.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2018, 62, 1; 47-70
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Siły motoryczne rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego: refleksje na kanwie koncepcji Acemoglu-Robinsona
    The Driving Forces of Socio-Economic Development: Reflections in the Context of Acemoglu and Robinson’s Conception
    Autorzy:
    Kamiński, Antoni Z.
    Kamiński, Bartłomiej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373440.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-11-24
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson
    factors in socio-economic development
    politics and economics
    crisis of the Western world
    Daron Acemoglu i James A. Robinson
    czynniki rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego
    polityka a gospodarka
    kryzys świata zachodniego
    Opis:
    This paper critically assesses Acemoglu and Robinson’s framework for examining economic development. The framework is applied to cases taken from a period of more than two thousand years, yet it—and consequently its implementation—suffer from serious methodological flaws. First, the authors fail to define their basic concepts and terms precisely. Their choice of critical junctures generating breakthroughs is similarly limited to those that produced changes but ignores others that did not. Furthermore, their major claim that institutions are the only determinant of prosperity does not withstand scrutiny. Other factors, including the much-criticized ones of culture and geography, may be shown to be more critical under some circumstances. Last but not least, their failure to establish links between their framework and the literature on democracy and capitalism is rather striking. Juxtaposing their analysis and this literature could generate new insights. Nevertheless, this is not to suggest that their framework is ‘old wine in new bottles’. To the contrary, their analysis will undoubtedly stimulate further research into the complexity of relations between political and economic institutions and their impact on social and economic development.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2015, 59, 4; 145-162
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Are Defenders of Liberal Democracy Its Gravediggers?
    Autorzy:
    Kamiński, Antoni Z.
    Kamiński, Bartłomiej K.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/781995.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
    Tematy:
    liberal democracy
    illiberal democracy
    populism
    authoritarian populism
    libertarian populism
    cultural silent revolution
    citizenship
    democratic backsliding
    primaries
    nation state
    nationalism
    patriotism
    the rule of law
    immigration
    open borders
    globalization
    modernism
    post-materialism
    radical egalitarianism
    competitive individualism
    metropolitan elitism
    EUI Democracy Index
    Opis:
    Recent years have witnessed the publication of a number of research papers and books seeking to assess threats of electoral victories of anti-establishment politicians and political parties, described as authoritarian populists. This essay focuses on three books directly addressing the origins and threats of authoritarian populism to democracy. It consists of six sections and the conclusion. The first section presents findings (Norris and Inglehart) based on surveys of values of voters of various age cohorts concluding that authoritarian populism is a temporary backlash provoked by the post-materialist perspective. The second section examines the contention, spelled out in Levitsky and Ziblatt, that increase in openness of American political system produced,  unintentionally, a degradation of the American political system. The third section continues brief presentations focusing on to the causes and implications of “illiberal democracy,” and “undemocratic liberalism” (Mounk). The fourth section examines developments in the quality of democracy in the world showing that despite the decline in Democracy Indices, overall there was no slide towards non-democratic forms of government in 2006–2019. The next two sections deal with dimensions missing in reviewed books; the notion of nation-state, international environment, civic culture and, in particular, dangers of radical egalitarianism to democracy. The last section concludes with regrets that the authors ignored rich literature on fragility of democracy and failed to incorporate in their analyses deeper structural factors eroding democracy: by the same token, return to the pre-populist shock trajectory is unlikely to assure survival of liberal democracy.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2019, 63, 4; 151-176
    2300-195X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Społeczeństwo
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies