Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Budyta-Budzyńska, Małgorzata" wg kryterium: Autor


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Postpolityczna demokracja nieufnych. Na marginesie esejów Iwana Krastewa
The Post-Political Democracy of the Distrustful: Commentary on Essays by Ivan Krastev
Autorzy:
Budyta-Budzyńska, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373442.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-11-24
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
democracy
direct democracy
crowd-sourcing the constitution
crisis of democracy
Indignants
ruchy społeczne
demokracja
demokracja bezpośrednia
crowd-sourcing konstytucji
kryzys demokracji
oburzeni
social movements
Opis:
In his essays, collected in In Mistrust We Trust: Can Democracy Survive When We Don’t Trust Our Leaders? and Democracy Disrupted: The Politics of Global Protest, Ivan Krastev questions the state of contemporary democracy. He describes it as ‘post-political’ because while procedures are observed, democratic elections take place, and governments are sometimes replaced, nothing of substance changes in politics and voters lack any sense of having influence or that their votes actually matter. Democracy is obviously in crisis and a variety of solutions to this predicament have been proposed: even more elections more direct democracy, or more transparency. Or perhaps a remedy to the crisis of democracy will stem from protests and from ‘taking to the streets’—these being ‘alternate means’ of doing politics? Krastev criticizes all the above proposals, concluding that none is satisfactory or likely to restore trust in democratic institutions. Perhaps democracy ought not to be superficially improved, but instead rethought from the be ginning? The author points to several questions that should be taken into account in thinking about a new form of democracy. She also considers whether the mass protests of the 2010s were a new phenomenon and involved new ideas for doing politics, or were typical modern social movements, only on a global scale and employing novel instruments of mobilization.
Źródło:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2015, 59, 4; 163-178
2300-195X
Pojawia się w:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Polskie banki gniewu. Podziały społeczne w Polsce w perspektywie teorii Petera Sloterdijka
Polish Anger Banks: Social Divisions in Poland from the Perspective of Peter Sloterdijk’s Theory
Autorzy:
Budyta-Budzyńska, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1372983.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-03-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish political scene
Polish society
relative deprivation
anger of the marginalized
Peter Sloterdijk
polska scena polityczna
społeczeństwo polskie
względna deprywacja
gniew marginalizowanych
Opis:
The author reflects on the social divisions that — as sociologists have long predicted — can presently be observed in Poland. The author sees the source of the phenomenon in the mechanism of relative deprivation, which leads to disappointed expectations, or to people’s assessment of their own social or material situation as being worse in comparison to a reference group such as their contemporaries, neighbors, an elite, or a ruling class. Such a situation creates anger — here the author reaches for Sloterdijk’s concept — which is accumulated in “anger banks,” that is, in organizations or milieus that thrive on that anger. In the author’s opinion, this is the nature of the current Polish political scene. What is involved is the collective defense of individual and group dignity. The broad support accorded PiS (the Law and Justice party) in the 2015 elections should be analyzed in terms of the reacquisition of dignity by those who have been overlooked. However, the operating mode of the anger banks means that what previously occurred by omission and deafness is presently taking on the dangerous form of insulting and stigmatizing those who think differently. The author concludes that what is needed today, by all sides of the conflict, is a lesson in self-respect and respect for one’s opponents, the reconstruction of social relations within the community, and learning how to listen to and respect the opinion of adversaries.
Źródło:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2018, 62, 1; 289-305
2300-195X
Pojawia się w:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies