Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "pattern analysis" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-1 z 1
Tytuł:
Regionalisation of watersheds with respect to low flow
Autorzy:
Cupak, Agnieszka
Michalec, Bogusław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2174343.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Instytut Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy
Tematy:
cluster analysis
low flow
regional regression
residual pattern approach
watershed
Opis:
The aim of the study was to compare two grouping methods for regionalisation of watersheds, which are similar in respect of low flow and chosen catchments parameters (physiographic and meteorological). In the study, a residual pattern approach and cluster analysis, i.e. Ward’s method, were used. The analysis was conducted for specific low flow discharge q95 (dm3∙s-1∙km-2). In the analysis, 50 catchments, located in the area of the upper and central Vistula River basin, were taken. Daily flows used in the study were monitored from 1976 to 2016. Based on the residual pattern approach (RPA) method, the analysed catchments were classified into two groups, while using the cluster analysis method (Ward’s method) - into five. The predictive performance of the complete regional regression model checked by cross-validation R2cv was 47% and RMSEcv= 0.69 dm3∙s-1∙km-2. The cross validation procedure for the cluster analysis gives a predictive performance equal to 33% and RMSEcv= 0.81 dm3∙s-1∙km-2. Comparing both methods, based on the cross-validated coefficient of determination (R2cv), it was found that the residual pattern approach had a better fit between predicted and observed values. The analysis also showed, that in case of both methods, an overestimation of specific low flow discharge q95 was observed. For the cross-validation method and the RPA method, the PBIAS was -10%. A slightly higher value was obtained for the cross-validation method and models obtained using cluster analysis for which the PBIAS was -13.8%.
Źródło:
Journal of Water and Land Development; 2022, 55; 47--55
1429-7426
2083-4535
Pojawia się w:
Journal of Water and Land Development
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-1 z 1

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies