Temat: deliberative democracy - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: The Idea of Freedom in Radical and Delibe-rative Models of Democracy
Autorzy:: UFEL, WOJCIECH
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/628501.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
Tematy:: deliberative democracy, radical democracy, freedom, Habermas, Mouffe, pluralism, deliberation, postmodernism
Opis:: Basing on the idea of freedom brought by I. Berlin we can derive to classical models of democracy: liberal and republican. Refl ection on postmodern theories of democracy – radi-cally plural and deliberative – points that they do not strongly differ from the traditional ones, but rather give them new challenges. Radical democracy of Ch. Mouffe and E. Laclau praising pluralism and negative freedom is a deconstruction of a liberal model, while delib-erative project of J. Habermas, praising community and negative freedom, remains in a republican tradition. In the end of the article the author also presents the understanding of the educative role of society and tradition in both classical and postmodern models of democracy.
Źródło:: Journal of Education Culture and Society; 2012, 3, 1; 73-81
2081-1640
Pojawia się w:: Journal of Education Culture and Society
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Egalitarian Democracy between Elitism and Populism
Autorzy:: Cerovac, Ivan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/628180.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
Tematy:: Ranciere, democratic legitimacy, elitism, populism, epistemic proceduralism, deliberative democracy
Opis:: In his influential book Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy Jacques Ranciere builds a substantial critique of liberal regimes present in most Western countries. He finds them defective because: (1) they allow wealth and economic power of groups and individuals to influence public decision-making, making those with economic power an elite group; (2) they allow knowledge and expertise of groups and individuals to influence public decision-making, making those with epistemic power an elite group; (3) they allow and encourage social and economic conditions that make people inappropriate for decision-making on important issues, making those with certain characteristics thus acquired an inferior group. We focus on the Ranciere’s second objection by relying on Estlund’s epistemic proceduralis approach and claim that one does not have to embrace postmodernist idea of reducing reason to relations of power in order to present a substantial critique of our contemporary society. Furthermore, we argue that one does not have to base egalitarian democracy on postmodernist ideas that reject the truth-tracking potential of democratic procedures – egalitarian democracy is perfectly compatible with the idea of truth in politics.
Źródło:: Journal of Education Culture and Society; 2014, 5, 2; 31-42
2081-1640
Pojawia się w:: Journal of Education Culture and Society
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "deliberative democracy" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język