Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "memory politics" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10
    Tytuł:
    Polands Politics of History since 1989. Considerations - Challenges - Tools - Goals. Warsaw, June 12, 2018
    Autorzy:
    Chwedoruk, Rafał
    Dąbrowski, Franciszek
    Korkuć, Maciej
    Nowak, Andrzej
    Piekarska, Anna
    Suleja, Włodzimierz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956019.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    politics of history
    politics of memory
    Polska
    Communism
    World War II
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 13-32
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Between the Politics of History and Practice: Ukrainian Struggles with the Past. The Example of the Permanent Exhibition of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War
    Autorzy:
    Gontarska, Olga
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956021.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    decommunisation
    Second World War
    Great Patriotic War
    politics of memory
    museums in Ukraine
    Opis:
    In 2015, as a result of implementing the Ukrainian decommunisation laws, the official name of the Museum of the Great Patriotic War was changed to the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War. The current exhibition at the museum depicts internalisation of Soviet myths in Ukraine as well as the problem of no explicit guidelines from state authorities regarding an official narrative. Also, developing a new concept of a museum dedicated to the history of Ukraine in the Second World War has been impeded by the ongoing war in the eastern part of the country. This paper discusses mutual relations and mismatches between Ukraine’s politics of history and museum practices. The change of the latter is much more languid and complex than in the case of merely changing street names or dismantling old monuments and erecting new ones.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 265-280
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Contemporary History Discourses in Hungary after 1989
    Autorzy:
    Rainer, Janos
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956426.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Hungary
    communism
    democratic transition
    politics of memory
    1956 revolution
    József Antall
    Victor Orbán
    Opis:
    The article discusses the current position of Hungarian historiography towards the role of recent history in the Hungarian identity and its relationship to domestic policy. The democratic transition after 1989 contributed to a substantial change in historical scholarship through the dismissal of censorship, the opening of archives and the lifting of the ideological pressure on research. However, the change of the historical self-portrayal of Hungary after the fall of the communist regime was an element of the democratic transition. The author describes the process of the use of historical arguments in forming national attitudes and self-identity by several political circles in Hungary over the last three decades, with special attention paid to the activities and ideas of József Antall and Victor Orbán. The experiences of the 1956 revolution were initially focused on as an anchoring point for national identity after the fall of communism. In the course of these years, the centre of political attention shifted to the proposed anti-communist and anti-left wing interpretation of Hungarian history from March 1944 to May 1990, and, as author points out, it is aligned with the attitude of the ruling circles. The author notes the substantial state’s initiatives in the field of the politics of memory in recent years, especially in the early formation of the 1956 Institute (est. 1991), then the Institute of the 20th Century (XX. Század Intézet, est. 1999), the House of Terror Museum (Terror Háza Múzeum, est. 2002), the Institute for the Research on Communism (Kommunizmuskutató Intézet, est. 2011), the Research Institute and Archives for the History of Regime Change (Rendszerváltás Történetét Kutató Intézet és Archívum, RETÖRKI, est. 2013), the VERITAS Research Institute for History (VERITAS Történetkutató Intézet, est. 2013), the Committee of National Remembrance (Nemzeti Emlékezet Bizottsága, NEB, est. 2013), and the Institute of National Heritage (Nemzeti Örökség Intézete, NÖRI, est. 2013).
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2020, 2; 263-283
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The History and Politics of the Russian Federation: a War for Memory, or a War against Memory?
    Autorzy:
    Darczewska, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956254.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    politics of history
    politics of memory
    the Russian Historical Society
    Rosarkhiv
    information warfare
    culture wars
    historical-cultural standard
    Opis:
    The term ‘wars of memory’ refers to the Russian specificity of the issues described in the West as ‘politics of history’ or the ‘politics of memory’. The historical arguments which are employed in the Russian Federation in the context of information and cultural warfare, and are identified with the war over the interpretation of history, are being used to achieve the Kremlin’s political objectives in both its domestic and external arenas: any visions which conflict with the official one are discredited as anti-Russian and falsifications of the history of Russia. This text consists of three parts. The first discusses the evolution of the problem in Russian public discourse since the collapse of the USSR; the second describes the historical-cultural standard currently operative in Russia (its pattern of assessments and historical interpretations); and the third, outlines the manifestations of the state’s involvement in implementing its specifically understood politics of memory, with particular emphasis on the role of the Russian Historical Society and Rosarkhiv. The ‘wars’ discussed in this article have become one of the systemic mechanisms for Russia’s confrontation with both the external environment and its internal opposition. The memory and historical-cultural identity as disseminated now are leading to a secondary Sovietisation of society and the mobilisation of imperial and nationalist (ethnocentric, ethnically Russian) resentments within the Russian Federation.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 351-376
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    “Nothing is Universal when it Comes to Human Pain”. Interview with Dr. Piotr M. A. Cywiński, Director of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum
    Autorzy:
    Cywiński, Piotr
    Piekarska, Anna
    Dąbrowski, Franciszek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956346.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Auschwitz
    Holocaust
    politics of history
    museum
    place of memory
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2020, 2; 9-51
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Politics of Memory in Independent Georgia. Selected Aspects
    Autorzy:
    Górecki, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956293.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Georgia
    Abkhazia
    South Ossetia
    Gori
    Tbilisi
    Joseph Stalin
    USSR
    Russia
    Zviad Gamsakhurdia
    Eduard Shevardnadze
    Rose Revolution
    Mikheil Saakashvili
    politics of memory
    Transcaucasia
    Southern Caucasus
    Opis:
    This article outlines the question of politics of memory in independent Georgia (since the collapse of the USSR). The author argues that Georgia is not yet conducting such a policy, but we may nevertheless discuss a sum of activities which during the rules of Zviad Gamsakhurdia (1990–1992) and Eduard Shevardnadze (1992–2003) were sporadic and intuitive, but since the Rose Revolution and the government of Mikheil Saakashvili (2004–2013) have become more thoughtful and methodical (the Museum of Soviet Occupation was opened in Tbilisi during this time). The actions taken were influenced by the political situation – the civil war, the wars in South Ossetia and Abkhazia in the 1990s, and the Russian-Georgian war of 2008 – as well as the regional diversity of the country, its multi-ethnicity, and its position in the South Caucasus (which in Soviet times was known as Transcaucasia). This article discusses the most important topics that appear in Georgian narratives about the past, highlighting the historical ties between it and the West (the aim is to prove that in cultural-axiological terms Georgia belongs to Europe, and thus to justify Tbilisi’s aspirations to integration with the EU and NATO), and depicting Georgia as the victim of the Russian and Soviet empires (and whose successor is contemporary Russia). However, the Georgian message is hindered by the existence of the Joseph Stalin State Museum, which glorifies the Soviet dictator.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 283-309
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Politics of Remembrance of Russia, Germany and the Concerns of Central and Eastern Europe. Comments on the Margin of a Russian-German History Textbook of the 20th Century
    Autorzy:
    Banaszkiewicz, Mikołaj
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2116141.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Russia
    Germany
    Central and Eastern Europe
    politics of remembrance
    collective memory
    Opis:
    Review: Россия – Германия. Вехи совместной истории в коллективной памяти. Vol. 3: XX century. Moscow: Институт всеобщей истории РАН, ООО “Интеграция: Образование и наука”, 400 pp., ISBN 9785904914080. This review article discusses a textbook on twentieth-century history, prepared in collaboration between German and Russian historians. The analysis of the publication’s content is set in a broader context—the place of Germany in Russia’s politics of remembrance (legislation, historical education). Of particular interest are the chapters whose caesuras are marked by the Revolution of 1917 and the end of Stalinism. The constitutive elements of the authors’ historical reflection, that are beliefs imposing the interpretation of events (the primacy of geopolitics, superpower), are indicated. The polemical remarks concern both the conceptual and methodological shortcomings of the textbook and the controversial interpretative approaches. The latter primarily concerns the genesis of World War II and the evaluation of the Yalta order. The above historiographical vision is contrasted with the collective memory of the national communities of Central and Eastern Europe.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2021-2022, 4; 289-341
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Lithuanian Politics of History in 1990–2018. Legal Solutions
    Autorzy:
    Volkonovski, Jaroslav
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956258.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    Lithuanian politics of history
    historical memory
    public holidays
    days of remembrance
    nation’s historical memory
    Commission for the National Historical Memory
    Opis:
    The following article provides an insight into Lithuanian public holidays and days of remembrance in the period 1990–2018, established on the basis of national legislative acts, including legal acts and stenographic records drafted up during the sittings of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. Both the Seimas and the president of Lithuania have made subsequent decisions on drafting the list of public holidays and days of remembrance, enabling to determine the most important dates and events that have laid the groundwork for Lithuania’s historical memory. The list of public holidays displays a clear pro-state and religious tendency while that of days of remembrance seems to be marked by clear anti-Soviet sentiment, tilting towards promoting a pro-Western system of values. Before adopting the relevant legal acts, members of the Lithuanian parliament held a discussion, under which two additional holidays commemorating the Constitution of May 3, 1791 and the Mutual Pledge of the Two Nations of October 20, 1791 were officially put on the list. Also, attention should be drawn both to the relevance and consistency of the list of public holidays and days of remembrance as the document is subject to constant updates. Endeavours to adopt legislation to commemorate the nation’s historical memory appeared unsuccessful while, given the 100th anniversary of Lithuania’s independence on February 16, 2018, all related efforts were forwarded to the relevant institutions; in consequence, a parliamentary committee was eventually convened on June 20, 2017. Nonetheless, too little time has passed since then to properly evaluate the works performed by the aforementioned body and the validity of all its decisions taken so far.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 165-217
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Culture of Memory and Politics of History in Lithuania in 1989–2018
    Autorzy:
    Nikžentaitis, Alvydas
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1956291.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    culture of memory
    politics of history
    identity
    inter-state relations
    national minorities
    Opis:
    This article aims to analyse the transformation of the culture of memory in Lithuania and the most important directions of Lithuanian politics of history in the period from 1989 to 2018. While discussing these questions, special attention is paid to the role of political factors (internal and external) and interstate relations, as well as to changes in the relationship between Lithuania’s culture of memory, and the cultures of memory and identity of the national minorities in Lithuania. The paper emphasises the processes of transformation of the Lithuanian culture of remembrance which started around 2005, when it was most recently updated. The research material presented herein shows that Lithuania’s culture of memory is full of contradictions and conflicts, and that its central figure has changed.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2019, 1; 119-163
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests (2009–12)
    Autorzy:
    Darczewska, Jolanta
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2108331.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
    Tematy:
    The Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests
    politics of history
    politics of memory
    historical propaganda
    active measures in the field of history
    information warfare
    Dmitri Medvedev
    Sergey Naryshkin
    Opis:
    Abstract: The Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests (Комиссия при президенте Российской Федерации по противодействию попыткам фальсификации истории в ущерб интересам России), established in 2009, was intended to serve as Russia’s response to similar attempts at institutionalisation in the Central and Eastern Europe region (such as the historical commissions in the Baltic states, and the Institutes of National Remembrance in Poland and Ukraine). At the same time, its activities showed a multidimensional approach, combining elements of security policy with education, culture and media, public and non-public memory policy, and formal and informal activities. Although the official emphasis was mainly on the external (foreign) determinants of the Commission’s genesis, it also became an important element of domestic policy. The Commission only operated for three years (2009–2012), but its importance as a tool of Kremlin policy cannot be overestimated. It turned difficult historical issues into “historical weapons”; introduced international public discourse to the Russian narrative, which was constructed in a spirit of confrontation with the memories of its neighbours; coordinated the activities of formal state organisations, as well as those which operated as nominally non-state bodies but were financed by the state; expanded the community of expert research which argued the Russian narrative while undermining others from abroad; and examined the options for transmitting the desired attitudes and opinions to wider audiences, creating systemic mechanisms of what has been called “counteracting the falsification of history.” The aim of this article is to show the institutional and organisational aspect of this phenomenon.
    Źródło:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review; 2021-2022, 3; 127-176
    2658-1566
    Pojawia się w:
    Institute of National Remembrance Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies