Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Historical Methodology" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
HISTORIA NAJNOWSZA - POMIĘDZY PEWNOŚCIĄ A ZWĄTPIENIEM?
CONTEMPORARY HISTORY - BETWEEN CERTAINTY AND DOUBT?
Autorzy:
ŁASZKIEWICZ, Hubert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909928.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-04-23
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Sources analysis
professional ethics of historian
moral judgments in history
methodology of history
methodology of social sciences
historical synthesis
cumulative concept of historical science
metaphors in historical argumentation
Opis:
The paper discuss the regulatory principles which might be included into discussion on the controversy over the uses and misuses of contemporary history in Poland. The main proposals are as follow. We need greater methodological awareness that sources we are using whilst describing and interpreting the history are not refl ecting the whole past (which is simply impossible). While observing divergent versions of reconstructed past one should notice that the most divergent matt ers are connected with ethics. Three levels of ethics and moral judgments are listed: professional ethic of historian (is he a judge or observer), ethics/moral judgments of the past we investigate, moral judgment about the past. However tempting, metaphorical use of language should be limited at least at this stage of controversy, for there are not a commonly agreed set of metaphors, thus their use might only complicate the exchange of opinions.
Źródło:
Historia@Teoria; 2017, 4, 6; 87-96
2450-8047
Pojawia się w:
Historia@Teoria
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
POLITYZACJA/MITOLOGIZACJA HISTORII, CZYLI W CZYM NEURONAUKA (I METODOLOGIA) MOŻE POMÓC BADACZOWI HISTORII NAJNOWSZEJ?
THE POLITICIZATION/MYTHOLOGIZATION OF HISTORY OR HOW MIGHT NEUROSCIENCE (AND METHODOLOGY) SUPPORT THE RESEARCHER OF THE CONTEMPORARY HISTORY
Autorzy:
POMORSKI, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909935.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-04-23
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
homo historicus
homo metahistoricus
politicization of history
neuroscience
methodology
social responsibility social ca pital
historical thinking
Opis:
The narratives created by historians with respect to events of the past serve not only the cognitive aims, but may also be used in the current discourse of power and as such be referred to as ‘historical politics’. In such cases the spotlight is no longer on the historical truth, but rather on the ability to legitimize the power exercised by one social group or political party over the rest of the society. The reason why one reaches for historical myth and politicizes historical narrative is that the emotions evoked in the process can access the mind of a common creator of history (homo historicus) much easier compared to historians’ refi ned analysis based on credible sources and proper methodology. From the perspective of historical politics, a historian – being a rational entity aware of its past (homo metahistoricus) – becomes something redundant, an obstacle that has to be silenced, suppressed or removed. All that matt ers is homo historicus, as it is the ballot in his or hers hand that will eventually determine winners and losers on election day. As is known, history writt en by the victors diff ers substantially from the one writt en by the defeated. Having diagnosed this way the situation relating to every historian aware of social responsibility of the results of historical studies, the author underlines that historical narrative may be applied to building both positive and negative social capital. Th e myth and politicization of history act toward dividing a community, rather than uniting it. Th ere is no way to create an eff ectively operating community without referring to past experiences, although when describing those experiences, it is very easy to fall into various traps of historical thinking. For this reason, neuroscience and methodology are of such a great importance to the historian of the 20th Century History.
Źródło:
Historia@Teoria; 2017, 4, 6; 15-42
2450-8047
Pojawia się w:
Historia@Teoria
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies