Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "criminal evidence" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Przymusowe poszukiwanie, wydobycie i odebranie dowodów w procesie karnym a tajemnica dziennikarska
    The Forced Search and Retrieval of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings Versus Journalist Secrecy
    Autorzy:
    Koper, Radosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/518648.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
    Tematy:
    journalist secrecy
    search
    wiretapping
    control
    of correspondence
    criminal proceedings
    evidence
    Opis:
    The paper addresses fundamental issues that arise in connection with coercive measures that are applied in criminal proceedings, consisting of search and sei- zure of the evidence. The author takes into consideration the application of search, seizure, control of correspondence and wiretapping in the context of journalistic secrecy. The article verifies the standards of protection of journalistic secrecy, which should not be the subject of unjustified and excessive infringement. The author reviews provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Press Law Act in respect of this problem. The defects of normative regulations have been identified and certain improvements and amendments proposed. The general goal of the paper is to postulate a number of solutions that will result from proper decisions made when the concurrent interests and values clash.
    Źródło:
    Forum Prawnicze; 2018, 6 (50); 3-17
    2081-688X
    Pojawia się w:
    Forum Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Prywatna opinia biegłego na tle pozycji konsultanta technicznego strony we włoskim procesie karnym
    Private Expert Opinion on Background of Technical Consultant’s Position in the Italian Criminal Proceedings
    Autorzy:
    Smarzewski, Marek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/518575.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
    Tematy:
    evidence
    expert
    technical consultant
    expert opinion
    private expert opinion
    Opis:
    The paper considers issues referring to the institution of private expert opinion in criminal proceedings in the context of the possibility of its evidentiary use in it. The author paid attention to the objectively negligible value of the analyzed evidence, which is closely related with its kind of detachment from the source from which it comes, including limited possibilities to verify such evidence. Authors of private expert opinions do not formally participate in the proceedings. For these reasons, the article presents the institution of the technical consultant of the party functioning on the basis of the Italian criminal procedure, arguing that the introduction of such an entity to the category of participants of the Polish criminal process could be a remedy for problems and controversies related to the participation of experts supporting the parties. By this, parties and their representatives could have more realistic impact on the content of the findings in terms of circumstances, the settlement of which requires special knowledge.
    Źródło:
    Forum Prawnicze; 2020, 1 (57); 58-71
    2081-688X
    Pojawia się w:
    Forum Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Podstęp użyty wobec oskarżonego jako dowód prywatny – uwagi de lege ferenda w świetle nowelizacji kodeksu postępowania karnego
    Deceit in the Context of Private Evidence – de lege ferenda Remarks on an Amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure
    Autorzy:
    Toruński, Michał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/518602.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
    Opis:
    In this paper presented is the question of deceit in the context of private evidence in the light of an amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure. Firstly, the essence of the term ‘deceit’, focusing on its lexical meaning, is discussed, as well as its existence in other areas of law, including civil and criminal law or previous Codes of Criminal Procedure. An attempt to propose an authorial definition of the term is also made. Furthermore, the author considers the motives for introducing the said amendment to the Code, with the deliberations centered around article 393 par. 3 of the Code, which – de lege ferenda – would enable the parties to make use of their private evidence in the course of procedure. The article discusses that change proposed, which permits the counsel for the defendant to employ private evidence may potentially cause difficulties in the interpretation of the Act as a whole, something which was not foreseen by the legislator. One of such difficulties is the problem of deceitful obtainment of private evidence. Furthermore, it is not yet known how the gathering of the private evidence will look like. Potentially, there is a sizable number of persons who may avail of deceit with a view to obtaining evidence, as well as persons against whom deceit may be employed. Having this in mind, the author tries to delineate the general rules pertaining to the use of deceit when obtaining the private evidence. He points out that the rule „nemo se ipsum accusare tenetur” could be easily broken and also juxtaposes the deceit with the „fair trial rule”. The discussion contained herein also touches upon the proposed addition of article 168a to the Code. It is the author’s conclusion that the fact that the burden of proof is plaed on the parties may threat the trial’s comprehensiveness. The problem of deceit, despite the demands voiced by the doctrine, has not been settled hitherto, and it remains unresolved even under the new amendment.
    Źródło:
    Forum Prawnicze; 2015, 1 (27); 62-73
    2081-688X
    Pojawia się w:
    Forum Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies