Autor: Obolevitch, Teresa - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Nauka, filozofia i teologia w Rosji nowożytnej
Philosophy, Science and Theology in the Modern Russia
Autorzy:: Obolevitch, Teresa
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/968656.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2007-12-01
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:: Between the Orthodox Russian Church and modern science were not any serious conflicts. For examples, in XVII century students of Academy of Kiev-Mohyla studied heliocentric system of Copernic and doctrine of Galileo. In 1724 According to the project of Leibniz Tsar Peter I founded Russian Academy of Science in St-Petersburg. There worked D. Bernoulli and L. Euler. The Russian philosophical though presents an attempt of accord of science and theology.
Źródło:: Filozofia Nauki; 2007, 15, 4; 71-78
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:: Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Synteza neopatrystyczna a nauka
A Neo-Patristic Synthesis and Science
Autorzy:: Obolevitch, Teresa
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/967211.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012-12-01
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Opis:: The article presents Fr. Georgy Florovsky’s conception of a neo-patristic synthesis (developed by other orthodox theologians) and discusses some polemical aspects of this project. The neo-patristic synthesis is an approach to development of the patristic thought in the contemporary world and application it to the different branches of knowledge, including science. According to Florovsky science has an imperfect character, because to know the empirical world is possible only from the theological point of view. This position is shared by Alexei Nesteruk who claims that the patristic solutions can be treated as a model for the issues of relationship between science and religion. In this way a postulate of the methodological independency of science is breached. We show that this position is also is not accordance with the patristic thought because the Fathers of the Church were very open towards to the intellectual heritage of their time. Although they stressed that secular knowledge is inferior to theology, nevertheless this statement should be taken in the broad historical context of the defense of Christianity. Eastern Christian attitude to science is very sensitive for the transcendence and takes into account the anthropological dimension. In the conclusion we admit that these aspects of the patristic approach can be useful for the reflection about relationship between science and religion, under the condition that they will not break the principle of the methodological naturalism.
Źródło:: Filozofia Nauki; 2012, 20, 4; 87-103
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:: Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Obolevitch, Teresa" wg kryterium: Autor

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język