Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "sprawiedliwość naprawcza" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8
    Tytuł:
    Mediacja jako forma sprawiedliwości naprawczej – korzyści dla stron
    Mediation as a Form of Restorative Justice: Benefits of the Parties
    Autorzy:
    Waluk, Janina
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698602.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    mediacja
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    mediation
    restorative justice
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2008, XXIX-XXX; 871-883
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Learning to Change: Restorative Responses to Wrongdoing
    Autorzy:
    Wright, Martin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698594.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    czyn karalny
    przestępcy
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    wrongdoing
    offenders
    restorative justice
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2008, XXIX-XXX; 895-904
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The dawning of a new era in social reaction to crime: promise, potential and limitations of restorative justice
    Autorzy:
    Fattah, Ezzat A.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699029.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    polityka kryminalna
    zapobieganie przestępczości
    social reaction to crime
    criminology
    victim
    Opis:
    Despite dramatic social changes and unprecedented technological innovations penal philosophy has undergone little change. Retribution continues to be the key principle in sentencing and judges continue their hopeless struggle to make the punishment fit the crime. It is truly baffling that the CJS has remained archaic in its philosophy, its outlook and its tools and has remained insulated from whatever changes and advances that had taken place in modern society? For as yet unexplained reasons the system has resisted every attempt to modernize and change? This is probably why it is that despite the manifest advantages and benefits of R.J. over a punitive, retributive system, whose sole aim is to inflict pain and suffering on the wrong-doer, there is still reluctance to do away with the ideas of expiation and penitence in favor of reconciliation and compensation. The strong support for victims of crime, coupled with the undeniable fact that victims are the main losers in a punitive system of justice, have not yet succeeded in convincing politicians, lawmakers or the general public of the need to replace the medieval practice of punishment by a more constructive, more peaceful and less harmful means of dealing with crime and conflict. And yet, the destructive and detrimental effects of punishment are too evident to ignore. All this suggests that the time is right for a paradigm shift in society’s response to crime. There is a desperate need to move from philosophical abstraction to restorative action, from senseless retribution to meaningful restitution, from just deserts to restorative justice. But there is also a need for realism. R.J. is not a pana-cea. Although superior in every respect to retribution R.J. does have certain limitations and there are certain dangers to be avoided when moving towards the full implementation of a restorative justice system.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2012, XXXIV; 7-42
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Rewizja poglądów na temat konfliktu jako własności. Przeszkody we wprowadzaniu procedur sprawiedliwości naprawczej i sposoby ich pokonywania z punktu widzenia polskiej praktyki prawnej
    Conflict as Property Revisited. Obstacles to Introduce Restorative Justice Procedures and Ways to Overcome Them from the Experience of the Polish Juridical Practice
    Autorzy:
    Płatek, Monika
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699098.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    proces karny
    ofiary
    mediacja
    restorative justice
    criminal justice system
    victims
    mediation
    Opis:
    This paper concerns the road Poland is on to introduce restorative justice procedures within its criminal justice system. The author describes the difficulties Poland has already overcome and is still facing. In addition, the paper shows the possible dangers we are not willing to see yet. The restorative justice procedures are introduced in the name of victims. They are aimed at observing the victims' rights and interests within the criminal justice system. Restorative justice is also to bring back the conflicts to their owners. The new developments are aimed at achieving this goal. The author discusses the invisible aspects which, if not diagnosed, named and prevented in time, can steal again the conflict from those most involved in it. It was once stolen by lawyers, judges and prosecutors who officially acted for the victims' good and support. Today, an identical process is possible with mediator taking the lawyers place.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2006, XXVIII; 267-279
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Przestępczość i reformy wymiaru sprawiedliwości w „nowych państwach środkowoeuropejskich” na przykładzie Czech
    Criminality and Criminal Justice Reforms in the ‘New Central European Countries’ on the Example of the Czech Republic
    Autorzy:
    Válková, Helena
    Hulmáková, Jana
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699126.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    przestępczość
    wymiar sprawiedliwości
    reforma
    Czechy
    polityka karna
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    criminality
    criminal justice
    reforms
    restoriative justice
    Opis:
    The victimological research and their results revealed myths about the alleged need of the crime victims to seek revenge on the offenders for the injustice suffered. On the contrary, they showed that a vast majority of victims is concerned more about obtaining quickly, ideally informally, moral and also material satisfaction. Therefore, in the last two decades of the 20th century, the efforts made by experts from the criminal policy area, practice and academic work sites grow stronger in order to find alternative ways / paradigm to traditional criminal reaction to a crime. This effort was channelled into a movement now known as the restorative justice that brought a visible success for the crime victims both at the level of adopting new legislative measures and providing practical assistance while solving and eliminating the consequences caused by a specific criminal act. Concurrently, it opened space for further research focussed on identification of a real contribution of the restorative procedures and programmes for the crime victims, including the risks of their potential 'abuse' for these purposes. Despite a number of more or less important reforms, the Czech Republic has failed as opposed to other post-communist countries (including Slovakia) to adopt a new criminal law until the present time. Therefore, the criminal law from 1961 was amended more than 50 times between 1989 until yet. Currently, a draft of the new criminal law is being discussed in the Parliament, however, everything points to the fact there is not a enough of political will for its adoption. Nevertheless, it would be interesting to mention some of the most important changes that the new law would bring from the criminal point of view. The new Code abandons the existing material and formal concept of the criminal act (degree of danger for society) and replaces it by a formal concept. Besides this substantial conceptual intervention, a series of other important changes are taking place in the area of the criminal liability, for example: a new categorising of criminal acts, new legal concepts of error in facts and error in law, introducing a new institute of gross negligence, a new definition of indirect offender, extremely dangerous recidivist, precision of definitions covering circumstances eliminating illegality of a act (extreme necessity, necessary self-defence, admissible risk, etc).
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2006, XXVIII; 111-128
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Czym jest miasto sprawiedliwości naprawczej?
    What is a restorative city?
    Autorzy:
    Matczak, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2030556.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    miasto sprawiedliwości naprawczej
    mediacja
    konflikt
    urbanistyka
    restorative justice
    restorative city
    mediation
    conflict
    urban planning
    Opis:
    Koncepcja miasta sprawiedliwości naprawczej jest jednym z najnowszych osiągnięć rozwoju praktyki oraz teorii sprawiedliwości naprawczej w ciągu ostatnich lat. Pomimo braku jednolitych standardów wdrażania tej idei, koncepcję miasta sprawiedliwości naprawczej można zdefiniować jako proces kształtowania życia społecznego oraz przestrzeni miejskiej przez pryzmat filozofii, zasad i wartości sprawiedliwości naprawczej. Celem niniejszego opracowania jest omówienie wniosków z analizy procesu wdrażania koncepcji miasta sprawiedliwości naprawczej w oparciu o doświadczenia następujących miast: Hull (Wielka Brytania), Bristol (Wielka Brytania), Brighton i Hove (Wielka Brytania), Leuven (Belgia), Como (Włochy), Tempio Pausania (Włochy), Whanganui (Nowa Zelandia) oraz Oakland (Stany Zjednoczone). Opracowanie kończy krótkie podsumowanie dotychczasowych działań na rzecz rozwoju idei miast sprawiedliwości naprawczej we Wrocławiu.
    The concept of a restorative city is one of the most recent successful developments in the field of restorative justice theory and practice. Despite the lack of universal standards of implementation, a restorative city can be defined as a process that aims to shape both community life as well as urban space through the lens of restorative justice philosophy, values, and standards. The purpose of this article is to discuss the results of the analysis of how this concept has been implemented in the following cities: Hull (United Kingdom), Bristol (United Kingdom), Brighton & Hove (United Kingdom), Leuven (Belgium), Como (Italy), Tempio Pausania (Italy), Whanganui (New Zealand) and Oakland (United States). The article concludes with a brief summary of activities that have been undertaken in Wrocław in order to gain the status of a restorative city.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2021, XLIII/2; 399-427
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Mediacja między pokrzywdzonym a sprawcą przestępstwa jako forma rozwiązywania konfliktów
    Mediation between the Aggrieved Party and the Perpetrator as a Form of Conflict-Solving
    Autorzy:
    Kruk, Marzena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/698792.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2008
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    konflikty
    mediacja
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    sposoby rozwiązywania konfliktów
    pokrzywdzony
    sprawca przestępstwa
    conflicts
    mediation
    restorative justice
    ways to solve conflicts
    aggrieved party
    perpetrator
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2008, XXIX-XXX; 837-851
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Victim-offender Mediation in Poland – The Lay Perspective
    Autorzy:
    Matczak, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/962408.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    sprawiedliwość naprawcza
    mediacja
    ofiara
    sprawca
    opinia świecka
    system wymiaru sprawiedliwości w sprawach karnych
    przeprosiny
    restorative justice
    victim-offender mediation
    lay opinion
    criminal justice system
    apology
    Opis:
    Restorative justice is a complex and multi-faceted concept, the introduction of whichdoes not happen in a socio-political and economic vacuum. Every society engageswith restorative justice in its own distinctive way as it is the society – lay people – thatis always on the receiving end of restorative solutions. In this article, I draw on mydoctoral research that explores qualitatively how a small number of Polish peopleunderstand punishment and justice, and how their narratives inform the viabilityof restorative approaches to justice in Poland. In other words, I propose to considera macro-sociological perspective, and how lay people’s understanding of punishmentand justice should be seen as an avenue by which to explore certain preconditions forthe viability of restorative justice.Poland’s socialist past, change of the political regime, post-communist “accession”to the international community in the West and a high level of religiosity (among manyother factors) make Poland a fascinating object of study that can, at the same time,offer insights about restorative justice in other societies. Restorative justice, introducedin the form of victim-offender mediation, was part of the post-1989 political ambitionsto change the Polish penal landscape and join the international community in the West.There were a number of forces behind the establishment of restorative justice in Poland.Given that the concept was introduced at a time when the Polish society was dealingwith the socialist legacy and creating a new democratic reality, it was also hoped thatmediation could serve as a fast-track remedy and act as an ancillary mechanism toreduce the sudden spike in court workloads after the fall of communism. In the caseof Poland, it seems that the exceptionally limited interest in mediation and the paucityof anticipated outcomes of victim-offender mediation is the problem. In order toexplore the viability of restorative justice in the Polish context, one must thereforelook beyond the legal basis and formal logistics which have been already in place formany years.My research opens up new debates on the viability of restorative justice, and thisarticle in particular fleshes out the nature of the participants’ perceptions of victimoffendermediation. In this article, I first briefly introduce the Polish model of victimoffendermediation. I then discuss the nature of the initial responses to mediationbased on the participants’ knowledge of, support for, and any experience of, victimoffendermediation. This is followed by the discussion on how the participants’ viewson mediation were articulated in the shadow of the Polish criminal justice system.Next, I explore why the participants viewed mediation as a business-like encounterand, finally, I explore the participants’ perceptions of apology – something that cameup as one of the most interesting findings of the study.The aim of this paper is to argue that the viability of restorative justice should beapproached as a process that is influenced by broader socio-economic, political andeven linguistic factors. Although the Polish model of victim-offender mediation wasinspired by the restorative justice concept, the narratives of my lay participants suggesta number of socio-cultural obstacles to the further development of restorative justicein Poland. Despite a limited knowledge of victim-offender mediation among the studyparticipants, it is clear that support for mediation is negotiated and conditional.Although victim-offender mediation was mainly perceived not as a punishment, therole and purpose of this practice was discussed against the background of the Polishcriminal justice system. Although the relationship might be defined as “uneasy” (seeShapland et al. 2006), restorative justice, since its conception, has been interwoven withthe two. One of restorative justice’s central hopes was to establish an alternative systemof crime resolution that would eliminate the infliction of pain. However, the trajectoryof restorative justice solutions in many countries demonstrates that the functioningof a majority of them is dependent on criminal justice agencies. Given the close andinseparable relationship between the two, I argue in my research that the ways in whichlay people perceive the criminal justice institutions affect their perceptions of alternativeconflict resolutions. Then, as it emerged in my fieldwork, the study participants’ perceptionof harm suggests that mediation might be seen as an avenue to focus onthe financial side of the reparation, and as result might achieve something other thanrestorative goals. The narratives of my study participants also explore the difficultyof acknowledging apology as a genuine element of the restorative encounter. Thiscould be due to looking at apology through the lens of court apology, sociolinguistic or cultural reasons. John Braithwaite in his book Restorative Justice and ResponsiveRegulation (2002) rightly indicated that “we are still learning how to do restorativejustice well” (p. 565). Nevertheless, the question whether a perfect restorative justiceprogramme is ever possible remains open.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 2018, XL; 495-522
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-8 z 8

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies