Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "mass spring model" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Movement variability response to change in the rate of hopping
Autorzy:
Fietzer, Abbigail L.
Koyama, Yumiko
Kulig, Kornelia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/307386.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Politechnika Wrocławska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
Tematy:
kolektor
model
koordynacja segmentowa
uncontrolled manifold
spring mass model
segmental coordination
Opis:
Movement variability is often considered undesirable, but growing evidence demonstrates positive aspects of variability. During unipedal hopping, control of limb stiffness and limb length are paramount. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of measuring movement variability that provide information at the task level, and their capacities to illuminate the neuromotor control system’s response to change in hopping rate. Methods: The typical task-level movement variability measure of the standard deviation of vertical limb length was compared to uncontrolled manifold analysis. We examined the relationship between change scores in deviation from spring-mass model-type behavior and these two variability measures for the shift from typical (2.3 Hz) to slow (1.7 Hz) hopping. Results: The change scores for deviation from spring-mass model-type behavior and vertical limb length standard deviation demonstrated no correlation ( p = 0.784, R = 0.051). In contrast, the change scores for deviation from spring-mass model-type behavior and the uncontrolled manifold analysis measure demonstrated a moderate correlation ( p = 0.004, R = 0.502). Conclusions: Uncontrolled manifold analysis considers not just variability in the sense of error, but illustrates how the neuromotor control system distributes movement variability into performance-irrelevant and performance-destabilizing subspaces. As such, this type of analysis may be more effective at illuminating global control aspects of movement variability than the typical variability measure of limb length standard deviation.
Źródło:
Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics; 2019, 21, 4; 37-45
1509-409X
2450-6303
Pojawia się w:
Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Leg stiffness adjustment during hopping at different intensities and frequencies
Autorzy:
Mrdakovic, V.
Ilic, D.
Vulovic, R.
Matic, M.
Jankovic, N.
Filipovic, N.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/307107.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Politechnika Wrocławska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
Tematy:
połączenie
węzeł podatny
sztywność
skoki
joint stiffness
jumping performance
preferred hopping frequency
spring-mass model
Opis:
Understanding leg and joint stiffness adjustment during maximum hopping may provide important information for developing more effective training methods. It has been reported that ankle stiffness has major influence on stable spring-mass dynamics during submaximal hopping, and that knee stiffness is a major determinant for hopping performance during maximal hopping task. Furthermore, there are no reports on how the height of the previous hop could affect overall stiffness modulation of the subsequent maximum one. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether and how the jump height of the previous hop affects leg and joint stiffness for subsequent maximum hop. Ten participants completed trials in which they repeatedly hopped as high as possible (MX task) and trials in which they were instructed to perform several maximum hops with 3 preferred (optimal) height hops between each of them (P3MX task). Both hopping tasks were performed at 2.2 Hz hopping frequency and at the participant's preferred (freely chosen) frequency as well. By comparing results of those hopping tasks, we found that ankle stiffness at 2.2 Hz (p=0.041) and knee stiffness at preferred frequency (p=0.045) was significantly greater for MX versus P3MX tasks. Leg stiffness for 2.2 Hz hopping is greater than for the preferred frequency. Ankle stiffness is greater for 2.2 Hz than for preferred frequencies; opposite stands for knee stiffness. The results of this study suggest that preparatory hop height can be considered as an important factor for modulation of maximum hop.
Źródło:
Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics; 2014, 16, 3; 69-76
1509-409X
2450-6303
Pojawia się w:
Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies