- Tytuł:
- Dlaczego Popper nie był kryptoindukcjonistą
- Autorzy:
- Sajdek, Zofia
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/429115.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2012
- Wydawca:
- Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
- Tematy:
-
Karl Popper
David Hume
Rudolf Carnap
John Watkins
induction
verisimilitude
truthlikeness
probability
corroboration
confirmation
scepticism - Opis:
- The article is an attempt to answer the question whether the result of the connection between corroboration and verisimilitude is an inductive element in the Popperian methodology. For this purpose the essay collates Karl Popper’s view with David Hume’s scepticism and inductionism of Rudolf Carnap. Further on the paper analizes the compromising”(for inductionism and critical falsificationism) proposition of Evaldas Nekraˇsas. The article also contains a presentation of Imre Lakatos’ allegation of Popper’s scepticism and the accusation of inductionism as formulated by John Watkins. The study of the disputes between the philosophers leads to the conclusion that the critical views are baseless. The final hypothesis is that these are not the right ways of proving the allegations of crypto-inductionism.
- Źródło:
-
Semina Scientiarum; 2012, 11
1644-3365 - Pojawia się w:
- Semina Scientiarum
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł