Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "evolutionary epistemology" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
Filozofia Tadeusza Garbowskiego
Philosophy of Tadeusz Garbowski
Autorzy:
Lipski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690598.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Copernicus Center Press
Tematy:
evolutionary epistemology
Tadeusz Garbowski
philosophy of nature
Polish philosophy
Opis:
The period between the two World Wars was very fruitful for Polish philosophy. The best known intellectual formation of that time was the Lvov–Warsaw School of Logic. At the time, when members of that school philosophized in the context of logic and mathematics, there was a group of thinkers in Cracow, who attempted at creating a philosophy of nature. Unfortunately, because of the outbreak of the Second World War, they have never produced any philosophical school. One of the first of Cracow philosophers of nature was the biologist, Tadeusz Garbowski. He died in 1939 in Sachsenhausen concentration camp, leaving several philosophical papers which focus mostly on the theory of evolution. In the present paper, the author critically reviews his analyses. A lot of his ideas, e.g., the one called by the author the 'evolutionary epistemology', can be found in works of later thinkers, for instance in the works of Konrad Lorenz. Although it is doubtful that they actually knew Garbowski's papers, it still seems to be worthwhile to notice this historical fact.
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2008, 42; 112-136
0867-8286
2451-0602
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Od biologii zachowania się zwierząt do biologii ludzkiego poznania
From the Biology of Animal Behavior to the Biology of Human Cognition
Autorzy:
Łepko, Zbigniew
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/496483.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-05-31
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe Franciszka Salezego
Tematy:
biologia zachowania się
ewolucyjna teoria poznania
Konrad Lorenz
Immanuel Kant
behavior biology
evolutionary epistemology
Opis:
The article discusses the effects of Konrad Lorenz’s work at the University of Königsberg. They constitute a response of biology to Immanuel Kant’s question regarding the possibility of making synthetic a priori judgments, which he presented in monographs “Kant’s Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie” and „Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung”. The two Lorenz’s publications present the main thesis of evolutionary epistemology which can be understood both as phylogenesis of human cognitive abilities and as a theory of epistemological process of approaching the truth of the reality. Evolutionary epistemology’s significance is lies in an attempt to show the way of overcoming the opposition between rationalism and empiricism and between realism and idealism. The attempt raises a controversy and questions concerning the methodological status such epistemology which bridges biology and philosophy.
Źródło:
Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe; 2015, 36, 2; 81-92
1232-8766
Pojawia się w:
Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pseudodarwinizm selekcjonistycznych modeli rozwoju nauki
The Pseudo-Darwinism of Selectionist Models of the Development of Science
Autorzy:
Wagner, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/38429353.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Tematy:
Darwinism
David Hull
Stephen Toulmin
epistemic evolution
population thinking
evolution of science
evolutionary epistemology of theories
Opis:
The paper analyzes the incompatibility of Evolutionary Epistemology of Theories (EET) with Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. The argument consists of four parts, each addressing a specific problem with EET and offering examples. Firstly, advocates of EET frequently misapply Darwin’s theory by asserting that evolution is teleological, which is at odds with Darwinism. Secondly, the “universal Darwinism” underlying EET is inconsistent with the relativism present in Darwin’s theory. Thirdly, because of the relativistic character of Darwin’s theory, philosophies that appeal to it need to provide additional justification for using Darwin’s ideas outside of biology, which EET fails to do. Finally, the paper demonstrates that the Darwinocentric historiography proposed by EET underappreciates neo-Lamarckism, whose model of evolution is closer to that used in EET.
Źródło:
Filozofia Nauki; 2022, 30, 3; 5-32
1230-6894
2657-5868
Pojawia się w:
Filozofia Nauki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ewolucyjna teoria poznania a kognitywistyka
Evolutionary Epistemology and Cognitive Sciences
Autorzy:
Pleszczyński, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013416.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
teoria poznania
epistemologia ewolucyjna
ewolucyjna teoria poznania
kognitywistyka
reprezentacje
obrazy świata
epistemology
evolutionary epistemology
Cognitive Sciences
representations
picture of the world
view of the world
Opis:
In this article I am dealing mainly with the following notions: “perception apparatus” (Weltbildapparat), “view of the world” (Weltbild, picture of the world) and “representation”. The first and the second ones belong to the basic notions in the vocabulary of K. Lorenz’s evolutionary epistemology, the third in cognitive sciences. I seek to demonstrate the relationships between them. This analysis is put in a broader context, indicating the relationships between expensively developing cognitive sciences and evolutionary epistemology (much less popular today). It is quite easy to determine what the perception apparatus is, however, it is harder to state what the view of the world, especially in its ontological aspect, is. Nevertheless, the view of the representation in the context of evolutionary epistemology points to the fact that this notion is still unclear and many representational features can be assigned to objects which, as it seems, are not representations according to cognitive sciences.
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2006, 54, 2; 175-197
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Filozofia przyrody jako podstawa światoobrazu
Autorzy:
Pleszczyński, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2013470.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
światoobraz
obraz świata
ewolucyjna teoria poznania
filozofia nauki
filozofia przyrody
Weltbild
picture of the world
evolutionary epistemology
philosophy of sciences
philosophia naturalis
Źródło:
Roczniki Filozoficzne; 2006, 54, 1; 306-309
0035-7685
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Disputatio on the Distinction between the Human Person and Other Animals: the Human Person as Gardener
Autorzy:
Savino, Damien Marie
Wagner, Daniel C.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138115.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-26
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
human uniqueness
gardening
person
personalism
philosophical anthropology
philosophical biology
thomas Aquinas
Aristotle
human intelligence
animal intelligence
cognition
epistemology
metaphysics
philosophy of language
evolutionary biology
ecology
logic
ethics
disputatio
Opis:
While the catholic intellectual tradition upholds the uniqueness of humans, much contemporary scientific research has come to the opposing conclusion that humans are not significantly different from other animals. to engage in robust dialogue around the question of human uniqueness, we utilize Aquinas’s model of disputatio to focus on an attribute of human beings that is unexplored in the literature – namely, the human capacity to garden – and address five scientific and philosophical objections to our position that the capacity to garden makes humans distinct. engaging with various branches of science, we demonstrate that human capacities and modes of gardening are not only incrementally different, but also fundamentally different in kind, from those of nonhuman creatures. Philosophically, we utilize the power-object model of division and Aristotle’s categorization of knowledge to express the difference in kind between human beings and other animals. these responses allow us to set aside each major objection.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2022, 11, 3; 471-530
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies