Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "deliberation" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 37
Tytuł:
Political discourse as practical reasoning: A case study of a British Prime Minister candidate speech
Autorzy:
Harmon, Lucyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1040226.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12-30
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
discourse
politics
deliberation
argumentation
Fairclough
Opis:
The paper outlines the method of political discourse analysis proposed by I. Fairclough & N. Fairclough (2012), who point to argumentative and deliberative nature of political discourse as practical reasoning that aims to decide a problem-solving action in a given situation. The novelty of this approach is explained through references to its established alternatives as focused on representation and power relations. The above mentioned method is applied to the British PM campaign candidacy speech by Andrea Leadsom to test how it works in the case of this type of political discourse which is different from the one originally examined. On this occasion, the meaning of the term ‘discourse’ is illustrated through the practical necessity of involving in the analyses the extra-linguistic and intertextual context.
Źródło:
Linguistics Beyond and Within; 2017, 3; 74-86
2450-5188
Pojawia się w:
Linguistics Beyond and Within
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A Reply to John Dudley on Aristotle, Physics 2.5, 196b17–21
A Reply to John Dudley on Aristotle, Physics 2.5, 196b17
Autorzy:
Giardina, Giovanna R.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633578.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Aristotle
physics
teleology
end
deliberation
Opis:
In this article, I restate the interpretation of Aristotle’s Ph. 2.5, 196b17–21, which I presented for the first time in my book I fondamenti della causalità naturale (2006). According to my reading, both the things that are due to deliberation and those that are not (Arist. Ph. 196b17–18) fall within the group of beings which come to be not for the sake of anything (Arist. Ph. 196b17). In his recent book, Aristotle’s Concept of Chance (Albany 2012), John Dudley found my interpretation laudable and original but rejected it, opting for the traditional interpretation. As he did not provide sufficient reasons for this, I deem it appropriate to discuss more broadly and in greater detail my interpretation in order to demonstrate that it is correct theoretically, linguistically and grammatically. I also discuss a reading of Neoplatonic commentators which seems to me very useful: when commenting on Aristotle, they start with a very prejudicial interpretation which comes from Alexander and which probably determined all later interpretations of the passage. According to this interpretation, beings which come to be not for the sake of anything (Arist. Ph. 196b17) are beings that have no teleology of any kind. Yet this exegetic position faces a series of difficulties which can easily be solved if one assumes, as I do, that these beings have a certain end albeit not an intrinsic one.
In this article, I restate the interpretation of Aristotle’s Ph. 2.5, 196b17– 21, which I presented for the first time in my book I fondamenti della causalità naturale (2006). According to my reading, both the things that are due to deliberation and those that are not (Arist. Ph. 196b17–18) fall within the group of beings which come to be not for the sake of anything (Arist. Ph. 196b17). In his recent book, Aristotle’s Concept of Chance (Albany 2012), John Dudley found my interpretation laudable and original but rejected it, opting for the traditional interpretation. As he did not provide sufficient reasons for this, I deem it appropriate to discuss more broadly and in greater detail my interpretation in order to demonstrate that it is correct theoretically, linguistically and grammatically. I also discuss a reading of Neoplatonic commentators which seems to me very useful: when commenting on Aristotle, they start with a very prejudicial interpretation which comes from Alexander and which probably determined all later interpretations of the passage. According to this interpretation, beings which come to be not for the sake of anything (Arist. Ph. 196b17) are beings that have no teleology of any kind. Yet this exegetic position faces a series of difficulties which can easily be solved if one assumes, as I do, that these beings have a certain end albeit not an intrinsic one.
Źródło:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2017, 8, 1; 271-288
2082-7539
Pojawia się w:
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Deliberation and Automaticity in Habitual Acts
Autorzy:
Douskos, Christos
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/781205.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
habit
deliberation
automaticity
action explanation
Opis:
Most philosophers and psychologists assume that habitual acts do not ensue from deliberation, but are direct responses to the circumstances: habit essentially involves a variety of automaticity. My objective in this paper is to show that this view is unduly restrictive. A habit can explain an act in various ways. Pointing to the operation of automaticity is only one of them. I draw attention to the fact that acquired automaticity is one outgrowth of habituation that is relevant to explanation, but not the only one. Habituation shapes our emotional and motivational make up in ways that affect deliberation itself. Hence mentioning a habit might be indispensable in explaining an act which nevertheless ensues from deliberation. The view that habitual acts are direct responses to the circumstances implies an impoverished conception of habit, which fails to do justice to its rich explanatory potential in theoretical and pre-theoretical contexts, as well as to its role in the history of philosophy.
Źródło:
Ethics in Progress; 2018, 9, 1; 25-43
2084-9257
Pojawia się w:
Ethics in Progress
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Deliberative Democracy: The Case of Slovenia
Autorzy:
Haček, Miro
Kukovič, Simona
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1375471.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-26
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Śląski. Wydział Nauk Społecznych
Tematy:
deliberation
democracy
contitution
Slovenia
policy-making
Opis:
In Europe and across the world, many countries are turning to deliberative democracy to reform their constitutions, and in many others this question is high on the political agenda. Such transformation also shuffles quite radically the role of the citizenry regarding constitutional changes. Traditionally such changes are the sole responsibility of elected officials in collaboration with experts. With the deliberative turn, many more actors may be involved in the designing of constitutions, from citizens both individually and collectively in the forms of informal associations to various civil society organisations. The main aim of this paper is to analyse potential of deliberative democracy in Slovenian national setting, therefore authors are analysing a) framework of constitution making dynamics and b) most successful deliberative democratic tools and opportunities developed so far on both national and sub-national levels of the Slovenian government. As deliberative democracy is well known political phenomenon, we will start not by yet another theoretical pandemonium, but with less-known Slovenian contribution to the global development of deliberative model.
Źródło:
Political Preferences; 2020, 27; 5-24
2449-9064
Pojawia się w:
Political Preferences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
University, and what holds between people
Autorzy:
Sławek, Tadeusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/703356.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
university
society
education
citizenship
professor
deliberation
Opis:
Taking up Jacques Derrida's concept of „the university without condition”, we try to argue that the fundamental role of the university in the history of Europe has consisted in a specific kind of radicalism which, on the one hand, allows the individual for the exploration and pursuit of his/her interests and vocation, and, on the other, makes it mandatory to realize that the development of the individual always takes place in the space of conjoint communicative experience. Thus, what is at stake in any discussion of the university education is a future of democracy and citizenship. Using the works of, among others, Hanah Arendt, Immanuel Kant, Plato, Dewey, and Friedrich Hölderlin the essay makes a point that to save what holds between people, i.e. to redeem the human bond in the society, the university always aims at the acts of Deweyan deliberation thus discussing and thus determining appropriate significance to the public and the individual.
Źródło:
Nauka; 2009, 2
1231-8515
Pojawia się w:
Nauka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konsultacje społeczne jako forma współuczestnictwa obywateli w działaniach administracji publicznej
Public consultation as a form of citizens’ participation in activities of public administration
Autorzy:
Świtał, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/697167.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Opolski
Tematy:
consultations
deliberation
direct democracy
citizens
participation
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to present institutions of public consultation as one of the forms citizens’ participation of in public administration. The author defines the concept of public consultation in the field of legal sciences, identifies the legal basis for the process of public consultation, describes the principles, stages and process of conducting public consultations in Poland. In the paper the dogmatic-legal method and the method of legal functionalism are used.
Źródło:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne; 2018, 16, 1 (4); 97-106
2658-1922
Pojawia się w:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Co-Creation and Enhanced Youth Participation in Local Decision-Making: The Perception of Public Sector Readiness
Autorzy:
Narbutaite Aflaki, Inga
Hallik, Maarja
Nordberg, Kenneth
Kangro, Kadri
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21379494.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
co-creation readiness
youth participation
dialogues
deliberation
Opis:
The reverted demographic pyramid makes youth a decreasing percentage of our increasingly ageing population, leaving youth groups with less power and chances to influence the future of public policies and services through established participation channels. There is a potential risk of losing the interests of broader, including less heard, youth groups in democratic decision-making and implementation. Research evidence shows that we need to broaden knowledge and accountability towards these groups by including them more in co-creation to secure their trust and meaningful policy impact. One major way to improve trust in the public sector is by enhancing the abilities of professionals, managers, politicians and NGOs to co-create public and individual values with youth groups for better services and solutions instead of acting and making decisions on their behalf. Also, cross-sector collaboration among institutional units or stakeholders from different sectors on a local scale is often required to enhance the value of services or local community decisions. This paper explores from a comparative perspective the readiness of the local governments for enhanced democratic participation and co-creation of public services and public value with youth. Based on document studies, interviews and cross-sectoral learning dialogues between engaged researchers, public sector and NGO representatives conducted in three countries – Sweden, Finland, and Estonia – the paper illustrates the current perceptions of public professionals and managers regarding their approach to co-creation with youth and the public.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2023, Specjalny; 55-68
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
POLARYZACJA GRUPOWA W WARUNKACH DEBATY DELIBERATYWNEJ
Group polarization in deliberative debates
Autorzy:
WESOŁOWSKA, ELŻBIETA
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/546574.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Tematy:
group polarization
deliberative debates
citizen deliberation
group discussion
Opis:
In social psychology the group polarization refers to the tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of its members. This phenomenon constitutes a potential obstacle to positive outcomes attributed to deliberative debates. A deliberative debate is a particular kind of a group discussion tasked with fi nding group consensus on controversial issues. The idea of deliberation originates from the writings of John Rawls, Jürgen Habermas, Amy Gutmann and Denis Thompson. Deliberative debate imposes numerous normative requirements on the communication, relationships among the disputants and their approach to the issue under discussion. These normative requirements make a big difference between deliberative debates and the situations in which the phenomenon of polarization was observed. Thus, we presume that in deliberative debates conditions the phenomenon of group polarization may be limited. The paper investigates the following questions: would the normative conditions of deliberation limit the occurrence of polarization in discussing groups? and What infl uence (if any) would the polarization process have on the quality of group decision? In the light of the empirical data we concluded what follows: (1) In 50% of the analyzed cases of group discussion the phenomenon of group polarization was observed despite the normative conditions of deliberation. (2) The occurrence of group polarization in some cases coincided with making the fi nal decisions which did not alter the initial preferences of the disputants (but did not totally predestinated the fi nal outcome).
Źródło:
Civitas et Lex; 2014, 2; 19-30
2392-0300
Pojawia się w:
Civitas et Lex
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Advice as persuasion: a rhetorical framework
Autorzy:
Załęska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/703014.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
rhetoric
deliberative genre
advice
counselling
deliberation
counsellogy
Aristotle
Opis:
Since modern usage of the core terms is essential in the appropriate interpretation of ancient rhetoric texts, the paper starts from a discussion of semantic differences between the concepts of advice, counselling and deliberation in the Polish language. Ancient rhetoric takes as its starting point an overarching notion of ‘deliberative genre’ which includes not only laymen and expert advice, but also the political deliberation. It offers some theoretical categories, universal enough to address these apparently incompatible contexts of advice-giving and advice-taking. Rhetorical approach points out the relation between axiology and persuasive mechanisms. It identifies also some persuasive devices likely to enhance the efficiency of advice-giving, such as the use of examples and reasoning based on probability evaluation.
Źródło:
Nauka; 2017, 1
1231-8515
Pojawia się w:
Nauka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prudent Reflective Equilibrium
Autorzy:
Coitinho Silveira, Denis
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29433362.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Reflective equilibrium
prudence
moral deliberation
moral knowledge
John Rawls
Opis:
The main aim of this paper is to propose the inclusion of the expertise of a prudent agent within the procedure of reflective equilibrium by adding a disposition for identifying reasonable beliefs. This can be seen as the starting point of the method, and would safeguard against the criticism of conservatism and subjectivism. In order to do this, I will begin by analyzing the core characteristics of the method and its main weaknesses. I will then investigate the characteristics of prudence as a disposition for identifying an adequate means for achieving a good end. With this in mind, I will apply prudence to the procedure which is carried out by an agent who deliberates well and can identify reasonable moral beliefs. These beliefs must be justified according to their consistency with ethical principles and with the factual beliefs of relevant scientific theories. Finally, I will argue that this deliberative process is consistent with ethical pluralism and democracy, and can be interpreted as a kind of moral knowledge.
Źródło:
Ethics in Progress; 2023, 14, 1; 46-63
2084-9257
Pojawia się w:
Ethics in Progress
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Conceptualizing mediatization: Is `Have your say´ a kind of transnational public sphere for public deliberation?
Autorzy:
Castro Baía Reis, António Alberto
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/691374.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
Mediatization
Public Deliberation
Transnational Public Sphere
Online Discussion Forums
Opis:
The present essay aims to reflect on the questions of how the BBC news website discussion forum Have your say is organized and to what extent it can be considered as a transnational or global public sphere for public deliberation. In order to do so, one must firstly look at this discussion forum in terms of its structure, so that we can comprehend in a descriptive and formal way what is Have your say. Then, to try to understand and suggest what exactly Have your say is in terms of the possibility of being a global public sphere for public deliberation, one must tackle into a reflection that encompasses the concepts of transnational/global public sphere (Habermas, 1996; Castells, 2008), public deliberation (Pateman, 1970; Drvzek, 2000; Abelson et al., 2003), as well as some mediation/mediatization paradigms. The goal of this essay is to provide an objective academic reflection by attempting to frame this specific online phenomenon within the concepts above mentioned, to ultimately argue and prove that online discussion forums such as Have your say are by definition ambivalent. 
Źródło:
Mediatization Studies; 2017, 1
2451-1188
Pojawia się w:
Mediatization Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Forum Debaty Publicznej
Forum for Public Debate
Autorzy:
Kozioł, Ryszard
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/489640.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
Tematy:
Forum for Public Debate
deliberation
deliberative democracy
public participation
Opis:
A crisis of contemporary democracy, long proclaimed by political analysts, and the growing discontent with its practice have given a stimulus for various remedial actions. One of these actions is the idea of deliberative democracy. Deliberative democracy is not only a multi-facet theoretical project (outlined briefly in the present article) but also a practice of promoting community participation and of introducing various, even non-standard, methods of participation. Such was the idea behind a presidential initiative in 2010 for setting up a platform for public discussion, Forum for Public Debate. The aims and objectives of the platform, its focus, underlying principles, as well as procedures in place and the results of what has been undertaken within its framework – they all show that the initiative is a clear manifestation of what is called deliberative democracy.
Źródło:
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica; 2014, 13; 201-219
2081-3333
Pojawia się w:
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tomorrow’s Europe deliberative poll as a proposal to research European public opinion
Sondaż deliberatywny Tomorrow’s Europe jako propozycja badania europejskiej opinii publicznej
Autorzy:
Krzewińska, Aneta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/413237.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
deliberative poll®
deliberation
public opinion
sondaż deliberatywny
deliberacja
opinia publiczna
Opis:
This article discusses a project known as Tomorrow’s Europe deliberative poll®, whose participants consisted of inhabitants of the 27 Member State countries of the European Union. The first section of the article presents the stages of that interesting study and briefly describes its most important results. The second section discusses essential issues to potential organizers of such polls, and more importantly to interpreters of the research data. It focuses on issues such as: problems related to conducting deliberations in a multilingual environment; the acculturation of the research method itself; the possibilities for researching Europea public opinion; and benefits resulting from this type of study
W artykule prezentuję sondaż deliberatywny® Tomorrow’s Europe, którego uczestnikami byli mieszkańcy 27 krajów-członków Unii Europejskiej. W pierwszej części artykułu przedstawiam etapy tego interesującego badania i pokrótce referuję jego najważniejsze rezultaty. Druga część poświęcona jest omówieniu kwestii istotnych dla potencjalnych organizatorów, a co ważniejsze interpretatorów otrzymanych rezultatów badań. Moja uwaga skupia się m.in. na: problemie związanym z prowadzeniem deliberacji w wielu językach, kwestii dotyczącej akulturacji samej metody badawczej, możliwościach zbadania europejskiej opinii publicznej oraz korzyściach wynikające z realizacji tego typu badań.
Źródło:
Przegląd Socjologiczny; 2012, 61, 4; 77-97
0033-2356
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Socjologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sondaż deliberatywny – inwentarz problemów
Deliberative polling – a list of problems
Autorzy:
Kubiak, Anna
Krzewińska, Aneta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/413328.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
sondaż deliberatywny
demokracja deliberatywna
deliberacja
deliberative polling
deliberative democracy
deliberation
Opis:
W artykule prezentujemy sondaż deliberatywny® – metodę badania opinii, stworzoną i opatentowaną przez Jamesa S. Fishkina. W pierwszej części opisujemy poszczególne etapy prowadzenia tego typu badań oraz prezentujemy sondaż, zrealizowany w Poznaniu w 2009 r. (jedyny przeprowadzony w Polsce), który dotyczył poglądów mieszkańców miasta na temat zarządzania stadionem po Mistrzostwach Europy w Piłce Nożnej EURO 2012. W drugiej części artykułu przedstawiamy wielowątkową metodologiczną analizę tej metody badawczej, wskazując na problemy związane z realizacją takiego badania, a także podkreślając zalety tego przedsięwzięcia, do których zaliczamy przede wszystkim aktywizowanie obywateli i włączanie ich w proces podejmowania decyzji.
In this paper we presented deliberative polling® – the opinion research method created and patented by James S. Fishkin. In the first part of the article we focused on phases of conducting this type of research and presented the only one so far in Poland deliberative polling® which was organized in Poznań in 2009. The researchers were interested in the opinions of residents on the management of the stadium after EURO 2012. In the second part we analysed the research method from a variety of points of view, we highlighted some of the problems connected with organizing of this type of research, but we underline advantages of this research. The most important advantages included on: stimulating of citizens to act and contribute into the process of making decisions.
Źródło:
Przegląd Socjologiczny; 2012, 61, 1; 9 - 30
0033-2356
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Socjologiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Panel obywatelski w perspektywie uczestników i uczestniczek
Citizen assembly in the perspective of participants and attendees
Autorzy:
Brzeziński, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40213107.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024-06-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
demokracja
partycypacja
deliberacja
panel obywatelski
democracy
participation
deliberation
citizens’ assembly
Opis:
The citizens’ assembly is a relatively new form of democracy, consisting of developing a thoughtful set of recommendations preceded by a detailed analysis of a given issue. The suggestions formulated are agreed upon by a representative group of residents and this process is preceded by an education phase that aims to provide participants with reliable knowledge regarding the subject of the panel. These characteristics make this co-decision mechanism increasingly popular, including in Poland. Citizens’ assemblies have been implemented in most major Polish cities. However, there is no doubt that for organizers, as well as for participants and urban communities, this is something new. Therefore, it seems important to conduct in-depth research on the implementation of panels in Polish conditions. In this context, the aim of the article is to present the results of a study on the II Łódź Citizens’ Assembly. The obtained results show that the citizens’ assembly is positively evaluated by those participating in it. Participants of the Łódź panel particularly emphasized its educational and social merits, while somewhat less so the political aspect, that is the opportunity to influence the city, which is the primary function of the panel.
Panel obywatelski to stosunkowo nowa forma demokracji, polegająca na wypracowaniu przemyślanego zbioru rekomendacji poprzedzonego szczegółowym przeanalizowaniem danego problemu. Formułowane sugestie uzgadniane są przez reprezentatywną grupę mieszkańców, a proces ten poprzedzony jest fazą edukacji, mającą na celu przekazanie uczestnikom rzetelnej wiedzy dotyczącej przedmiotu panelu. Właściwości te sprawiają, że ten mechanizm współdecydowania zyskuje coraz większą popularności, w tym także w Polsce. Panele obywatelskie zostały zrealizowane w większości polskich dużych miast. Nie ulega jednak wątpliwości, że dla organizatorów, a także dla uczestników oraz społeczności miejskich jest to coś nowego. W związku z powyższym ważne wydaje się prowadzenie pogłębionych badań dotyczących realizacji paneli w polskich warunkach. W tym kontekście celem artykułu jest przedstawienie rezultatów badania dotyczącego II Łódzkiego Panelu Obywatelskiego. Uzyskane wyniki dowodzą, że panel obywatelski jest pozytywnie ocenianym narzędziem przez osoby biorące w nim udział. Uczestnicy łódzkiego panelu w szczególności zwracali uwagę na jego walory edukacyjne i społeczno-towarzyskie, natomiast w nieco mniejszym stopniu na aspekt polityczny tj. możliwość wpływania na miasto, czyli podstawową funkcję panelu.
Źródło:
Nowa Polityka Wschodnia; 2024, 2(41); 43-60
2084-3291
Pojawia się w:
Nowa Polityka Wschodnia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 37

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies