Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Marshal of the Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Dopuszczalność dokonania przez Marszałka Sejmu ponownej oceny formalnej petycji w sytuacji, gdy wicemarszałek Sejmu upoważniony do wykonywania zadań Marszałka związanych z petycjami odmówił przekazania jej do rozpatrzenia
Admissibility of conducting by the Marshal of the Sejm a formal re‑assessment of a petition in a situation when the Vice-Marshal of the Sejm authorized to perform the tasks of the Marshal related to petitions refused to submit it for consideration
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2193753.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
Marshal of the Sejm
Vice-Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
The Vice-Marshal of the Sejm, who has been authorized by the Marshal of the Sejm to take action in matters related to petitions, does not exercise the competence to assess petitions on his own, but does so on behalf of the Marshal. This action should therefore be assessed, as if it were performed personally by the Marshal of the Sejm. The provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm do not provide for the possibility of re-assessment of petitions. Consequently, the petitioner’s request to re-examine the petition in order to possibly amend the decision to leave it unexamined cannot be satisfied.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2022, 1(73); 75-80
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat podstaw prawnych umieszczania flagi Unii Europejskiej na terenie Sejmu
Legal opinion on the legal basis for displaying of the European Union flag in the precincts of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Czarny, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12292948.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
flag
European Union
Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
According to the author, in the Polish legal system there is no regulation concerning the flag protocol. Therefore, the rules of diplomatic protocol as well as heraldry and vexillology customs are applied which allow for flying, apart from the national flag, also other symbols of states or international organizations. The author claims that, due to lack of provisions governing competence to determine which authority is an appropriate body for adopting flag protocols for particular public administration buildings, this should be the power of the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm, who – according to the Standing Orders of the Sejm – ensures order and decorum within the precincts of the Chamber.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 252-260
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
  • odwiedzone
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni niektórych przepisów ustawy o wykonywaniu inicjatywy ustawodawczej przez obywateli
Legal opinion on interpretation of certain provisions of the Act on Exercise of the Legislative Initiative by Citizens
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16539487.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
legislative initiative
bill
Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
The Marshal of the Sejm is not allowed to verify, whether an explanatory statement to a bill submitted by a group of citizens meets requirements specified in Articles 34 paras. 2 and 3 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. Besides, demanding enclosure – to the notification of the establishment of the Committee – of statements on accession to the legislative initiative committee and of a statement on selection of committee’s agent, is not based on rules of the Act of 24th June 1999 on Exercise of the Legislative Initiative by Citizens. Therefore the current practice of demanding the enclosure of the above documents cannot be continued in future.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 1(33); 65-75
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko
Legal opinion on the possibility of speaking in the debate on the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm by the Marshal of the Sejm or a Deputy recommended for this position
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223415.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
Deputy
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The author analyzes the normative model derived from the Standing Orders of the Sejm and confronts the theoretical assumptions with parliamentary practice accompanying the procedure for election of the Marshal of the Sejm, based on its similarity to the procedure for recall of the Marshal of the Sejm. He argues that the general principles set out in Chapter 2, “Debates of the Sejm” in Section III of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should apply to this matter in question. The said provisions do not provide for specific powers that would give the Deputies subject to the motion for the recall of the Marshal of the Sejm the right to speak in the debate in accordance with the rules different from those defining the procedure for taking floor by other speakers. It should be assumed that in the debate on a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm the questions in the debate can be responded by their intended addressees, i.e. a person subject to the motion or the designated candidate. There is no specific basis in the Standing Orders that would allow giving a speech by the Deputy subject to the motion when no question has been addressed to him/her during the debate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 75-82
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Podjęcie przez Marszałka Sejmu interwencji w ramach realizacji funkcji kontrolnych Sejmu
Intervention by the Marshal of the Sejm within the framework of the implementation of the control functions of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215810.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
parliamentary oversight
Marshal of the Sejm
state prosecution
Opis:
In the light of the binding provisions of law, the General Prosecutor is included in the subject matter of the oversight function of the Sejm. The statutory request for information and explanations may been perceived as the main instrument of parliamentary oversight serving to obtain information on specific proceedings conducted by the state prosecution.. The Marshal of the Sejm may refer a matter to the Committee on Justice and Human Rights, since the subject matter of activity of this committee includes matters related to the activities of the state prosecution, in order to obtain relevant information and express an opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2019, 3(63); 55-60
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją przepisów ustawy – Kodeks wyborczy
Assessment of conformity to the Constitution of the provisions of the Act – Electoral Code
Autorzy:
Esmund, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216079.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Electoral Code
Constitutional Tribunal
Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
The position of the Sejm refers to application of the Marshal of the Sejm initiating proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal. The position of the Sejm it was stated that the questioned provision of the Act – Electoral Code, in so far as it limits the competence of the Marshal of the Sejm to change the date of presidential elections after an occurrence of unpredictable, extraordinary circumstances hindering or preventing the holding of elections on the originally scheduled date, is unconstitutional. According to the applicant, the challenged provision violates the Constitution because it introduces additional, non-constitutional deadlines binding the Marshal of the Sejm in ordering elections to the office of the President of the Republic of Poland. It also excludes the constitutional competence of the Marshal of the Sejm to change the date of these elections and limits the possibility of ordering presidential elections by indicating a statutory holiday.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 277-290
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie normatywnych skutków wycofania petycji skierowanej do Sejmu
Legal opinion on the normative consequences of a withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216673.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The specificity of the proceedings in relation to petitions precludes the admissibility of discontinuance of the proceedings regarding consideration of a petition on the basis of appropriate application of Article 105 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. In case of withdrawal of a petition submitted to the Sejm, the body responsible for its consideration, i.e. the Petitions Committee, should make a decision about the way of proceeding with the petition. Withdrawal of the petition does not prevent its consideration. Given the open catalogue of the ways in which petitions can be proceeded, the Committee should be allowed to adopt a resolution to refuse consideration of the petition because of the applicant’s willingness to withdraw the petition
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 3(51); 64-68
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 10a ust. 4 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223414.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal of the Sejm
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The author provides an analysis of the provisions of Article 10a, para. 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the context of the time period within which it should consider a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm. She points out that the opportunity to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is complicated as compared to the election procedure,. The character of the time limit for consideration of the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm is not indicative, but mandatory. From an analysis of the concept of ‘the next sitting of the Sejm, it follows that the consideration of the motion and the putting thereof to a vote at the sitting that is “the first one after 7 days of its submission”.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 1(45); 71-74
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie odwoływania członków Rady Ochrony Pracy
Legal opinion on the dismissal of members of the Labour Protection Council
Autorzy:
Czarny, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216599.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
term of office
Marshal of the Sejm
Labour Protection Council
Opis:
The author argues that laconic regulation of the dismissal of members of the Labour Protection Council, in conjunction with the provisions specifying its composition and with the principle of personal discontinuation of parliament’s work, allows us to assume that the end of the term of the Sejm and the Senate may constitute a precondition for dismissal from membership of the Board of Deputies and Senators sitting in the chambers of previous term of office and for the appointment of their successors from among the members of parliament of a new term. The principle of rotation in the terms of office of the Labour Protection Council means that the Marshal of the Sejm may not dismiss its members at his/her own “discretion”. Because of such a flawed and unclear provisions of the Act on the National Labour Inspectorate, the existing law should, according to the author, be changed and supplemented.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 2(50); 199-208
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Around the Issue of Convening Meetings of the Sejm
Wokół problematyki zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu
Autorzy:
Pastuszko, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/940697.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
convening meetings of the Sejm Marshal of the Sejm
the Sejm
zwoływanie posiedzeń Sejmu Marszałek Sejmu
Sejm
Opis:
This article provides an analysis of selected problems regarding the mechanism for convening sessions of the Sejm by its Marshal. The author criticizes the adopted legal solutions, first of all paying attention to the excessive strengthening of the role of the chair- man of the first chamber of parliament in this respect. In his opinion, doubts must be raised by the fact that under the regulations, the right to convene meetings of the Sejm has got only the Marshal, whereas such entities such like parliamentary factions, as well as the President and the government, are formally deprived of it. In addition, he also shows the dilemmas that may arise in the course of applying those provisions in systemic practice. M. in here, he indicates the problem of setting dates of a sitting of the Sejm, inviting guests and the situation when a sitting cannot be convened for objective reasons.
Niniejszy artykuł zawiera analizę wybranych zagadnień związanych z problematyką zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu przez jego Marszałka. Autor krytykuje w nim przyjęte rozwiązania prawne, zwracając uwagę przede wszystkim na nadmierne wzmocnienie w tym zakresie roli przewodniczącego pierwszej izby parlamentu. Jego zdaniem wątpliwości musi budzić fakt, że na gruncie postanowień regulaminowych prawo do skutecznego zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu ma jedynie Marszałek, a nie dysponują nim podmioty takie jak frakcje parlamentarne, a także Prezydent i rząd. Obok tego wskazuje on również na dylematy jakie mogą się pojawić w toku stosowania rzeczonych przepisów w praktyce ustrojowej. Sygnalizuje on m. in. tutaj problem ustalania terminu posiedzenia Sejmu, zapraszania gości oraz sytuacji, gdy posiedzenie nie może zostać zwołane z przyczyn obiektywnych.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2019, 5 (51); 83-95
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tryb rozpatrywania przedłożonego przez Radę Języka Polskiego „Sprawozdania o stanie ochrony języka polskiego za lata 2016–2017”
Procedure for considering the “Report on the state of protection of the Polish language in 2016–2017” submitted by the Polish Language Council
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215979.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Polish language
Sejm committee
Marshal of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The report, submitted by the Council for the Polish Language, entitled “Language of political information”, contains an analysis of the problem that is narrow in scope. In the light of the current parliamentary practice, the narrow scope of the Council’s reports is typical and this has not been questioned in the course of parliamentary work. The decision of the Culture and Media Committee, resulting in a refusal to consider the document in question, is an expression of negation of the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to recognize this document as a report. Formally, the committee proceedings on the report had not been completed. The Committee should return to examining this document and complete its work, formulating an appropriate opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 2(66); 69-75
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie kompetencji Marszałka Sejmu dotyczących realizacji uprawnień poselskich wynikających z art. 19 ustawy o wykonywaniu mandatu posła i senatora
Legal opinion on the competence of the Marshal of the Sejm concerning the exercise by the Deputies’ of their right under Article 19 of the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a D eputy or Senator
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543077.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Polska
access to public information and Marshal of the Sejm
MEP
Opis:
The opinion states that the Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm is not competent to resolve disputes concerning the consequences of a refusal to provide information to a deputy by a company, pursuant to Article 19 of the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a Deputy or Senator. The opinion stated that in order to “defend their good name” the Deputies concerned may benefit from legal instruments to which all citizens are entitled. Measures applied against the Deputies do not violate the dignity of the Sejm and do not imply the need to defend their good name by the Marshal of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 3(43); 181-184
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
INSTYTUCJA MARSZAŁKA SENIORA SEJMU W POLSKIM PORZĄDKU PRAWNYM
THE INSTITUTION OF THE SENIOR MARSHAL OF THE SEJM IN THE POLISH LEGAL ORDER
Autorzy:
MAROŃ, GRZEGORZ
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/513066.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Senior Marshal of the Sejm
Sejm of the Republic of Poland
oath of office
first sitting of the Sejm
Opis:
The Senior Marshal is an honorary and ephemeral post in the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. The given institution dates back to 1919 and the Legislative Sejm in the Sec-ond Polish Republic. The Senior Marshal is appointed by the President from amongst the elder Deputies. There are three main competences of the Senior Marshal. He opens the first sitting of a newly elected Sejm, which is accompanied by the striking of the Mar-shal’s mace three times against the floor. Next he conducts the procedure of taking the oath of office of the Deputies. Finally he conducts the election of the Marshal of the Sejm. The last two functions the Senior Marshal performs with assistance of temporary secretaries appointed by him from amongst the youngest Deputies in such number as may be necessary to discharge such functions. The moment of taking the chair during the first sitting by newly elected Marshal of the Sejm terminates the parliamentary activity of the Senior Marshal in a given term of office of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Polityka i Społeczeństwo; 2014, 12, 2; 5-24 (20)
1732-9639
Pojawia się w:
Polityka i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pozycja ustrojowa marszałka Sejmu w projektach konstytucyjnych z lat 1989–1991
The Position of the Speaker of the Sejm in the Drafts of the Polish Constitution 1989–1991
Autorzy:
Kallas, Marian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621678.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
marszałek Sejmu, Konstytucja, parlamentaryzm polski, Senat
Polish Constitution, Sejm, Senat, Speaker, Marshal of the Sejm
Opis:
The text evaluates the proposed regulations of the position of the ruling and auxiliary organs in Polish parliament (Sejm). The analyzis covers 11 drafts of the Polish constitu- tion from 1989–1991. Among them there were: 2 parliamentary drafts, 4 coming from parties and 5 private ones. The vast majority of drafts concentrated on the position of the Speaker of the Sejm (so called Marshal). Only in two drafts, mainly in the draft prepared by the Senat in 1991, was the position of the Marshal weakened in favour of the Prezydium Sejmu, a collegial body which was supposed to steer the activity of both chambers of the Polish parliament. The further internal law of both chambers was supposed to determine the role and the structure of the internal organs of the parliament.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2015, 14, 1; 219-231
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Geneza i skutki dekonstytucjonalizacji Prezydium Sejmu - próba oceny
Autorzy:
Koksanowicz, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1041675.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Fundacja Niepodległości
Tematy:
sejm
prezydium sejmu
marszałek sejmu
organy kierownicze sejmu
presidium of the sejm
marshal of the sejm
governing bodies of the sejm
Opis:
The entry into force of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 meant the Presidium of the Sejm losing its status of a constitutional body. The justification for adopting such a solution was the conviction of the Constitution creators that there is no need to include in it the contents which lie within the autonomy of the Parliament and which may be regulated in the rules and regulations of the Sejm. However, the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium of the Sejm gave rise to some doubts when it comes to the interpretation of the constitutional provisions regulating the status of the Marshal of the Sejm. It also fundamentally influenced the process of directing the work of the Sejm. Therefore, it was a significant change in relation to the previous legal status; however, the importance of the said change (in my opinion) was not fully noticed. One of the effects of the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium was a change in the model of directing the work of the Sejm. A single-person model was introduced in place of the previous collegial manner of decision-making, and as a result the Marshal of the Sejm became the main governing body of the Chamber. After the lapse of over twenty years of adopting such solutions the author is inclined to make an attempt of the assessment of their functioning in the Polish political realities.
Źródło:
Prawo i Polityka; 2018, 8; 37-45
2080-5799
Pojawia się w:
Prawo i Polityka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies