Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "styl dworkowy" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Ze studiów nad tożsamością miejsca. Problem kontynuacji formy dworu w krajobrazie wielkopolskiej wsi na obszarze Ziemi Średzkiej
A study on the identity of a place. The problem of continuation of manorial form in the rural landscape of Środa Land in greater polano region
Autorzy:
Mikulski, D.
Raszeja, E.
Klause, G.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/107155.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydział Biologiczno-Rolniczy
Tematy:
tożsamość
krajobraz wiejski
dwór
styl dworkowy
Ziemia Średzka
identity
rural landscape
manor
manorial style
Środa Land
Opis:
Krajobraz Ziemi Średzkiej ewoluował przez wieki, lecz wyrazisty i trwały wizerunek nadał mu dopiero wiek XIX, którego odzwierciedleniem są miedzy innymi założenia dworskie oraz wiążący je system relacji przestrzenno-krajobrazowych. Chociaż tradycję kultury ziemiańskiej przerwała drastycznie II wojna światowa, to nadal istnieje masowa fascynacja „polskim dworem" jako wzorcem architektonicznym. Zaowocowało to z jednej strony ochroną i konserwacją zabytkowej substancji, a z drugiej, współczesnymi realizacjami domów mieszkalnych nawiązującymi do barokowych i klasycystycznych form siedziby ziemiańskiej, pozbawionych jednak kontekstu krajobrazowego. W związku z tym należałoby zadać pytanie: czy w przestrzeni wiejskiej jest miejsce, możliwość i sens kontynuacji wartości architektoniczno-krajobrazowych, które składają się na ideowy obraz „dworu polskiego"? W tym kontekście istotne wydaje się określenie zasad kształtowania przestrzeni służących ochronie tożsamości na obszarze Ziemi Średzkiej.
The landscape of Środa Land has been evolving over the centuries. However, it became distinct and permanent only in the 19th century. It is reflected by manor complexes, which are bound with a system of spatial and scenic relations. Although the tradition of landowner culture was drastically interrupted by World War II, the Polish manor as an architectural model is still fascinating to a large number of people. On the one hand, this fascination resulted in protection and conservation of historical places. On the other hand, the designs of modern residential buildings are inspired by baroque and classist forms of landowners' manors, but they lack the scenic context. In view of this fact, we should ask the question whether in rural areas there is space and possibility and if it makes sense to continue the architectural and scenic values which make the conceptual image of the Polish manor. It is significant to specify the rules of spatial development to protect the identity of Środa Land.
Źródło:
Topiarius. Studia krajobrazowe; 2016, T. 1; 97-114
2449-9595
2543-926X
Pojawia się w:
Topiarius. Studia krajobrazowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Odbudowa dworców Kolei Warszawsko- -Wiedeńskiej i linii Warszawsko-Kaliskiej po I wojnie światowej: Pruszków – Grodzisk Mazowiecki – Żyrardów – Radziwiłłów oraz Teresin/Szymanów
Rebuilding the stations of the Warsaw-Vienna Railway and of the Warsaw-Kalisz line after World War I: Pruszków – Grodzisk Mazowiecki – Żyrardów – Radziwiłłów and Teresin/ Szymanów
Autorzy:
Dudkowski, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538154.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Bronisław Brochwicz-Rogoyski
dworzec kolejowy
Gdynia
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
Modlin
Pruszków
Romuald Miller
styl dworkowy
styl narodowy
styl swojski
Szymanów
Teresin
Żyrardów
Kolej Warszawsko-Wiedeńska
railway station
manor house style
national style
country style
Warsaw-Vienna Railway
Opis:
Railway station buildings, with beautiful structures and ornamentation, originating from the age-long tradition of the Polish building engineering, are well-established in our landscape. The architectural form of those railway stations is closely connected with the period of rebuilding the country after the destructions of World War I. The creative solutions of architects at that time, that included forms of so-called country style, now referred to as national or manor house ones, supported the reviving Polish state and were connected with a search for roots of own identity and the elimination of cultural traces of the occupant states. The railways, functioning in the period of partitions of Poland, were destroyed during military activities. The state of railway infrastructure in the reviving Poland was catastrophic. The end of the period of partitions and the turmoil of war was followed by the time of freedom and euphoria. The rebuilding of state structures of the country was undertaken immediately. In order to maintain and use the existing railway lines and build new ones, the Railway Routes Division was established within the Warsaw Railway Directorate. The design works connected with rebuilding the railway stations were performed in the architectural section of the Railway Routes Division and managed by Bronisław Brochwicz-Rogoyski, an experienced architect, whilst his deputies were Romuald Miller and Józef Wołkanowski. The design study, arranged by Rogoyski and Miller within the architectural section, faced various problems regarding reconstruction of railway stations, like a lack of archival technical files of the former railway buildings and, at the same time, due to the poor financial condition of the country after the war, a necessity to use the walls which had survived. Finally, two solutions were adopted at rebuilding railway station buildings: either their previous architectural form was restored with certain functional modifications or completely new buildings were designed, sometimes using the walls which had survived. In the latter case, the structures were reconstructed using the so-called country style. As early as in March 1920, there were reports in the press on first completed investments. At the turn of 1921 and 1922, building works at the 12 railway stations buildings in Pruszków, Żyrardów, Grodzisk, Radziwiłłów, Skierniewice, Teresin, Modlin, Zieleniec, Urle, Biała, Chotyłów and Terespol were completed. The author of most of the designs was the architect Romuald Miller. The head of the architectural section, Bronisław Brochwicz-Rogoyski, died in 1921. His successor was Romuald Miller, who held the post until 1924. The first group of rebuilt railway structures included the railway station buildings in Pruszków, Grodzisk Mazowiecki and Żyrardów. At each of those stations, there was a building before World War I, constructed at the turn of 1870s and 1880s by the Directorate of the Warsaw-Vienna Railway. Like on other stations of that line, they were typical brick buildings. The architectural form given to them during their reconstruction after war destructions was, on the one hand, an outcome of the recommendation in the architectonic section to use the country style and, one the other hand, the “polonization” of their architecture resulted, as it seems, from the political and patriotic obligation felt by the architects personally. The railway station buildings in Pruszków, Grodzisk Mazowiecki and Żyrardów were rebuilt using the relics of their old walls. The twin buildings in Radziwiłłów and Teresin/Szymanów were built anew. The rebuilding was planned for the years 1920-1922. It should be underlined that the principle of making the architectural form of railway station buildings uniform on the Warsaw-Vienna Railway (for example, the buildings in Żyrardów, Grodzisk Mazowiecki) or the Warsaw-Terespol Railway or the Vistula River Railroad (for example, wooden buildings at the railway stations in Gąsocin, Ciechanów) was executed as early as at the beginning of functioning or, in many cases, even during the construction of those lines. At that time, however, the typization of railway station buildings resulted primarily from the intention of maximum simplification and reduction of costs of their construction. On the other hand, making the architectural form of the railway stations uniform, executed in the first years after regaining independence by Poland, was a manifestation of their designers to give their architecture a mark of vernacularity and a Polish character.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 1; 77-94
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies