Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Szanowni Czytelnicy!
Dear Readers!
Autorzy:
Gawlicki, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535844.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Ochrona Zabytków
Opis:
For quite some time the Polish conservation milieu has been involved in a lively discussion on the deteriorating state of our cultural heritage, assorted threats, unsatisfactory theoretical interpretations that do not provide answers to many simple questions, and mundane financial problems hampering suitable documentation or professional studies and the conservation of monuments. Against the backdrop of this discussion there have emerged conceptions of organisational and systemic transformations, which, briefly, refer to the direct supervision of the general conservator over the offices of the voivodeship conservators of monuments. Our editorial board has decided to expand this discussion by presenting various views concerning the theoretical aspects of the foundations of the protection of monuments. I regard opinions formulated outside the conservation circles to be of particular importance since they make it possible to view our problems without emulating well-worn schemes and reducing the discussion to a strictly organisational level. Within this context I heartily recommend the text by Dr. Simon Thurley, the head of English Heritage, read during the third annual European Heritage Heads Forum held in May 2008 in Copenhagen. The principles of the protection of historical monuments are simply a codification of the decision-making process, based on a modern assessment of the value of monuments. You will find all the details in an English Heritage publication entitled Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance – try the English Heritage internet site or the library of the National Heritage Board of Poland. Knowledge about the reasons for protecting a historical monument, the basis of this protection, as well as the monument’s particular elements and environment should support the whole process of protection, from recording a given monument in a register, its suitable utilisation and administration to decision making and correctly conducted conservation or adaptation. Any gaps will lead to numerous errors and even the loss of valuable monuments. Many Readers may find the text about the phenomenological definition of the monuments to be of special interest. The study in question makes it possible to view the apparently completed concept of the monument from a wider perspective than the traditional one. Alongside questions dealing with the creation of modern conservation protection and a search for the sources of the definition and phenomenon of the monuments, we also tackle topics associated with the current shape of the Polish register of monuments, its contents and the role, which it should perform in the national system of the protection of the cultural heritage. Within the context of the binding statutory regulations, inclusion into the register, which until now has been the only universally applied form of the protection of monuments, proves to be not only ineffective but also incomplete, and does not reflect the richness and diversity of the Polish cultural heritage. I wish you pleasant reading. Respectfully yours Marcin Gawlicki Director of the National Heritage Board of Poland
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 2; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wielce Szanowni Państwo...
Dear Honourable Readers...
Autorzy:
Serafinowicz, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538073.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ochrona Zabytków
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Opis:
Dear Honourable Readers, dear Authors, priceless Reviewers whose extensive knowledge makes editing and publishing of “Ochrona Zabytków” possible! Tempus fugit… It would seem that not long ago we handed over the second volume of Anno Domini 2014, along with Christmas wishes, to our Readers. As I am writing the introduction to the second volume of Anno Domini 2015, it is hard for me to believe that another year goes by, that the Advent is already there and Christmas is around the bend. Therefore, it is time to start thinking about new fascicules, new important and interesting topics and, to be honest, it is not that easy. In our editorial room, we are currently observing a certain, hopefully temporary, decline in the willingness to write about a broadly understood cultural heritage, about interesting and important conservation work carried out at universities and research centres. Perhaps, the situation I am talking about is related to the need to publish results of research and conservation work at higher education institutions, their bulletins and studies. In any case, the Noble Matron the “Ochrona Zabytków” still remains, certainly deserves attention, being (perhaps mutatis mutandis) the oldest Polish scientific periodical dealing with the protection of heritage in all of its dimensions, which can be well exemplified, in my opinion, by another fascicule presented to you, with a number 2/2015, containing 10 sections providing diversified and rich subject matter, starting from architectural research, through iconographic, technical and technological issues in conservation, to legal and economic issues and those related to UNESCO World Heritage. This volume is accompanied by reviews of publications as well as a report concerning a legal seminar. The volume is crowned by a remembrance of Michał Gradowski – a notable researcher and expert in goldsmith’s craft, awarded with a Gloria Artis medal. Dear Readers, before I turn to Christmas wishes, let me remind you about a curious, albeit little known, fact concerning (to a certain extent) the National Heritage Board of Poland – abbreviated as NID. It turns out that during World War II this abbreviation was used by a (British) Navy Intelligence Division. After all, this is quite a nice affinity. It is linked to a further story including Krystyna Skarbek, Ian Fleming, James Bond, Vesper Lynd and the entire Casino Royale (1953). In this way we are lightly and merrily entering the Christmas atmosphere. Let us all be of good cheer – Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Jacek Serafinowicz Editor-in-Chief
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 2; 4-5
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wielce szanowni Państwo, drodzy Czytelnicy, Autorzy i bezcenni Recenzenci „Ochrony Zabytków”!
Ladies and Gentlemen, dear Readers, Authors and invaluable Reviewers of “Ochrona Zabytków”!
Autorzy:
Serafinowicz, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538418.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ochrona Zabytków
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Opis:
We are proud to present you another volume of the semi-annually published by the National Heritage Board of Poland, identified with the number 1/2015. As it was announced in the introduction to the previous fascicle, the first part of this volume is a continuation of the topics connected with the memory of the Great War, the outbreak of which was described in simple words by Jaroslav Hašek: “And somewhere, from the dark depths of centuries, the truth approached Europe that tomorrow would thwart the plans of the present”. In his Sztafeta, the invaluable Melchior Wańkowicz summed up roughly the material losses which affected the territory of Poland directly. Years later, Zofia Starowieyska-Morstinowa, in her memoirs, wonderfully written and published in 1962, reminded Wańkowicz’s calculations which show directly that ”one million eighty-four thousand buildings, 56% of the prewar railway rolling stock, 63% of railway stations, 390 big and 219 small bridges were destroyed, the cultivation of four and a half million hectares of farmland was given up, three million people were displaced, 130 million meters of wood were taken away without any compensation. In Łódź, 1300 kilometers of leather strap belt was torn out of machines, one hundred tons of copper parts was torn out of the most valuable machines, 100,000 motors, engines and machine tools were seized”. Above all, however, millions of innocent people were crippled or killed. Thus, it is not surprising that, in the first part of this volume, we will find threads concerning the rebuilding of the country after the war, as well as immanent funerary threads, which now constitute the common heritage of the hecatomb of at least several nations of the generation of our grandmothers and grandfathers. In the following parts of this volume, we are presenting stricte conservatory and research issues, at the same time not ignoring the topics related to iconography. A unique supplement to the volume is an overview of the book by Professor Bogumiła Rouba entitled Pielęgnacja świątyni i innych zabytków. Książka nie tylko dla księży (Care of the churches and other monuments. A book not only for priests). A good addition to that manual is a very interesting announcement devoted to the equipment for the safe protecting the icon of the Black Madonna of Częstochowa. This volume of “Ochrona Zabytków” began to be prepared in winter. Now, at the beginning of the summer, it is time for wishing you carefree and warm holidays, abounding with good experiences. Yours faithfully Jacek Serafinowicz Editor-in-Chief
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 1; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dziedzictwo kulturowe województwa wielkopolskiego w świetle danych Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa. Przykład zabytków nieruchomych
Autorzy:
Siniecka, Anna
Bogacka, Emilia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/911629.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-07-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturowe
zabytki nieruchome
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
województwo wielkopolskie
Opis:
Otaczające nas dziedzictwo kulturowe stanowi cenny zasób będący świadectwem naszej historii, którego zachowanie dla przyszłych pokoleń jest niezwykle istotne. Artykuł przedstawia dziedzictwo kulturowe w województwie wielkopolskim, regionie o szczególnym znaczeniu dla powstania i rozwoju całego państwa. Analizie zostały poddane zabytki nieruchome znajdujące się w rejestrze zabytków Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa.
Źródło:
Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna; 2018, 44; 53-65
2353-1428
Pojawia się w:
Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Państwo!
Ladies and Gentlemen!
Autorzy:
Florjanowicz, Paulina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539138.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
4. Europejskie Forum Dziedzictwa
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Ochrona Zabytków
Europejskie Dni Dziedzictwa
Opis:
Heritage preservation is a process. A process of identifying, researching, documenting, maintening, monitoring, documenting, etc. The process is a timely ordered sequence of changes or conditions occurring one after another. Each process is a function carrier, and functions make up the system. The heritage preservation is not a process that occurs in isolation. Instead, it plays a function important from the perspective of the human environment understood as a system in cultural, environmental, social and economic terms. Caring for the correctness of the protection of monuments, one cannot forget the context, causes and consequences of this process. This edition of “Ochrona Zabytków” (“Protection of Monuments”) reflects upon this. Traditionally, you can find precisely described examples of research and conservation works regarding a number of historic monuments. However, the theme of this edition is the heritage value from the economic perspective. It’s not about a commercial approach to monuments, but about perception and description of the importance of monuments for the modern socio-economic processes. An intelligent usage of heritage resources by man does not have to mean compromising their values. On the other hand, assigning social and economic context to the heritage values significantly increases chances for its preservation. An important voice in the debate on the economic potential of the cultural heritage was the 4th European Heritage Forum which took place in Wrocław in 2011 under the slogan “Value your heritage! The European heritage and economic development”. The conference, which was co-organized by the Council of Europe, the European Commission and the National Heritage Board of Poland, brought together more than 250 experts from dozens of countries around the world. It was one of the official events of the Polish Presidency over the Council of the European Union. It also became a turning point in the European debate on the importance of the heritage to the European economy, especially in times of crisis. At the end of its work, the 4th European Heritage Forum adopted a final declaration which reads as follows: The participants in the 4th European Heritage Forum, held in the city of Wrocław, Poland, on 10-12 October 2011: • recognising the value of heritage to society in this beautiful, historic and multicultural city and in all cities and territories throughout Europe; • noting a continued need in all sectors for a greater understanding of the potential which heritage can offer for quality of life and the needs for its integration in planning for an economically sustainable future; and • fully conscious of the current pressures upon resources, both public and private recommend, in the context of European Heritage Days activities, that: 1. all relevant actors should seek to balance the potential social, cultural and economic benefits when using heritage as a resource; 2. strategies should be developed for evaluating and demonstrating the positive economic and social benefits to local communities of conservation and access to the heritage; 3. a community-focussed approach has the potential to mobilise resources for sustainable heritage development, conservation and access; 4. the EHD programme should focus resources on increasing the European dimension, encouraging exchange, collaboration and cross-border event development, with the object of promoting a vision of a common European heritage. And, finally, recommend that future European Heritage Days be taken forward in the positive spirit and on the basis of our discussions here in Wrocław in a truly collaborative manner, emphasising diversity as a source of strength and not of division and highlighting our shared European heritage as well as our rich local, regional and national heritages. Declaration of Wrocław has become a corner stone laying the foundations for projects at local and European level, the common denominator of which is the search for answers to questions about how we should sustainably use the potential of the historic monuments, as nobody will dispute that it’s well worth doing it. Also the National Heritage Board of Poland has since launched a number of activities in this field: social studies, development of a model of heritage impact on the economy, and many more. A lot of work is still ahead of us, but today I encourage you to read the texts which are a major breakthrough in the way the process of historic preservation is perceived in a broader context, in accordance with the requirements of the twenty-first century. Paulina Florjanowicz Director of the National Heritage Board of Poland
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2013, 1-4; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Drodzy Czytelnicy,
Dear Readers,
Autorzy:
Stachańczyk, Renata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536474.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
„Ochrona Zabytków”
konserwacja zabytkowych ogrodów
ogrody zabytkowe
Opis:
It is with pleasure that we present to you the recent issue of “Ochrona Zabytków” magazine. It differs from previous editions as it is entirely devoted to conservation of historic gardens. Here, in Poland, this field has truly impressive achievements as we are one of the few European countries to hold a considerable collection of garden documents (records), and to develop – in the post-war period – research methods as well as following methodology taught in a plethora of academic centres. Furthermore, it may seem that applicable legal acts and international recommendations are sufficient tools to protect this particular type of heritage. Nevertheless, as a consequence of failing to grasp the phenomena of a garden – with its essence and artistic value – and due to the necessity to adopt measures other than for historic architecture, decisions regarding gardens often raise much controversy. We are observing occurrences that prove disturbing especially in the context of the increasing resources allocated to conservation and restoration of historic gardens. As a result, we are witnessing a process which would be unthinkable a few decades ago, when the majority of works was carried out within the inner management of the historic site. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the notion of recreating historical garden compositions, which should be an aftermath of a far-reaching process and not a one-time act. This process involves conservators struggling to make various substantive decisions, and as there is no one universal path to follow, all options and conditions must be taken into account. In 2014, the celebration of the 10th anniversary of inscribing the Polish-German Mużakowski Park on the UNESCO World Heritage List proved to be a unique opportunity to call to mind the principles of conduct towards historic gardens, in particular, the doctrine for conservation in relation to this type of heritage, and to discuss current issues and tendencies. Inscribing Mużakowski Park, whose eastern part is managed by the National Heritage Board of Poland on behalf of the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, on the UNESCO World Heritage List is one of the key points of park’s revitalisation process which started at the beginning of 1990s and was initiated by predecessors of the Board in cooperation with the manager of German part of the site. The inscription emphasised the efforts of Polish manager that went into rescuing the park – without it, this precious site would go down only in the history of landscape gardening. The wide range of conservation works carried out by both managers is unprecedented in Europe and constitutes an example of good practices in the field of historic garden conservation. The National Heritage Board of Poland – an organiser of the “Historic gardens as objects of maintenance, conservation and restoration” conference which was held from 11 to 13 September 2014 in the Żagań Palace and outdoors in the Mużakowski Park to commemorate the inscription – has committed to remind us that historic gardens must be treated in a different manner than other types of heritage due to special characteristics of their material, longevity and value of composition. Moreover, the conference was to present European views on standards of conduct and to discuss on a spectrum of possibilities related to selecting the right path prior to deciding on measures to be adopted. Most papers read by speakers from Poland and abroad have been adapted to the requirements set out for academic writing, and subsequently collected in a volume that is presented to you. We strongly believe that our Readers will learn more on the subject of historic gardens which so far has rarely been raised in “Ochrona Zabytków” magazine. A garden is a type of historic site that requires continuous care, in particular constant and professional maintenance. Understanding its complexity is the foundation of any revitalisation process and a guarantee for maintaining its inherent value. Without it, our conservation efforts will result in passing to future generations our mere representations of historic garden achievements that will have nothing to do with the real thing. dr inż. Renata Stachańczyk The Manager of the Revitalisation Project of Mużakowski Park, Head of the Team for expert opinions and analysis of historic landscape The National Heritage Board of Poland
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2016, 1; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Poland for World Heritage/La Pologne pour le patrimoine mondial, Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, Warszawa 2013
Autorzy:
Olbryś, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536409.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
konserwacja zabytków
Lista światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego UNESCO
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 2; 245-250
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Ochrona zabytków numizmatycznych” Seminarium naukowe, Opole, 8 września 2011 r.
Scientific seminar “Protection of numismatic monuments”, Opole, 8th September 2011
Autorzy:
Kaczorowska, Bogna
Kaczorowska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538741.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zabytki numizmatycznie
Narodowy Instytut Muzealnictwa i Ochrony Zbiorów
NIMiOZ
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
NID
numizmatyka
Opis:
A scientific seminar on protection of numismatic monuments organized by the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Opole and the Customs Chamber in Opole with the cooperation of the Financial Law Association „Aureus” took place on 8th September 2011 in Opole. There were two papers presented during the seminar, both accompanied with multimedia presentation. Marcin Sabaciński (National Heritage Board of Poland, Archeology Department) focused on the presentation of institutional system of monuments protection in Poland and Polish legal regulations on protection and care of cultural heritage. Michał Zawadzki (Director of Numismatic Collection of the Royal Castle in Warsaw) gave a paper on the numismatics as a scientific discipline and presented the main types of historical coins, banknotes and other collector’s items as well as the characteristics of the numismatic market in Poland. The participants of the discussion held during the seminar paid attention to the need for closer cooperation among different entities dealing with protection of monuments, as well as for appropriate legislative initiatives in this field.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2010, 1-4; 289-294
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Państwo, drodzy Czytelnicy, Autorzy i Recenzenci „Ochrony Zabytków”!
Dear Sirs and Madams, dear Readers, Authors and Reviewers of the “Ochrona Zabytków”!
Autorzy:
Serafinowicz, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535221.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ochrona Zabytków
konwencja UNESCO
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
dziedzictwo niematerialne
Lista światowego dziedzictwa UNESCO
Opis:
We present to you another fascicle of jointly created periodical (in the current six-monthly form) – a collective work, which can be, without exaggeration, described as: joint effort. If I were to title it separately, the title would be: Between tangible and intangible heritage – the idea of comprehensive protection of the world’s cultural and natural heritage. It sounds elevated, maybe even pompous, however – as we know well – in the global perspective, there are diverse situations, a current example might be the devastated Aleppo, which is, after all, not the only site of crime against cultural heritage. The threads of intangible heritage, in this volume, both from the perspective of up-to-date UNESCO documents and conventions, and from the perspective of “archaeology of notions” and research on intangible heritage of the Polish rural areas, as well as the narratives of collective memory, constitute the first part of the volume. The second part, on the other hand, for a kind of a counterweight, is devoted only to tangible heritage, focusing on the issues of wooden architecture, and strictly speaking, on wooden sacral construction, on both sides of the Polish-Ukrainian border in which we see a tremendous potential for further common research and academic cooperation. The second part of the volume is concluded by an interesting article devoted to framework architecture of Uhlans’ barracks in Toruń. In the third, final part, we present articles of diverse subject matter, a considerable substantive significance, discussing, among others, Polish successes related to entries on the UNESCO’s World Heritage List to which the National Heritage Board of Poland contributed greatly, but also presenting hazards concerning possible further entries, which should not be forgotten, just like we should not forget about people of exceptional merits, whose profiles we recall. Let us return, however, to our reality and our questions about intangible heritage. What is it for an ordinary inhabitant of the country between the Odra River and the Bug River, how does our ordinary compatriot understand them and does he or she have keys to it, or has someone hidden it, to use a euphemism..? It seems there is a long march ahead of us. If today someone asked me about what I believe to be the most important throughout our entire spectrum of the intangible heritage, I would certainly reply: my homeland and my faith. And if I was asked what I would most gladly enter to the intangible heritage list, I would say: all Polish “żurawiejka” poems, even though they might be obscene, including my favourite, which I would not dare to quote. Not so long ago, on the occasion of a full, six-hundredth anniversary of concluding the Horodło Union, Kazimierz Wóycicki from the Eastern Europe Study Centre of the Warsaw University wrote: „We live in the 21st century, and we still think in categories of the 19th century. This happens because great narrations determining the sense of modern nations were created exactly in the 19th century, when the most important thing was defending identity against external impacts. Historiography of remembrance, dealing with social representations of the past, enables gaining a distance to those tales shaped in the 19th century, through a dialogue of narratives” and, at the same time, enables expansion of the methodological scope of research on phenomena related to intangible heritage. Dear Sirs and Madams, to conclude, I would like to give my regards to the entire editorial team, who for a few recent years, working with devotion, perfection and energy, have done truly a lot in the Kraków office – it can be said without a shade of exaggeration that they re-formatted and modernized the way of thinking about our periodical. I would like to thank wholeheartedly, not only on my own behalf, the editor Ms. Olga Dyba, the editorial secretary – Mr. Andrzej Siwek and the editor Mr. Tomasz Woźniak. Dear friends – you are real professionals, and a hard act to follow... Yours respectfully Jacek Serafinowicz Editor-in-Chief
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 3-5
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Selected areas and results of the activities of the National Institute of Culture Heritage for the protection and care of monuments in the years 2015-2019 = Wybrane obszary i rezultaty działań Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa na rzecz obrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019
Wybrane obszary i rezultaty działań Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa na rzecz obrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019
Autorzy:
Landmann, Tomasz
Powiązania:
Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces 2022, nr 2, s. 196-213
Data publikacji:
2022
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Ochrona zabytków
Zabytki kultury
Artykuł problemowy
Artykuł z czasopisma wojskowego
Opis:
Artykuł dotyczy ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego i wzmacniania bezpieczeństwa kulturowego Polski, co omówiono na przykładzie działań podjętych przez Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa w latach 2015-2019. Opisano założenie, główne zadania i aspekty prawne działalności NID oraz efekty przeprowadzonych prac dotyczących ochrony zabytków. Przedstawiono dane statystyczne, roczne sprawozdania z działalności i raporty opublikowane przez NID. Aktywność NID dotyczyła głównie ewidencjonowania i dokumentowania zabytków, monitorowania i przeciwdziałania zagrożeniem dla dziedzictwa kulturowego i realizowania zadań szkoleniowo-informacyjnych.
Tabele, wykresy.
Bibliografia, netografia na stronach 210-212.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Inwentaryzacja dzieł sztuki i rzemiosła artystycznego w dawnym klasztorze Cystersów w Krzeszowie
Inventory of works of art and artistic handicraft in the former Cistercian Monastery at Krzeszów
Autorzy:
Sebzda, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536367.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Krzeszów
Lwów
cystersi
benedyktyni
benedyktynki
inwentaryzacja
dzieła sztuki
karty ewidencyjne
rejestr zabytków
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Opis:
The complex of the former Cistercian Abbey at Krzeszów has a long history that dates back to the 13th century. Its heyday were the second half of the 17th and the 18th centuries, when refurbishments and expansions made it an important centre of Baroque, that attracted the then leading Silesian and Czech artists. On 31 May 1946, Benedictine sisters deported from the All Saints’ monastery in Lwów (Lviv) arrived at the abbey with their belongings. They noticed the need to record the works of art collected in the Krzeszów monastery. The inventory has been carried out by the Local Division of the National Heritage Board of Poland (NHBP) in Wrocław, since 2008. In December 2012, the first phase of the operation was concluded. Until then, 1006 items were registered, for which 710 records of movable historical items were established. The records, developed by the Local Division of the NHBP in Wrocław in the years 2008-2012, set the basis for three decisions to include in the register of historical monuments 416 works of art from both the Krzeszów and Lwów collections. Another such decision is currently being prepared. Previous decisions enabled the sisters to gain funds necessary to renovate the Baroque painting of St. Fortunate from the Lwów monastery church, as well as 12 portraits of Lwów prioresses. The developed records were disseminated in the scientific and museum communities, i.a. as an auxiliary material attached to a publication on Roman-Catholic churches and monasteries of the former Ruthenian Voivodeship. Works of art from the abbey were first displayed at the exhibitions “Glory of Krzeszów” („Blask Krzeszowa”) and „Ora et labora” at Kamienna Góra in 2010-2012. The inventory completed until now, covers works of art from the Cistercian and Benedictine collections. The planned second phase of operation will mainly address the items the Benedictine sisters managed to salvage, by bringing them to Krzeszów.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 161-164
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wybrana problematyka z zakresu zabytków nieruchomych w dokumentach planistycznych
Selected issues of immovable monuments in planning documents
Autorzy:
Siniecka, A.
Bogacka, E.
Rutkowski, A.
Sydor, S.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2032093.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
zabytek nieruchomy
dokumenty planistyczne
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
immovable monument
planning documents
National Heritage Board of Poland
Opis:
Praca dotyczy wybranej problematyki z zakresu zabytków nieruchomych w dokumentach planistycznych gmin: Bielice, Gryfino, Kołbaskowo, Stare Czarnowo i Widuchowa. Postępowanie polegało na porównaniu treści z zakresu dziedzictwa i krajobrazu kulturowego zawartych w: studiach uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego gmin, rejestrze Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa i Planie Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego. Pozwoliło to na wykazanie niespójności w aspekcie dziedzictwa kulturowego w dokumentach planistycznych oraz na wskazanie dobrych praktyk w procesie opieki nad materialnym dziedzictwem kulturowym.
The work concerns selected issues of immovable monuments in planning documents of the communes: Bielice, Gryfino, Kołbaskowo, Stare Czarnowo i Widuchowa. The proceedings aimed at comparison of heritage and cultural landscape contents in: studies of conditions and directions of communes spatial development, the register of the National Heritage Board of Poland and the Spatial Development Plan of the Westpomeranian Region. This allowed to show inconcistencies in the aspect of cultural heritage in planning documents and to indicate good practices in the proces of caring for material cultural heritage.
Źródło:
Biuletyn Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN; 2018, 270; 54-66
0079-3493
Pojawia się w:
Biuletyn Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Selected areas and results of the activities of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage for the protection and care of monuments in the years 2015-2019
Wybrane obszary i rezultaty działań Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa na rzecz ochrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019
Autorzy:
Landmann, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29551746.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Akademia Wojsk Lądowych imienia generała Tadeusza Kościuszki
Tematy:
National Institute of Cultural Heritage
protection of monuments
Polska
monument
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
ochrona zabytków
Polska
zabytek
Opis:
In the article, the subject of considerations is the effects of actions of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage in selected areas of monument protection and care in the years 2015-2019. The undertaken subject corresponds to the protection of cultural heritage in the context of strengthening the cultural security of the Republic of Poland. The purpose of the considerations is to present the results of the activities of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage in the system of protection and care of monuments in Poland, in the years 2015-2019, taking into account selected areas of task implementation by the cultural institution under study. The analysis is based on statistical data published by the National Institute of Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as NID) in periodic and annual reports on the activities of the institution, in additional reports, as well as on scientific literature on the protection and care of historical monuments. In the article, it was established that NID has carried out numerous activities for the protection and care of monuments, and thus the protection of cultural heritage in the context of strengthening the cultural security of the Republic of Poland. The main areas of activities of NID concerned maintaining records and documentation of monuments, monitoring and counteracting threats to cultural heritage, as well as performance of training and information tasks. Opinions and expertise issued for public administration bodies and the implementation of programmes for the protection and care of monuments were important.
Przedmiotem rozważań w artykule jest problematyka efektów działań podjętych przez Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa w wybranych obszarach ochrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019. Podejmowana tematyka koresponduje z ochroną dziedzictwa kulturowego w kontekście wzmacniania bezpieczeństwa kulturowego RP. Celem rozważań jest przedstawienie rezultatów działań NID w systemie ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami w Polsce w latach 2015-2019, z uwzględnieniem wybranych dziedzin realizacji zadań przez opisywaną instytucję kultury. Analizę oparto na danych statystycznych opublikowanych przez Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa w okresowych, rocznych sprawozdaniach z działalności instytucji, dodatkowych raportach, a ponadto na literaturze naukowej z problematyki ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami. W artykule ustalono, że NID realizował liczne działania na rzecz ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami, a tym samym ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego w kontekście wzmacniania bezpieczeństwa kulturowego RP. Główne obszary działań NID dotyczyły ewidencjonowania i dokumentowania zabytków, monitorowania i przeciwdziałania zagrożeniom dla dziedzictwa kulturowego, a także realizowania zadań szkoleniowo-informacyjnych. Ważne były wydawane opinie i ekspertyzy dla organów administracji publicznej i realizacja programów na rzecz ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami.
Źródło:
Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces; 2022, 54, 2(204); 196-213
2544-7122
2545-0719
Pojawia się w:
Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies