Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 862
Tytuł:
Zmiany w składzie osobowym senatu i izby poselskiej w okresie Sejmu Wielkiego
Changes in the Composition of the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies during the Great Sejm
Autorzy:
Kacperczyk, Urszula
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/23352272.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-31
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Senat
Sejm
Sejm Czteroletni
Sejm Wielki
posłowie
Opis:
The Four-Year Sejm (diet) was held from October 6th, 1788 to May 29th, 1792 and resulted in significant changes in the composition of parliament, both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. To 177 members elected by the regional diets in August 1788 joined 182 new members elected by regional diets in November 1790. Finally, there were 359 deputies. But such number of deputies never worked together because at the time of a single deliberations several members of parliament died, and other were promoted to the senate. In total, during the sessions of the Four-Year Sejm died at least 10 members (8 of the first term and second term of The Sejm), and 15 members (14 first term of the Sejm, including deputy of Bielsko J. K. Ossolinski, whose nomination has been not thoroughly explained, and one during second term of the Sejm) were promoted to the senate. Major changes also occurred in the composition of the senate. During the sessions of the Sejm 38 senator’s seats became vacant. 22 senators died, thus 23 senatorial offices became vacant (two ministries, two bishoprics, 8 provinces (voivodeship) and 11 castellanies). 14 senators resigned from offices (a minister, four voivodes and 9 castellans). A sentence of the Sejm court deprived Grand Treasurer of the Crown of the office. Uniate Metropolitan entered Senate but the resolution of Sejm deprived Field Crown Hetman of the office thereby abolishing offices of the field Hetman. During the Four-Year-Sejm King Stanislaw August nominated 57 senators, including 16 people who were promoted within the Senate. Not all senators joined the confederation. It was joined by 148 senators (including 15 senators who were promoted from among Sejm deputies and accession to the Confederation did as deputies) of a total of 191. Total number of persons entitled to join the Confederacy, including king Stanislaw August Poniatowski was 536 (assuming that Mr Ossoliński, deputy of Bielsko and Castellan of Podlasie Ossoliński is one person). 493 people took advantage of this right: Stanislaw August Poniatowski, all deputies and about 77% of senators.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2010, 17, 17; 97-124
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prace Sejmu Ustawodawczego 1919-1922 nad uregulowaniem uposażenia duchownych i służby kościelnej
The Activities of the Legislative Sejm of 1919-1922. Relating to Remuneration for the Clergy and Church Servants
Autorzy:
Balicki, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/38907965.pdf
Data publikacji:
2007
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Sejm Ustawodawczy
Kościół
Legislative Sejm
Church
Opis:
In this article the author presents a number of essential issues concerning the endowment of the Church, which the members of the Legislative Sejm worked on. The argument begins by stating that Church possessions were confiscated illegally by the governments of the occupant states. An important deduction is made that the endowment of the Church was closely related to the hotly debated agrarian reform conducted with reference to ecclesiastical possessions. In his dissertation, the author presents opinions of many members of Parliament who insisted on a bill which would improve the material conditions of the clergy. It is worth noticing, however, that what they had in mind was the poor clergy in the eastern borderlands of the Republic of Poland. On the opposing side, the author mentions the point of view of those who were against maintaining the Church by the State. Also presented are the arguments of the supporters of the State maintenance of Catholic clergy. Their main argument was the fact that clergy has always played a major role in Polish history. Clergymen were described as promoters and advocates of Poland. The author of the text juxtaposes the opposing view of the supporters and adversaries of the bill which would regulate the discussed issues. Having investigated the above problems and analyzing them in the context of various issues, the author presents in a brief outline the material situation of Catholic clergy in the first years of the independence of the Second Republic of Poland. Debates and conclusions from the described issues, as well as the opinions of the Sejm members are also presented in the text.
Źródło:
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL; 2007, 3, 1; 265-280
1896-6365
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 157 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543270.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Sejm oversight
Opis:
The opinion deals with the exercise of parliamentary oversight functions by Sejm committees. It provides an analysis of whether the representatives of State administration might be held responsible for failure to discharge their duties resulting from Article 157 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, Sejm committees have at their disposal the means to enforce only political responsibility. Moreover, as concerns suspension of work on a bill in the event of breach of the obligations specified in Article 157 by the representatives of public administration, the author believes that the legitimacy of such action cannot be assessed in abstracto. The author does not rule out that, depending on circumstances and seriousness of the infringements, suspension of work on a bill may be justified.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 121-124
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zgłoszenia wniosku o odwołanie członka prezydium komisji przez posła niebędącego członkiem komisji
Legal opinion on the admissibility of making a motion to recall a member of a committee presidium by a Deputy who is not a member of the committee
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11868274.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Deputy to the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion addresses the question of autonomy of a Sejm committee in the situation when a Deputy who is not its member – exercising his/her right to take part in a committee meeting and making motions – puts a motion to recall a member of the presidium (bureau) of that committee. The author gives her opinion, based on her own interpretation of the provisions of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, that such motion should be considered admissible, since there is no legal basis that would make that motion illegitimate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 181-184
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Geneza i skutki dekonstytucjonalizacji Prezydium Sejmu - próba oceny
Autorzy:
Koksanowicz, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1041675.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Fundacja Niepodległości
Tematy:
sejm
prezydium sejmu
marszałek sejmu
organy kierownicze sejmu
presidium of the sejm
marshal of the sejm
governing bodies of the sejm
Opis:
The entry into force of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 meant the Presidium of the Sejm losing its status of a constitutional body. The justification for adopting such a solution was the conviction of the Constitution creators that there is no need to include in it the contents which lie within the autonomy of the Parliament and which may be regulated in the rules and regulations of the Sejm. However, the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium of the Sejm gave rise to some doubts when it comes to the interpretation of the constitutional provisions regulating the status of the Marshal of the Sejm. It also fundamentally influenced the process of directing the work of the Sejm. Therefore, it was a significant change in relation to the previous legal status; however, the importance of the said change (in my opinion) was not fully noticed. One of the effects of the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium was a change in the model of directing the work of the Sejm. A single-person model was introduced in place of the previous collegial manner of decision-making, and as a result the Marshal of the Sejm became the main governing body of the Chamber. After the lapse of over twenty years of adopting such solutions the author is inclined to make an attempt of the assessment of their functioning in the Polish political realities.
Źródło:
Prawo i Polityka; 2018, 8; 37-45
2080-5799
Pojawia się w:
Prawo i Polityka
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 175 regulaminu Sejmu – według pytań szczegółowych
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 175 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – the specific questions
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6583387.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Marshal (Speaker) of the Sejm
Deputy
sitting of the Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion concerns the decision of the Marshal of the Sejm to expel a Deputy from a sitting, taken pursuant to Article. 175 para. 5 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. In the author’s view, such decision is not final, as the Presidium of the Sejm may quash it, having considered an appeal submitted by the Deputy and – on the other hand – is immediately applicable, because the expelled Deputy is obliged to leave the Chamber and abstain from participating in further deliberations until his/her appeal is considered (or until the end of the session of the Sejm, if the Deputy has not submitted an appeal). Therefore, the expelled member does not have the right to participate in voting. Preventing the Deputy expelled from the sitting from “entering the Chamber with the purpose of voting” is necessary in order to respect Article 176 para. 6 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 206-210
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stosowanie przepisów Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego przez Sejm i jego organy
Application of provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure by the Sejm and its organs
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215772.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Code of Administrative Procedure
committee of the Sejm
Sejm
Opis:
The Sejm, as a body of legislative power, is not a public administration body within the meaning of the Code of Administrative Procedure. Thus there is no obligation to apply the provisions of this act. The Sejm committees, which are internal organs of the chamber, also have no obligation to do so. They cannot be a party to proceedings before an administrative court. The Code of Administrative Procedure provides for the possibility of referring a complaint to the Sejm or its internal body (committee), but there are no legal provisions regulating the procedure of examining complaints against state authorities other than executive organs.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 56-62
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Around the Issue of Convening Meetings of the Sejm
Wokół problematyki zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu
Autorzy:
Pastuszko, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/940697.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
convening meetings of the Sejm Marshal of the Sejm
the Sejm
zwoływanie posiedzeń Sejmu Marszałek Sejmu
Sejm
Opis:
This article provides an analysis of selected problems regarding the mechanism for convening sessions of the Sejm by its Marshal. The author criticizes the adopted legal solutions, first of all paying attention to the excessive strengthening of the role of the chair- man of the first chamber of parliament in this respect. In his opinion, doubts must be raised by the fact that under the regulations, the right to convene meetings of the Sejm has got only the Marshal, whereas such entities such like parliamentary factions, as well as the President and the government, are formally deprived of it. In addition, he also shows the dilemmas that may arise in the course of applying those provisions in systemic practice. M. in here, he indicates the problem of setting dates of a sitting of the Sejm, inviting guests and the situation when a sitting cannot be convened for objective reasons.
Niniejszy artykuł zawiera analizę wybranych zagadnień związanych z problematyką zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu przez jego Marszałka. Autor krytykuje w nim przyjęte rozwiązania prawne, zwracając uwagę przede wszystkim na nadmierne wzmocnienie w tym zakresie roli przewodniczącego pierwszej izby parlamentu. Jego zdaniem wątpliwości musi budzić fakt, że na gruncie postanowień regulaminowych prawo do skutecznego zwoływania posiedzeń Sejmu ma jedynie Marszałek, a nie dysponują nim podmioty takie jak frakcje parlamentarne, a także Prezydent i rząd. Obok tego wskazuje on również na dylematy jakie mogą się pojawić w toku stosowania rzeczonych przepisów w praktyce ustrojowej. Sygnalizuje on m. in. tutaj problem ustalania terminu posiedzenia Sejmu, zapraszania gości oraz sytuacji, gdy posiedzenie nie może zostać zwołane z przyczyn obiektywnych.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2019, 5 (51); 83-95
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 862

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies