Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Charter of Fundamental Rights," wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Uzupełnienie opinii o stanowisku rządu RP wobec projektu rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady ustanawiającego na lata 2014–2020 program „Prawa i obywatelstwo” [KOM(2011) 758 wersja ostateczna] oraz określenie relacji między tym dokumentem a Kartą praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej
Addendum to the opinion concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Rights and Citizenship Programme (COM (2011) 758 final) on legal relationship between a regulation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (“Charter”)
Autorzy:
Łacny, Justyna
Sakowicz, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16642542.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
fundamental rights
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Opis:
The opinion comments on the draft position of Poland concerning a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Rights and Citizenship Programme (COM (2011) 758 final). It also clarifies the legal relationship between a regulation (Article 288 (2) Treaty on functioning of the European Union) and the Charter as explained in the latest case-law of the European Court of Justice.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 2(34); 83-91
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konsekwencje prawne Protokołu nr 30 w sprawie stosowania Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej do Polski i Zjednoczonego Królestwa
Legal consequences of Protocol (No 30) on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom
Autorzy:
Jaśkowski, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11882686.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Charter of Fundamental Rights
human rights (fundamental rights)
European Union
Opis:
The article examines the legal consequences of Protocol (No 30) on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom. The author notes that the Charter does not merely confirm the fundamental rights previously recognized in EU law, but also introduces new ones. In the light of this statement it is proposed, that – according to article 1(1) of the Protocol – the Charter does not extend the ability of given courts to examine the compliance of laws and practices of Poland and the UK with the Charter, as far as it introduces these new rights. Article 1(2) of the Protocol excludes the possibility of litigation based on provisions of title IV of the Charter. Article 2 of the Protocol aims at preventing the EU from imposing changes of national laws and practices in certain areas. In the light of provisions of the Charter (particularly article 52(6)) it is however doubtful, whether article 2 constitutes any genuine modification of legal obligations. Finally, the author notes, that according to the predominant view it would be theoretically possible for the Court of Justice of the EU to diminish or even deprive the Protocol of actual practical consequences by making use of general principles of EU law. This however might be regarded as a circumvention of primary EU law and as such deserves negative opinion.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 4(40); 29-50
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ewolucja pojęcia małżeństwa w prawie europejskim
The Evolution of the Concept of Marriage in European Law
Autorzy:
Szewczyk, Roman
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/512323.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum
Tematy:
marriage
family
redefinition
European Union
Charter of Fundamental Rights
Opis:
The path to changing the concept of marriage led through a change in the understanding of the family. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights was intended to cover cases in which national legislation recognizes other possibilities of family formation than marriage. Thus, the entry in the Charter has been shaped in such a way as to avoid a clear response to the new issue of same-sex relationships; that is, it neither permits nor prohibits because of trends based on social movements. This does not affect the institution of marriage itself, but allows the recognition of other forms of family found in the internal regulations of the states as corresponding to marriage.
Źródło:
Studia Ełckie; 2019, 21, 4; 567-581
1896-6896
2353-1274
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ełckie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aksjologia, idee i zasady ogólne Karty Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej
Autorzy:
Cymerys, Kazimierz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2141224.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Tematy:
axiology
general principles of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
Opis:
The Charter of Fundamental Rights represents a new approach of the European Union to protection of human rights. Originally presented in the summit in Nice (2000), the Charter received a legally binding character upon the Treaty of Lisbon (entered into force in 1 December 2009). In the time of Treaties of Rome (1957) the human rights was considered as an area of special interest of the Council of Europe, while EEC has been concentrated on economic and social issues. CoE has offered a fundamental instrument in this area: the European Convention on Human Rights and organized the system of protection basically upon activity of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. During the development of the process of European integration, European Community has been more and more involved in the area of protection of fundamental rights. A breaking point was the establishment of the European Union (Treaty of Maastricht), when the EU decides to extend the rights of their citizens. The author presents a genesis of Charter of Fundamental Rights and analyses basic ideas and axiological system of this document. He concentrates on such a rights as “right to life” and “right to dignity”. He offers an analysis of cultural pluralism which was crucial during the formulation of particular rights. He especially stresses meaning of new types of rights, as the right to good administration. It will be interesting to see an interrelation between the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Theoretically we do not have a collision in this area, once rights known under the European Convention of Human Rights should be interpreted according to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. It practice it may occur tensions between two courts during the process of interpretation of the rights. It will create new type of relations between the Council of Europe and European Union, once EU wants to be active in all areas of public interest and the original division of an areas of interest between the European international organizations is not actual.
Źródło:
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2011, 2(7); 385-398
1898-8431
Pojawia się w:
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by Polish Courts and the Jurisprudence of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal
Autorzy:
Kowalik-Bańczyk, Krystyna
Wróblewski, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/419609.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
Tematy:
Charter of Fundamental Rights
Polish Constitutional Tribunal,
Common courts
Opis:
This text presents the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by Polish courts since the entry into force of the Charter in December 2009. As the Charter is an element of the ‘external’ constitution for the Republic of Poland, similar to the European Convention on Human Rights, the practice of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal is of particular importance in this analysis. Hence the referral to the Charter by common and administrative courts is rather briefl y described and the main focus of the text is on the broader analysis of the way of and reasons for using the Charter by the Constitutional Tribunal. While the Charter is not treated as a model for the hierarchical analysis of norms in cases of constitutional complaints, it can however be offered as such a model in cases of abstract control and legal questions fi led by the courts. The use of the Charter might be further clarifi ed by an answer of the Court of Justice of the European Union to the fi rst request for preliminary ruling made by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in case C-390/15 RPO.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Polish European Studies; 2015, 18; 239-266
1428-1503
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Polish European Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Powaga rzeczy osądzonej – uwagi na tle wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE w sprawie Zorana Spasica
Res judicata – The remarks on the Court of Justice of the EU judgment on Zoran Spasic case
Autorzy:
Michalak, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2223671.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
res judicata
cross-border prosecutions
Schengen zone
Charter of Fundamental Rights
Opis:
The significance of the ne bis in idem principle is determined by its essence. In view of enhanced international cooperation this principle acquires a new meaning and the scope of its validity becomes redefined. EU Court of Justice referred to the ne bis principle – inter alia – on Zoran Spasic case. The author of this paper presents the most unconventional aspects of that important judgment. The Court found that reasons of safety and widely understood efficiency of functioning of cross-border prosecutions is more vital than understanding of the res judicata principle established in the literature.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 2(46); 21-36
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Protection of Social Rights as a Permament Challenge for the European Union
Autorzy:
Ryszka, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1597388.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-08-21
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Charter of Fundamental Rights, Social Pillar, social rights, European Labour Authority, Social Scoreboard
Opis:
Social rights protection in the European Union has undergone significant development. Currently their protection is regulated by relevant treaty provisions and the Charter of Fundamental Rights (Charter), both of a primary law nature, as well as by the non-binding European Pillar of Social Rights (Pillar). The aim of the paper is the assessment of the social rights protection in the EU, and whether all social rights provided in the CFR have their counterparts in the EPSR, hence whether and in what way the EPSR assists the actual exercise of social rights provided by the CFR. Comparing the content of the above-mentioned legal instruments makes it possible to answer the question whether all social rights provided in the Charter have their counterparts in the Pillar. This can help determine whether the latter affects the implementation of the former. If the answer is in the affirmative, it can further allow for determining in what way the principles of the Pillar assist in the actual exercise of social rights provided by the Charter. This is very important taking into account the need for an ongoing response to unforeseen threats, like for example COVID-19. The social aspects of EU integration thus are and will remain a subject of interest in the nearest future.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2021, 46, 3; 109-143
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zasada godności ludzkiej w unijnym prawie pierwotnym i prawie pochodnym obejmującym przestrzeń wolności, bezpieczeństwa i sprawiedliwości
The principle of human dignity in the primary and AFSJ secondary legislation of the European Union
Autorzy:
Kołatek, Radosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2211874.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
human dignity
fundamental rights
Charter of Fundamental Rights
individual
justice and home affairs (JHA)
Opis:
This article presents the normative status of the principle of human dignity in the law of the European Union. The issue is portrayed with reference to primary and secondary legislation of the EU. The first field of analysis was the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights as primary sources of EU law. The examination of secondary law in the form of regulations, directives as well as soft law used to implement the policies regarding the area of freedom, security and justice was the subsequent stage. Having explored this, it was possible to formulate the thesis of this paper. It is believed that human dignity – as a principle of EU law – is a legally binding rule not only for the Member States but also for the third countries applying for EU membership. Human dignity is also one of the indivisible and universal values on which the European Union is founded.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 2(58); 29-44
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Protection of Personal Data of Crime Victims in European Union Law – Latest Developments
Autorzy:
Grzelak, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706816.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
personal data protection
police directive
victim of crime
Charter of Fundamental Rights
Opis:
In EU law a lot of attention has recently been paid to personal data protection standards. In parallel to the development of the general EU rules on data protection, the Members States also develop cooperation between law enforcement agencies and create new information exchange possibilities, including the processing of personal data of participants in criminal proceedings. The aim of this article is to analyse whether the personal data of victims of crime are safeguarded according to the standards of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. For this purpose, the author analyses two directives: 2012/29/EU, which regulates minimum standards of victims of crime; and 2016/680/EU (also known as the Law Enforcement Directive), which regulates personal data processing for the purpose of combating crime. Based on the example of the Polish legislation implementing both directives, the author comes to the conclusion that the EU legislation is not fully coherent and leaves too much margin of appreciation to the national legislator. This results in a failure to achieve the basic goals of both directives. The author expects the necessary reflection not only from the national legislator, but also from the European Commission, which should check the correctness of the implementation of the directives, as well as from national courts, which should use all possible measures to ensure that the national law is interpreted in the light of the objectives of the directives.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 209-228
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Protection of Fundamental Rights Source: Polish Yearbook of International Law
Autorzy:
Lenaerts, Koen
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706612.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Charter of Fundamental Rights
European Union
Treaty of Lisbon
European Convention on Human Rights
ECHR
Opis:
The present contribution looks at the protection of fundamental rights under EU law, paying special attention to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) which, since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, enjoys “the same legal value as the Treaties”. First, by looking at the recent case law of the European Court of Justice, it explores the scope of application of the Charter. Second, it examines the conditions that the limitations on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter must fulfil in order to be valid. Third, it looks at the interaction between, on the one hand, the Charter and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and between, on the other hand, the Charter and the constitutional traditions common to the Member States. Finally, a brief conclusion contains some remarks as to the requirements private applicants must fulfil in order to build strategic human rights cases successfully.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2011, 31; 79-106
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
EU Values and Constitutional Pluralism: The EU System of Fundamental Rights Protection
Autorzy:
Lenaerts, Koen
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706658.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Charter of Fundamental Rights
CJEU
Court of Justice of the European Union
EU
European Union
fundamental right
Opis:
This article seeks to explore whether the EU system of fundamental rights protection allows room for constitutional pluralism. By looking at recent developments in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court of Justice), it is submitted that the Court has answered that question in the affirmative, thereby respecting the diversity of the cultures and traditions of the peoples of Europe as well as their national identities. The application of the Charter does not rule out a cumulative application of fundamental rights. That being said, pluralism is not absolute, but must be weighed against the indivisible and universal values on which the European Union is founded. Logically, the question that arises is how we order pluralism. In this regard, I shall argue that it is not for the Court of Justice to decide when an EU uniform standard of fundamental rights protection is to replace (or coexist with) national standards. That decision is for the EU political institutions to adopt, since they enjoy the necessary democratic legitimacy to determine the circumstances under which the exercise of a fundamental right is to be limited for reasons of public interest. However, this deference to the EU political branches does not mean that EU legislative decisions are immune from judicial review. On the contrary, cases such as Schwarz and Digital Rights demonstrate that the Court of Justice is firmly committed to examining whether those legislative choices comply with primary EU law, and notably with the Charter. In this regard, when interpreting the provisions of the Charter, the Court of Justice – in dialogue with national courts and, in particular, constitutional courts – operates as the guarantor of the rule of law within the EU, of which fundamental rights are part and parcel. It is thus for those courts to make sure that each and every EU citizen enjoys a sphere of individual liberty which must, as defined by the Charter, remain free from public interferences.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 135-160
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Amendment to the rights and obligations of a journalist in act: press law from the perspective of conscience clause
Autorzy:
Sobczak, Jacek
Golda-Sobczak, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206913.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-06-26
Wydawca:
Uczelnia Łazarskiego. Oficyna Wydawnicza
Tematy:
conscience clause
Press Law
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
journalist
diligence and integrity in journalistic work
Opis:
The conscience clause, sometimes also referred to as the right to conscientious objection, is based on the possibility of refusing to comply with a binding legal norm due to its non-conformity with the indications of conscience of the person who invokes its content. Commonly derived, especially in Poland, from Article 53 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, this clause initially applied to physicians’ actions. It was also suggested that this clause could form the basis for conscientious objection to an abortion procedure. Drawing on Article 10(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and emphasising the differences in the wording of this provision in different language versions, the article argues that such interpretation of the conscience clause is too narrow and poor. Attention is drawn to the amendments made to the wording of Article 10(2) of the Press Law, where the legislator replaced the journalist’s obligation to follow the editorial policy with the right to refuse to carry out an official order if the journalist believed that they were expected to publish a material that would violate the principles of reliability, objectivity and professional diligence. This solution undoubtedly constitutes the approval of the broadly understood conscience clause explicitly formulated in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The content of Article 10(2) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights allows for conscientious objection to apply to actions of the representatives across all professions.
Źródło:
Ius Novum; 2023, 17, 3 ENG; 95-116
1897-5577
Pojawia się w:
Ius Novum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
An approach to the translation of deontic modality in legal texts. The case of the Polish and English versions of the “Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union”
Autorzy:
Jaskot, Maciej Paweł
Wiltos, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/677009.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Slawistyki PAN
Tematy:
deontic modality
confrontation of languages
legal multilingualism
legal translation
modal functor
European Union
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Opis:
An approach to the translation of deontic modality in legal texts. The case of the Polish and English versions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European UnionThe co-existence of twenty-four legal languages in the European Union is guaranteed by the basic principles of EU language policy, stated in its founding treaty. Indeed, every EU citizen has the right to communicate with the EU in the official language of their choice, and to receive a reply in the same language. Such a situation is reflected in legal multilingualism, which presents challenges for both linguists and translators.One of these challenges is the translation of deontic modality. This article focuses on how deontic modality is expressed in the Polish and English versions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The form and usage of modal forms which express deontic possibility (i.e. permission) and deontic necessity (i.e. obligation) are highlighted, as well as the similarities and differences between the two parallel texts. The differences between the modal forms in the two versions of the text have consequences regarding the degree of both the subject’s and addressee’s commitment to norms and regulations.This article aspires to contribute to the study of deontic modal language, which is considered to be one of the central linguistic phenomena most in need of explanation. Tłumaczenie modalności deontycznej w tekstach prawnych na przykładzie polsko- i anglojęzycznej wersji Karty praw podstawowych Unii EuropejskiejWspółistnienie dwudziestu czterech języków oficjalnych Unii Europejskiej gwarantowane jest przez podstawowe zasady przyjętej przez nią polityki językowej, których podstawy zawarte są w traktatach założycielskich. W ich wyniku każdy obywatel UE ma prawo nie tylko do komunikowania się z organami UE w wybranym przez siebie języku urzędowym oraz do otrzymania odpowiedzi w tymże języku, ale również do tego, aby całe prawo Unii Europejskiej tworzone było we wszystkich 24 językach urzędowych. Wspomniane założenia stanowią jednak ogromne wyzwanie zarówno dla tłumaczy, jak i lingwistów.Teksty prawne składające się na system prawa Unii Europejskiej, sporządzone w 24 językach urzędowych UE, zawierają w sobie wypowiedzi, których immanentną cechą jest modalność. Jednakowe wyrażenie wspomnianego elementu modalnego wydaje się jednak szczególnie trudne w procesie redagowania wielojęzycznych tekstów prawnych.Niniejszy artykuł poświęcony jest zagadnieniu sposobu wyrażania modalności deontycznej w polskiej i angielskiej wersji Karty Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej. Przeprowadzone badanie pozwoliło na wyodrębnienie poszczególnych form językowych będących nośnikiem odpowiednio możliwości (dozwolenie) oraz konieczności (nakaz i zakaz) deontycznej. Wykazane zostały ponadto zaobserwowane różnice i podobieństwa pomiędzy dwoma równoległymi wersjami językowymi wspomnianego dokumentu. Na uwagę zasługują zwłaszcza te ostatnie ze względu na ich potencjalne konsekwencje wynikające z różnego stopnia zobowiązania się zarówno podmiotu, jak i adresata dokumentu do przestrzegania wynikających z niego norm.Celem artykułu jest przyczynienie się do rozszerzenia badań nad środkami wyrażania modalności deontycznej, stanowiącymi jedno z głównych zagadnień lingwistycznych wymagających głębszej analizy i opisu.
Źródło:
Cognitive Studies; 2017, 17
2392-2397
Pojawia się w:
Cognitive Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Standardy praw człowieka w Unii Europejskiej
Standards of human rights in the European Union
Autorzy:
Kania, Agnieszka Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158801.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
standardy praw człowieka
Karta praw podstawowych UE
wspołpraca UE
standards of human rights
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
EU cooperation
Opis:
Prawa podstawowe w systemie prawnym Unii Europejskiej zostały podniesione do rangi źródeł prawa pierwotnego. Uznano w ten sposób znaczenie ochrony praw człowieka dla rozwoju wspólnoty europejskiej. W obecnej sytuacji społeczno-politycznej wydaje się pożądane przypomnienie i usystematyzowanie standardów praw człowieka, które swój szczególny wydźwięk zyskały po wejściu w życie Karty praw podstawowych UE. Artykuł prezentuje podział na standardy nadrzędne i osiem standardów podrzędnych praw człowieka.
Fundamental rights in the European Union legislation have been elevated to the source of EU primary law. Two decades ago, it was recognized the importance of cooperation in the field of human rights protection for the development of the EU. In the present socio-political situation, it seems desirable to recall and systematize the standards of human rights, which gained special resonance after coming into force the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. This article presents the eight standards of human rights.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały; 2022, (31), 2; 105-116
1689-8052
2451-0807
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
EXTREME MATERIAL POVERTY AS A NEGATIVE PREREQUISITE FOR THE TRANSFER OF AN APPLICANT FOR INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION TO THE COMPETENT MEMBER STATE AND FOR THE REJECTION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF REFUGEE STATUS AS BEING INADMISSIBLE
Autorzy:
Wróbel, Izabela Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/784231.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
EU asylum law, Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, Directive 2013/32/EU, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, extreme material poverty
Opis:
             The essential measures for a common European asylum system adopted by the EU institutions include the Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 and the Directive 2013/32/EU. These acts relate to the various stages of the functioning of the common European asylum system, however, there may be a risk of a violation of the fundamental rights of applicants as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, including the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment (Article 4 of the Charter), at both stages. Such a risk may arise as a result of deficiencies in asylum systems of the Member States. If these deficiencies are to fall within the scope of Article 4 of the Charter, they must attain a particularly high level of severity, which depends on all the circumstances of the case. An example of attaining this particularly high level of severity is the situation of extreme material poverty. As acts of the EU asylum law do not contain the terms “particularly high level of severity” and “extreme material poverty” and all the more they do not define them, guidelines on how to interpret and apply Article 4 of the Charter in the context of the common European asylum system should be sought in the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. Therefore, the aim of the article is to explore and attempt to generalise and develop the basis and the criteria indicated by the CJEU for assessing the actual nature of deficiencies in the asylum system of the Member State in question from the point of view of the prohibition laid down in Article 4 of the Charter, with particular emphasis on the criterion of a particularly high level of severity and the situation of extreme material poverty which meets this criterion.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2019, 37, 2; 139-161
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies