Autor: Jan, Olaszek, - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Jan Walc – Od kultury oficjalnej do kultury niezależnej
Autorzy:: Jan, Olaszek,
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902337.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019-11-13
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:: Jan Walc
independent culture
samizdat
democratic opposition in the People’s Republic of Poland
kultura niezależna
drugi obieg wydawniczy
opozycja demokratyczna w PRL
Opis:: Jan Walc was a character with rich achievements, and at the same time colorful and interesting. He was a critic who writes about Tadeusz Konwicki and Adam Mickiewicz, secretary of Jaroslaw Iwaszkiewicz ordering his archives and at the same time one of the most severe critics of his attitude, teacher, a co-worker of weeklies “Polityka” and “Kultura”, and finally – a longtime activist of the democratic opposition and a leading publicist and printer of the second circulation in the PRL. The above calculation itself shows the originality of this character, today almost completely forgotten. In his texts he critisised party activists, militiamen, prosecutors, luminaries of Polish literature, democratic opposition leaders, former and current colleagues, and even his daughter’s teachers. In the talk I will want to show the Jan Walc’s way to participate in independent publishing movement and his role in this phenomenon.
Źródło:: Studia Interkulturowe Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej; 2019, 12; 156-169
1898-4215
Pojawia się w:: Studia Interkulturowe Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: „Ekstremiści, chuligani, politykierzy”. Obraz podziemnej „Solidarności” w propagandzie stanu wojennego
‘Extremists, Hooligans, Politicos’. Representations of Underground ‘Solidarność’ in the Martial Law Propaganda
Autorzy:: Olaszek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477716.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2010
Wydawca:: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Opis:: Polish authorities not only arrested hiding activists of the underground „Solidarity” („Solidarność”) movement but also made an effort to discredit them in society’s eyes. The official press emphasized the weakness of the opposition simultaneously exaggerating threats connected with its functioning. Besides, the „extremists” – as the underground’s leaders were called – were presented as those, who aimed for a confrontation with the authorities in order to take over the leadership of the country. What is more, the opposition was accused of betraying Poland and of going over to the PRL’s overseas enemies. An alleged “Solidarity’s” dependence on those countries was supposed to result from financial support for its activity received from western governments and secret services. In addition to that, “Solidarity’s” members were reproached for popularizing terrorist methods of fighting with the authorities as well as for exploiting patriotic symbols. Polish media were trying to prove that street demonstrations were principal methods of mounting active resistance to the communist government and its politics. Those events were presented in a way that only exposed a rowdy behaviour of the crowds, whereas aggressive actions taken by public law and order services were well hidden. On the other hand, particular strikes organized by the underground were being, as far as possible, ignored, because their existence was in opposition to the image created by a socialist propaganda, according to which the “working class” did not support the opposition. Furthermore, the authorities sought to marginalise a phenomenon of an underground literature by deriding its – alleged – poor essential content and low technical quality. It is difficult to state how far Poles believed in the “enemy’s” image created by the media. Presumably, an “anti-Solidarity” propaganda yielded the best results in small towns and in the country. Simultaneously, there were some social groups such as young people of intelligentsia backgrounds and urbanized “working class” which might have been resistant to its influence. Common stereotypes about the “Solidarity’s” leaders were perpetuated among pro-communist communities and also among some representatives of ruling elites. It resulted in expressing their anxiety at participation of particular opposition’s members in the Polish Round Table Talks.
Źródło:: Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2010, 2(16); 105-137
1427-7476
Pojawia się w:: Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: [Recenzje] Wokół pracy Pawła Sowińskiego Zakazana książka. Uczestnicy drugiego obiegu 1977–1989, Instytut Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Warszawa 2011, 367 ss.
Autorzy:: Olaszek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477791.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2012
Wydawca:: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Źródło:: Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2012, 1(19); 559-581
1427-7476
Pojawia się w:: Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Dwie próby rozliczenia się środowiska literackiego ze stalinizmem
Autorzy:: Olaszek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/689910.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:: Październik 1956
Solidarność
stalinizm
literaci w PRL
October 1956
“Solidarity”
Stalinism
writers in the Polish People’s Republic
Opis:: W artykule zestawione zostały dwie książki, będące próbą rozliczenia się polskiego środowiska literackiego ze stalinizmem: Rachunek pamięci pod redakcją Władysława Bieńkowskiego, Heleny Boguszewskiej, Pawła Jasienicy i Jerzego Kornackiego oraz Hańba domowa Jacka Trznadla. W tekście przedstawiono okoliczności powstania obu prac i ich recepcję. Przeanalizowano zamieszczone w nich wypowiedzi pisarzy pod kątem oceny literatury w czasach stalinowskich i ówczesnej atmosfery w środowisku literackim, stosunku do rozliczenia oraz czynników, które decydowały o poparciu dużej części środowiska dla ustroju komunistycznego w tym okresie.
The article compares two books being an attempt of the Polish literary community to settle with Stalinism: Rachunek pamięci (An Examination of Remembrance) under the joint scientific editorship of Władysław Bieńkowski, Helena Boguszewska, Paweł Jasienica, and Jerzy Kornacki; and Jacek Trznadel’s Hańba domowa (Home Disgrace). The study presents the circumstances of the creation of these two books and their reception, together with an analysis of the statements and opinions of writers contained in the text in terms of assessing literature in Stalinist times and the atmosphere in the literary milieu at the time, their attitude to settling accounts with the past and to the factors that determined the support of a large part of the community for the communist system in the period.
Źródło:: Polska 1944/45-1989. Studia i Materiały; 2019, 17
2450-8365
Pojawia się w:: Polska 1944/45-1989. Studia i Materiały
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Underground Publishing, Samizdat and Central Europe
Autorzy:: Olaszek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/953690.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:: PRL
Czechoslovakia
samizdat
underground circulation network
Central Europe
Central and Eastern Europe
Opis:: The review article deals with participation of independent media in the debate on the notion of Central-Eastern Europe in Czechoslovakia and Poland. Participants of this debate (Polish, Czech and Slovak writers, intellectuals and journalists) symbolically neutralized the cold-war division of the world (iron curtain) and liquidated barriers between socialist countries being the parts of the Soviet empire.
Źródło:: Kwartalnik Historyczny; 2019, 126, 3
0023-5903
Pojawia się w:: Kwartalnik Historyczny
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: „Nieliczni ekstremiści”. Podziemna Solidarność w propagandzie stanu wojennego
Autorzy:: Olaszek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/books/1377791.epub
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/books/1377791.mobi
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/books/1377791.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2010
Wydawca:: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności
Opis:: Książka ukazuje propagandowy obraz podziemnej Solidarności tworzony przez władze. Autor ukazuje, w jaki sposób próbowano zdyskredytować „wroga” za pomocą kłamliwej i napastliwej kampanii propagandowej z wykorzystaniem wszelkich dostępnych środków – radia, telewizji i prasy.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Książka

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Marzec ’68 w publikacjach drugiego obiegu w PRL
Autorzy:: Olaszek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1198085.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2018
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:: independent publishing movement
March ’68
student rebellion
democratic opposition
anti-Semitism in the Polish People’s Republic
niezależny ruch wydawniczy
Marzec ’68
bunt studencki
opozycja demokratyczna
antysemityzm w PRL
Opis:: W artykule przeanalizowana została obecność wątków związanych z Marcem ’68 w publikacjach drugiego obiegu wydawniczego. Wskazałem w nim na najważniejsze książki, broszury i numery czasopism, które ukazały się w PRL poza cenzurą i dotyczyły tego „polskiego miesiąca”. Wyróżniłem trzy momenty intensyfikacji debat na ten temat na łamach niezależnych publikacji oraz przeanalizowałem kilka wybranych wątków dotyczących Marca, które były przedmiotem sporów i zróżnicowanych ocen.
The article presents an analysis of topics related to March ’69 in Samizdat texts. I have indicated the most important books, pamphlets, and volumes of periodicals that appeared in the Polish People’s Republic outside censorship control and were related to the subject of the Polish March 1968. I have included, among others, books by Jakub Karpiński, Anna Mieszczanek, Anna Siwek, Paul Lendvai, and two special issues of the periodical Krytyka (Criticism). I have distinguished three moments when the debates on the subject in clandestine publications intensified. The first one took place on the tenth anniversary of March, when oppositionists had an opportunity to debate on the subject for the first time. The second one was in 1981, when the “Solidarity” organised a special celebration of the thirteenth anniversary of March. The third one – in 1988 – was a response to the attempted change of narratives about the March undertook by the state authorities. I have analysed several selected topics of March which were the subject of disputes and different opinions: the question of possible provocation that sparked protests, the problem of reaction of Polish people to the antiSemitic propaganda and the policy of the authorities in general, the question of Leftist orientation of the protest participants and the problem of recapitulation of March ’68.
Źródło:: Polska 1944/45-1989. Studia i Materiały; 2018, 16; 165-201
2450-8365
Pojawia się w:: Polska 1944/45-1989. Studia i Materiały
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Konstanty Gebert – redaktor i publicysta prasy podziemnej
Konstanty Gebert – Editor and Publicist of the Underground Press
Autorzy:: Olaszek, Jan
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477582.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2014
Wydawca:: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
Tematy:: prasa podziemna, opozycja w PRL, Konstanty Gebert, drugi obieg
wydawniczy, podziemny dwutygodnik „KOS”
Opis:: This article discusses the activities of Konstanty Gebert – an editor and publicist of the underground press in the years 1982–1989. In the 1970s, he cooperated with the Workers’ Defence Committee and continued his activity during the ‘Solidarity’ period. Shortly after the introduction of martial law, Gebert became a member of the editorial team of ‘KOS’ – one of the most important underground periodicals. He soon became one of the key figures in that community. He performed editing and typesetting, but was really in his element when writing articles for the press. He wrote articles for ‘KOS’ and other underground periodicals. With time, his pseudonym ‘Dawid Warszawski’ became a well-known brand in the underground press. Gebert was initially in favour of creating an Underground State, similar to the one existing during the Second World War. However, his views on the organization of the underground movement gradually evolved. In 1983, he suggested establishing an ‘independent socjety.’ Even though he was connected with the moderate stream of the ‘Solidarity’ Movement, he was far from being conciliatory. His views changed partly as a result of the policy of the authorities after 1986, when most prisoners were released. He came to the conclusion that the situation was stalemate. He thought that a compromise was possible – due to the economic crisis and changes in the USSR – but not at any price. He was passionately interested in international politics. In underground publications, such issues were only mentioned in connection with the ‘Eastern bloc’ and the USA. ‘Dawid Warszawski,’ however, was also interested in the Middle East and China. He was sometimes fairly critical about the USA and its non-democratic allies. Observing the life of Konstanty Gebert, one may notice certain dilemmas. In his opposition activities, he was always looking for a balance between the aim of making the underground press as attractive as possible for the reader, and that of subordinating it to the objectives of the social opposition movement. Gebert’s biography also shows how important the experience of co-creating the underground press was in the development of the journalistic elites of the Third Republic of Poland.
Źródło:: Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2014, 2(24); 191-226
1427-7476
Pojawia się w:: Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki