Tytuł pozycji:
Introspection - One or More? Pluralism about Self-Knowledge
- Tytuł:
-
Introspection - One or More? Pluralism about Self-Knowledge
- Autorzy:
-
Komorowska-Mach, Joanna
- Powiązania:
-
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/968702.pdf
- Data publikacji:
-
2019-03-31
- Wydawca:
-
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
- Źródło:
-
Filozofia Nauki; 2019, 27, 1; 5-25
1230-6894
2657-5868
- Język:
-
angielski
- Prawa:
-
CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0
- Dostawca treści:
-
Biblioteka Nauki
-
Przejdź do źródła  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
The aim of this paper is to provide a metaphilosophical analysis of the debate between monistic and pluralistic approaches to self-knowledge. I start by presenting the background for the discussion, clarifying the terminology, and drawing a distinction between moderate and radical pluralism. I then discuss and evaluate arguments for monism that appeal to general methodological guidelines as well as those relying on specific assumptions about the objects and character of self-knowledge. I offer a separate analysis of Eric Schwitzgebel’s radical pluralism, which threatens to undermine both monism and moderate pluralism. I close by describing a way of looking at the problem of the homogeneity of self-knowledge that goes beyond the monism–pluralism dichotomy and arguing that the heterogeneity and multidimensionality of the problem of self-knowledge are more important than the plurality of the solutions.