Tytuł pozycji:
Rola polubownego rozwiązywania sporów w polityce ochrony konsumenta usług bankowych w Polsce w perspektywie pokryzysowej
- Tytuł:
-
Rola polubownego rozwiązywania sporów w polityce ochrony konsumenta usług bankowych w Polsce w perspektywie pokryzysowej
The Role of Amicable Dispute Settlement in Field of Banking Consumer Protection in Post-crisis Poland
- Autorzy:
-
Kil, Krzysztof
- Powiązania:
-
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/904858.pdf
- Data publikacji:
-
2013
- Wydawca:
-
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
- Źródło:
-
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica; 2013, 284
0208-6018
2353-7663
- Język:
-
polski
- Prawa:
-
Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone. Swoboda użytkownika ograniczona do ustawowego zakresu dozwolonego użytku
- Dostawca treści:
-
Biblioteka Nauki
-
Przejdź do źródła  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Introduction of alternative ways of solving consumer quarrels to the polish banking reality
has undoubtedly led to increased competiveness of customer available dispute resolution methods.
Time consuming and high initial cost demanding processes available through public judicial
proceedings are no longer the only available ways of market defense for weaker entities. Growing
importance of such options can been observed within last few years, and the greatest contribution
can be assigned to the meditations of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Observed in 2008
appointment of Court of Arbitration, acting together in terms on supervision of financial market
can be viewed as a sign of needed expansion of ADR’s responsibilities. The settlement of those
bodies under the supervision of FSA (KNB) or Polish Bank Association (ZBP) remains as a major
drawback. Despite the many positive signals of the importance of solving disputes outside of the
system of public justice, objective evaluation requires underlining of many shortcomings.
A relatively small number of reported cases arising from the lack of knowledge of consumers is
worth mentioning. Informational obligations and the need for increased consumer awareness of the
existence of an alternative to the lengthy and costly trial solutions should become a priority for
public authorities. In addition, the possibility of using those alternative instruments by consumers
is limited, for example by introduction of limits on disputes available through arbitration. In time
horizon appointment of Consumer Arbitration, for which the project of the Financial Supervision
Commission calls for, seems to be an important issue. Another important point may be
a simplification of the procedures for the settlement of disputes, also through the use
of digitization, which is a priority of the European Parliament and Council for the next period
in the ODR in the field of consumer protection.