Rozstrzygnięcia sądowe w przedmiocie wniosku oskarżyciela publicznego o zobowiązanie podmiotu z art. 52 k.k. i art. 24 § 5 k.k.s. do zwrotu korzyści majątkowej uzyskanej z przestępstwa (przestępstwa skarbowego) innej osoby.
Rozstrzygnięcia sądowe w przedmiocie wniosku oskarżyciela publicznego o zobowiązanie podmiotu z art. 52 k.k. i art. 24 § 5 k.k.s. do zwrotu korzyści majątkowej uzyskanej z przestępstwa (przestępstwa skarbowego) innej osoby. The judicial decisions in the object of the public prosecutor’s conclusion about obligation of the subject from article 52 of the Polish Penal Code and article 24, paragraph 4 of the Polish Treasury Penal Code to return of the property advantage achieved with crime (the treasury crime) of different person
To begin with, I raise the question, that on the sixth of June 1997, the legislator
firstly in article 52 introduced to the Polish Penal Code the institution of obligation to
repay the property advantage by a physical person, a juristic one or an organizational unit
without a legal status, for the benefit of the State Treasury. The aforementioned advantage
was achieved by the person in the crime, committed by the delinquent, who acted in behalf
of this person name or interest. The similar regulation is contained in the Polish Treasury
Penal Code from 1999, where article 24, paragraph 5 provides that independently from
putting on auxiliary responsibility, the court will oblige the subject, which achieved property
advantage, to return it in the full or in part for the benefit of the State Treasury or the
territorial self-government unit; it does not relate to the property advantage subjected to
return in full or in part for the benefit of the different subject.
In order to usage of the aforementioned jurisprudential constructions from article 52
of the Polish Penal Code and article 24, paragraph 4 of the Polish Treasury Penal Code in
action penal proceeding (penal treasury proceeding), the public prosecutor should attach an
application in accordance with article 333, paragraph 4 of the Penal Proceeding Code (article
155 paragraph 5 of the Treasury Penal Code) to indictment. In object of this application
the court gives decision of the defined content, conditioned by the proceeding’s situation.
The article under the title “The judicial decisions in the object of the public prosecutor’s
conclusion about obligation of the subject from article 52 of the Polish Penal Code and
article 24, paragraph 4 of the Polish Treasury Penal Code to return of the property advantage
achieved with crime (the treasury crime) of different person” presents the matter in detail.
This article describes in the first order possible judgments of the court of first instance in
the matter. Next, this article refers to the decision of the court of second instance in this
range. It is unquestionable, that the judgments of first instance court in the matter of the
public prosecutor’s conclusion from article 333, paragraph 4 of the Penal Proceeding Code
(article 155 paragraph 5 of the Treasury Penal Code) can be subjected to the review by means
of appeal and in this case it is liable (amenable) to be inspected by the higher instance in
the court of the second instance. The results of this inspection can be different with regard
to that who takes revocation centre (lodges an appeal) and what pleadings and appellate
conclusions he notified. Their discussion occurred in this article from here.
In judicial practice we cannot exclude that, despite validation, the judgment of court
including decision about obligation of the subject from article 52 of the Polish Penal Code
and the article 24 paragraph 4 of the Polish Treasury Penal Code to return of the property
advantage in full or in part for the benefit of the State Treasury (or territorial self-government in Polish Penal Code), will be inconsistent with law. This inconsistency will be detected in
legal proceeding initiated as the result of extraordinary remedies at law.
Therefore this article discusses also the kinds of judicial judgments which were given
just as the result of extraordinary remedies of law. In the article it is necessary to be related
to the results on the basis of the decisions referring to the subject who is obliged to return
of the property advantage achieved in the crime (the treasury crime) by the delinquent.
Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies
Informacja
SZANOWNI CZYTELNICY!
UPRZEJMIE INFORMUJEMY, ŻE BIBLIOTEKA FUNKCJONUJE W NASTĘPUJĄCYCH GODZINACH:
Wypożyczalnia i Czytelnia Główna: poniedziałek – piątek od 9.00 do 19.00