Tytuł pozycji:
Anatomia klęski – obóz władzy w kampanii wyborczej w 1989 roku
- Tytuł:
-
Anatomia klęski – obóz władzy w kampanii wyborczej w 1989 roku
Anatomy of a defeat: The authorities’ camp in the 1989 electoral campaign
- Autorzy:
-
Codogni, Paulina
- Powiązania:
-
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477832.pdf
- Data publikacji:
-
2011
- Wydawca:
-
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
- Źródło:
-
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2011, 2(18); 151-178
1427-7476
- Język:
-
polski
- Prawa:
-
Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone. Swoboda użytkownika ograniczona do ustawowego zakresu dozwolonego użytku
- Dostawca treści:
-
Biblioteka Nauki
-
Przejdź do źródła  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Anatomy of a defeat: The authorities’ camp in the 1989 electoral campaign
As a result of changes in both the internal and external situation of the People’s
Republic of Poland in the second half of the 1980s, Gen. Wojciech Jaruzelski’s
administration felt obliged to negotiate with the opposition. For the authorities,
the key point of the negotiations was the electoral contract on the basis of which
they Solidarity leaders agreed to participate in the still not fully democratic
parliamentary election planned for June 1989.
The present analysis of the authorities’ preparations for the election shows how
many mistakes they made at the central and lower levels. At this early stage, the
key element of those preparations which contributed to the scale of the defeat of
the coalition-government camp was the method of nominating candidate for the
upper and lower house of parliament. The fact that the Political Bureau renounced
the initiative to nominate candidates for both houses of parliament led to
uncontrollable fragmentation and the nomination of candidates by a wide range of
coalitions.
Interestingly, it is clear that the authorities ignored the results of all opinion
polls, which indicated that they were unlikely to win many mandates. Why they
persisted in believing they could win is difficult to explain, but the conviction that
the society would soon tire of the opposition’s campaign and vote for the ruling
camp was certainly one of the reasons.
One of the party’s basic problems at the time was its inability to convince
its members to play an active role in the campaign. Inducing its political allies
cooperate created even greater difficulties. As a result, the coalition was unable to
form a uniform front for the purpose of conducting the electoral campaign.
The next challenge the PUWP had to face during the campaign were the efforts
of allied parties to gain greater autonomy and emphasize their distinctive character.