Tytuł pozycji:
„Język polski jest tak bogaty, giętka jest nasza mowa!” Podstawowa Organizacja Partyjna Oddziału Warszawskiego Związku Literatów Polskich i jej stosunek do polityki kierownictwa partyjnego w latach 1956–1970
- Tytuł:
-
„Język polski jest tak bogaty, giętka jest nasza mowa!” Podstawowa Organizacja Partyjna Oddziału Warszawskiego Związku Literatów Polskich i jej stosunek do polityki kierownictwa partyjnego w latach 1956–1970
“The Polish language is so rich, fl exible is our talk!”. The Basic Party Cell (POP) of the Warsaw Branch (OW) of the Polish Writers’ Association (ZLP) and its attitude towards the policies of PZPR’s (Polish United Workers’ Party’s) leadership in the years 1956–1970
- Autorzy:
-
Rokicki, Konrad
- Powiązania:
-
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/477804.pdf
- Data publikacji:
-
2012
- Wydawca:
-
Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu
- Źródło:
-
Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość; 2012, 1(19); 135-181
1427-7476
- Język:
-
polski
- Prawa:
-
Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone. Swoboda użytkownika ograniczona do ustawowego zakresu dozwolonego użytku
- Dostawca treści:
-
Biblioteka Nauki
-
Przejdź do źródła  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
The Basic Party Cell (POP) at the Warsaw Branch, was the Polish United
Workers’ Party’s (PZPR’s) strongest party unit in the Polish Writers’ Association
(ZLP). In Stalinist years, it was used to control and indoctrinate the community
of writers. After the political “thaw” it was affected by very strong reformist
tendencies, called “revisionist” by communist authorities. That was the difference
between it and other PZPR’s cells in ZLP’s branches. Also, POP OW ZLP due to
its numerosity and connections of some its members with the party leadership,
exerted real infl uence on ZLP’s activities and on the relations between writers
and the communist party. Nonetheless, internal divisions in the organisation were
very deep. In addition to “revisionists”, the POP was also composed of a group of
writers completely subordinated to the party’s instructions. Within the POP OW
ZLP a discussion was held on the scope of writers’ duties, resulting from the fact
of membership in PZPR. Should restrictions of free expression be accepted? Can
writers-party members participate in creating the cultural policy, or should they
only implement its guidelines? Are there perhaps any false intermediaries in the
relations between POP, and the party leadership? The authorities’ actions towards
communities of creators – mainly imposing restrictions of freedom of speech –
promptly triggered protests, also of a part of the members of POP OW ZLP. In the
14 years of Gomułka’s rule, the highest emotions were provoked by the
liquidation of the monthly „Europa” and founding of the Warsaw weekly „Kultura”, the
dispute over the letter of 34 and the counterletter of POP OW ZLP, the expelling
of Leszek Kołakowski from PZPR, and the March campaign. In this period, some
writers-party members, ignoring the risk of disfavour – left the party’s ranks; while others remained in the organisation for a long time, forming an informal opposi-
tion (“dissent within the party”), yet others remained members only in formal
terms, the group of orthodox communists rapidly diminishing. In the late 1960s,
when the anti-intelligentsia phobia among the party’s leadership became evident
for everybody, it was hard to find any big names among the members of POP OW
ZLP. The organisation became uniform in terms of ideology, but devoid of
authority and despite the opposition’s resignation from struggle, it proved incapable
of leading the community of writers. The fortunes of POP OW ZLP seem to be
a good example of ideological reconsiderations and changing attitudes within the
communist party’s intelligentsia towards the policies of Gomułka.