Ocena dokumentu przez biegłego sądowego w postępowaniu cywilnym

A court expert shall be the expert. If he is not, then he might prepare an incorrect opinion. It happens in at least in three situations. The first – a court expert is an expert, he has a special knowledge, but the does not use appropriate research methods, according to the current state of science or art. The second – a court expert is an expert, believes that he possesses a special knowledge, but actually he cannot demonstrate profesional knowledge and experience with the specified field. The third – a court expert is not an expert, he does not possess a special knowledge and he does not know appriopriate research methods. The expert has the freedom to choose research methods used in the opinion, and the court is considering comprehensive all evidence material on the basis of the principle of freedom to assess the evidence. So far, the ignorance of an expert shall not be disclosed by the parties or the Court before closing the hearing, the result may be a judgement based on flawed legal basis.