Koincydencja jako alternatywa dla „krytycznego racjonalizmu Poppera”

Social researchers must take into account that the feedback affects the value of the measurement they make. In order to preserve cognitive function, it may come to ignoring the effects of the feedback, which deforms the perfect knowledge. This is because the assertions formulated in science include both universal generalizations on the political environment as well as its participants. Undoubtedly, in relation to the behaviour of participants in the political environment we must be guided by the highly ambiguous assessment. Popper noted in many places that being confirmed many times, theories do not satisfy the condition of being a law and remain open to falsification (in Popper – “Falsifiability”). The identity of the discipline in the case of political science, depends on the macro level on emancipation from narrative of the theories of other science disciplines as well as from the direct micro-relationship policy theory and methodology on the micro level, which must set out to create a scientific symbiosis. This means that the usefulness of research findings for political science (in terms of research practice) is a function of the application approved and accepted paradigm, whose usefulness is periodic and fragmentary , but with tendency to expand its scope.