The philosophy of nothingness and love

This essay is intended to break through the stagnation and stagnation that dominates the world of today’s philosophy and to draw a new horizon for it. The question of the nature of nothingness influenced the thinkers of different epochs and geographical latitudes, among others. Lao-tzu, Chaung-tzu, Solomon, Buddha, Pascal, Nietzsche, Bergson or Heidegger. It is believed that the philosophy of European culture began with Plato, who first raised the question of the nature of existence. Existence and matter, however, are microscopic dimensions of a fragment of the universe. From the point of view of the average density of the universe, the world we consider as existing is as universal as the 3 ants to the size of our planet. Since its inception, European philosophy has focused on these three ants. We, however, found it more appropriate to focus our cognitive effort not only on the aforementioned ants, but also on the planet on which they live. We think that nothingness should be considered merely as non-existence, in other words a logical counterweight to existence. Nothing on one side contains, and on the other exceeds relative niceness and existence. We called it transcendental or absolute nothingness. Nothingness is also the supreme form of knowledge, which absolute being has manifested to the human race, but also the way leading through infinity and eternity back to absolute being. I have called this relationship ‹the principle of nothingness›.