Kalibracja wzorców liniowych do systemu fotogrametrycznego DPA Pro firmy AICON 3D Systems

W artykule zaprezentowano unikalną metodologię i wyniki wyznaczenia współczynnika rozszerzalności termicznej oraz kalibracji pary wzorców liniowych do sytemu fotogrametrycznego DPA Pro firmy AICON 3D Systems GmbH o długości 1,34 m. Stosowne badania przeprowadzono w Geodezyjnym Laboratorium Metrologicznym Wydziału Geodezji Górniczej i Inżynierii Środowiska AGH w Krakowie na zlecenie firmy MAN Bus Sp. z o.o., Oddział w Starachowicach.

The paper presents a unique methodology and results of determining the coefficient of thermal expansion and calibration of a pair of measurement standards of a DPA Pro photogrammetric system (Fig. 1) produced by AICON 3D Systems. The tests were carried out in the Geodetic Metrology Laboratory at Department of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, on behalf of MAN Bus, Branch Starachowice. Determination of the coefficient of thermal expansion was performed in a specially adapted thermal chamber (Fig. 2). The temperatures obtained in the thermal chamber during measurements of changes of the length caused by thermal factor ranged from 7 °C to 37 °C, at the average temperature of 22 °C (Fig. 3). The resulting thermal expansion coefficient was 0.31 μm/m/°C with the measurement uncertainty at 95% confidence level (2 sigma) of ± 0.06 μm/m/°C. Calibration of a pair measurement standards was made in a vertical (Fig. 5) and horizontal (Fig. 6) position twice, independently. As a master of lenght there was used the Hewlett-Packard HP 5529 laser interferometer. A two-axis measurement system of a vertical comparator allowed simultaneous measurement of microscope inclination (Fig. 4). Length of the measurement standards in the horizontal and vertical positions differs by about 8 μm, because the pattern in the horizontal position is shorter due to sagging under its own weight (Table 1). The measurement uncertainty of the DPA Pro standard length at the 95% confidence level was ± 3.9 μm.