Tytuł pozycji:
Hierarchia czy demokracja? Wizja stosunków społecznych w miastach Królestwa Polskiego (na podstawie dyskusji o samorządzie miejskim w trakcie rewolucji 1905 roku)
- Tytuł:
-
Hierarchia czy demokracja? Wizja stosunków społecznych w miastach Królestwa Polskiego (na podstawie dyskusji o samorządzie miejskim w trakcie rewolucji 1905 roku)
Hierarchy or democracy? The vision of urban social order in the Kingdom of Poland (according to the discussion about planned urban municipality during the revolution of 1905)
- Autorzy:
-
Śmiechowski, Kamil
- Powiązania:
-
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/965732.pdf
- Data publikacji:
-
2015
- Wydawca:
-
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
- Źródło:
-
Studia z Historii Społeczno-Gospodarczej XIX i XX Wieku; 2015, 14
2450-6796
- Język:
-
polski
- Prawa:
-
Wszystkie prawa zastrzeżone. Swoboda użytkownika ograniczona do ustawowego zakresu dozwolonego użytku
- Dostawca treści:
-
Biblioteka Nauki
-
Przejdź do źródła  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
After the collapse of the January Uprising in 1863 the Kingdom of Poland experienced rapid industrialization
and urbanization. When Warszawa, Łódź, Zagłębie and some smaller places became
big industrial areas the ratio of urban population grew from 10% in 1870s to 30% in 1900. The scale
of urbanization caused important social and political changes. The Revolution of 1905, considered
as the first “urban revolution” in Eastern Europe was a result of those processes and initiated the
era of modern politics and political discourse in Poland. One of new phenomena was an interesting
discussion about planned urban municipality which was held between 1905 and 1907. The author
analyses legal acts, press articles form Warszawa and Łódź and other sources in order to define
three logics of urban social order presented by different political options and ideologists.
The oldest of them was the bourgeois one, which dependent the law of voting in urban elections
and running in urban councils on the level of education and property to guarantee the dominant
position of intelligentsia in the municipality. This argumentation presented by Adolf Suligowski,
the author of the draft of new law from 1906, was criticized by members of Endecja and socialists
who were convinced to their own logics of urban social order. While first of them considered urban
population as divided between different nationalities, in socialists logic cities was mainly a battlefield
between antagonist social classes and were not interested in cooperation with different groups.
All this ideological divisions led to final failure of the Suligowski’s draft and enabled the Tsarist
administration to overemphasize ethnic problems in Kingdoms urban areas and established the
conflict between Poles and Jews the main principle of the new drafts. This helped Endecja, which
turned during the Revolution from democratic movement into a xenophobic national party, to
became the most influential party and established nationalistic logic of urban social order the most
influential.